Disputed territory: Lawyers oppose G-B’s accession to Pakistan

G-B is part of Jammu and Kashmir, which is acknowledged both historically and internationally, say MBDA members.


Ah Nizami August 30, 2012
Disputed territory: Lawyers oppose G-B’s accession to Pakistan

MIRPUR/ AJK:


The Mirpur District Bar Association (MDBA) expressed serious concerns on Wednesday over reports that the Gilgit-Baltistan (G-B) region will be acceded to Pakistan through a resolution passed by the G-B Legislative Assembly.


The MDBA in its meeting warned the government of Pakistan to desist from taking any hasty decision regarding the accession of G-B to Pakistan.

G-B is part of the disputed State of Jammu and Kashmir, a fact which is acknowledged both historically and internationally, MDBA members argued.

The speakers added that the Jammu and Kashmir dispute is on the list of UNO issues that are yet to be resolved.

G-B being part of Kashmir was thus part of the dispute and any decision to accede it to Pakistan would undermine the Kashmir freedom movement, it said.

According to the UNO resolution in this regard, a plebiscite was to be held in Jammu and Kashmir allowing the people to decide through a referendum whether they want to accede with India or Pakistan or remain independent, MDBA said.

If the plebiscite was held in Indian held Kashmir and AJK, it would also be held in G-B according to UNO’s right of self determination granted to the people of Jammu & Kashmir, it said. Therefore, Pakistan could not accept any part of the disputed area until the whole issue was resolved, they said.

They reiterated that any endeavour for accession of G-B to Pakistan would be a betrayal of the principled stance over Kashmir issue by the government of Pakistan.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 30th, 2012.

COMMENTS (21)

Observer | 12 years ago | Reply

@Kaiser Hameed Khan:

"Does the Government of AJK give a singe penny to GB out of its revenue or Budget?"

The reason for this is that Pakistan deliberately split its portion of occupied Kashmir into Azad Kashmir and Northern Areas/GB. The idea was to project the dispute with India as one with regard to Azad Kashmir and Indian Kashmir. In the process, the hope was that NA/GB would be slowly merged into Pakistan by changing demographics there.

If Pakistan had not split out Azad Kashmir, NA/GB would have been together with all Pakistani Kashmir. So the fault lies not with the AJK legislators, but with the state of Pakistan.

Observer | 12 years ago | Reply

@Hunzai: You are mixing up "will of the people, independence and being part of Pakistan. If you are truly independent now, why is that GB is ruled from Islamabad? If you want will of the people, why are you already declaring GB to be part of Pakistan?

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ