Steps towards greater South Asian cooperation

Four steps need to be taken towards turning South Asia into a well-integrated economic entity.

Shahid Javed Burki August 05, 2012

Four steps need to be taken towards turning South Asia into a well-integrated economic entity. The first would be to bring Pakistan back into South Asia in the economic sense. If one recalls, the area that is now Pakistan was once an integral part of what was once British India. Back then, Pakistan exported three-fourths of its food and commodity surpluses to India, getting in return about the same proportion of imports from the former. And then politics intervened and with it came suspicion, particularly on the Pakistani side of the border. Following the trade embargo imposed by India in 1949, trade between the two countries dried up. Pakistan turned its back towards India and started looking towards the West. The distant United States became its largest trading partner, defying what trade economists call the ‘gravity model of trade’.

India, in turn, adopted what some analysts call the ‘look east’ policy. The first step, therefore, would be to bring Pakistan back to South Asia and breathe new life into the South Asian Free Trade Area. The process has begun but there should be full commitment from both sides to maintain the momentum. There are groups on both sides of the India-Pakistan divide that have an interest in derailing the process. They must not be allowed to succeed.

The second step should be to open Pakistani space for use by India to trade with Afghanistan and beyond. Once again, there is movement here; a transit agreement is in the works for Afghanistan to trade with India using Pakistani territory. It is the flow of goods in the other direction that Pakistan is hesitant to permit. It is this inhibition that needs to be overcome.

The third step would be to link the various Asian countries through a network of oil and gas pipelines and with an electricity grid so that energy begins to flow from the energy surplus to the energy deficit countries. Some work has been done in this context. A gas pipeline is being constructed on the Iranian side of the border to eventually be linked with Pakistan. The Chinese have long been interested in connecting their western provinces with the gas-rich countries in the Middle East with a pipeline that will cross the length of the Pakistani territory. The private sector in India is planning to lay an oil pipeline from a new refinery located in Bhatinda in the Indian state of Punjab to the Pakistani province of Punjab. This will provide gasoline and other refined products to Pakistan.

It would take a great deal of investment to develop these routes of international commerce. Finding resources for building this type of connectivity is, therefore, the fourth step. Pakistan does not have the means to do this but it can be done with the help of private finance and private technology.

A programme focused on creating a regional network to facilitate trade could be launched. And it should have much greater involvement of the private enterprise. This is where an Asian centre of finance such as Singapore may enter the picture. It has the banking sector and other instruments of finance to establish a financial consortia to implement such a project. It also has a large and experienced construction industry to join such an effort. A city-state such as Singapore may well become the headquarter of a large consortium to handle these infrastructure projects.

Insofar as the financing of such an investment programme is concerned, there are several possibilities. The traditional sources would be the two multilateral development banks, the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank. To this, two more could be added. The BRICS countries are now working on the possibility of setting up a development bank of their own, which would be capitalised by them from their large external reserves. Large inter-country infrastructure construction projects would be a good starting point for the proposed BRICS bank.

In sum, it is possible to create a vibrant economic entity in South Asia. What is needed is political will and imagination on the part of various countries that would be involved.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 6th, 2012.


3rdRockfromtheSun | 11 years ago | Reply

This is more like Birbal's 'khayali pulav'. The author expects all of Pakistan's neighbours to bend over backwards to take actions to help Pakistan at a cost to themselves? May one inquire why? What will Pakistan bring to the table? Can it guarantee the safety and security of goods and people transitting via Pakistan? If not, then why bother? If you need help, you have to help yourself first. When majority of Pakistanis have their head buried in the sand with regards to the actual problems they as a society and country face and would rather push the blame to 'foreign hands', how can one expect any moves to correct the situation? And in the absence of such moves, why would an outsider willingly venture into Pakistan - to trade ot transit?

Realist | 11 years ago | Reply


You can keep dreaming and venting out your ignorant hate-mongering without understanding the basics of global economics. Welcome to the age of globalization, in case you have woken up from your stone age. I wonder which of the Central Asian republics would be interested in investing in or collaborating with Pakistan's bankrupt economy which has more terrorist activities than nation-building and wealth-generating fundamentals. The first essential thing for Pakistan would be to discard its madrasah begging culture (and whining all the time that they have done so much for the USA and are not getting enough in return) and engage in some constructive work that will benefit future generations. You urgently need economic reforms to revive the economy, generate more taxes and stop the feudalistic society that has impeded progress and formented petty thinking that helps vested interests (feudal lords, military, mullahs, etc.). Besides your textile industry, there is no other viable industry in Pakistan (read WB, IMF reports) to generate wealth for the nation. Even Bangladesh, which is a free country now, is prospering more than Pakistan. Don't even think of comparing yourselves to India or China which are way ahead.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ