Romney makes his pick

Ryan's announcement as the VP candidate puts the most hard line side of the Republican Party on centre stage.


Editorial August 12, 2012

The battle lines are now clearly drawn for the US 2012 presidential election campaign. It is clear that a game of hardball is going to be played out with both, the Republican and Democratic sides holding diametrically opposing views. The announcement by Republican candidate Mitt Romney, of his running mate, makes it clear that he intends to go all out after President Barack Obama’s team and its policies. The announcement of Paul Ryan as the vice-presidential candidate puts the most hard line side of the Republican Party on centre stage. Ryan, who has headed the Senate budget committee, is a strong opponent of the Medicare and Medicaid programmes, reforms which formed a central part of Obama’s domestic policies in the last electoral battle. Ryan has made it clear that he opposes the changes and wishes to see less government spending on providing medical aid to those who do not have insurance. This would, of course, leave some of the poorest Americans out in the cold. Obama has already described the strategies Ryan advocates as “social Darwinism” leaving only the toughest and most able to survive. This, of course, in the present context means the rich or the relatively rich.

The picture then is now spread out before us. As was largely the case in 2008, domestic policies and the question of the state’s role in caring for those most in need will form a central point of the 2012 campaign as well. While the healthcare issue had always seemed likely to form a part of the campaign, with Ryan’s nomination, it now stands at the foreground of the contest.

By making the long-awaited announcement regarding his running mate, Romney has signalled that he has no intention of holding back. Obama will be equally determined to defend the changes he has introduced, which according to him, were aimed at assisting those Americans who have no voice. He will now need to see if these persons, and others who share his views, can lend him the same kind of support they offered four years ago and keep a Democrat in the White House for another term.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 13th, 2012.

Our Publications

COMMENTS (9)

Mirza | 8 years ago | Reply @Truth Detector: Your point is valid to some extent but not fully applicable. The US army is a volunteer army and is not based upon some region or groups. In fact the status and earnings of a specialist doctor are higher than a general in the US. The armed forces and all generals are appointed and promoted by the elected senate after an open and honest debate where they are interrogated. Only after getting an approval from the elected senate can a SC judge or a general be appointed. In addition there are no political statements or populist speeches by either of these govt servants. One wrong statement and the generals are fired. One close friend who is an ex-marine told me that we take oath not to serve the superiors but the constitution and elected govt. If a general ask us to arrest a senator, congressman let alone president, we would refuse and arrest the general for the illegal act. As the defense forces of the US have offered lots of sacrifices and have put their lives for the people and their elected govt, there is a lot of respect for them in the masses. In addition most families were forced to serve so many households still have parents who are ex-servicemen and the kids respect them. It is this law abiding history (US govt and constitution) of the armed forces that has given them some clout of sorts. Nobody here can imagine the US forces massacring their own citizens like E. Pakistan. Regards, Mirza
Truth Detector | 8 years ago | Reply

@Falcon

America’s foreign policy, energy security policy, and economic policy

None of those policies are affected by whoever is elected as president, Republican or Democrat. They remain the same. As a news for so-called 'Pakistani liberals', there is a 'deep state' in US too, just machinations are different .

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ