To pay or not pay: Why should we pay taxes?

In a tax system that is ethically bankrupt, a few end up paying for so many.

Khurram Baig August 05, 2012
To pay or not pay: Why should we pay taxes?

KARACHI: Lately I’ve been thinking, we should not pay any taxes to the government of Pakistan.

All I have read (in the books we read in Pakistan) and seen (practically happening in developing countries) is that the government levies taxes on the public in return for some basic utilities and benefits that they provide to the public. In case of Pakistan, I don’t see any of the utilities/ benefits provided by the government for the welfare of the general public. Or let’s just say that I don’t see enough to warrant the governments right to demand taxes. Amenities like power, water, health, education, road infrastructure, affordable and reliable road and rail transport, public parks etc. Let’s see what our government has done on all these fronts.


This is a big issue. Not everyone has access to clean water and even those who have, you can never be sure if it’s pure or contaminated. And then there is the chronic shortage. What to talk about the rest, when the largest and most happening cosmopolitan “Karachi” has never had its problem of water resolved.


The condition of our government hospitals is not a hidden fact. Everyone knows the standard of hygiene and services available to the poor patients that end up in these hospitals. The fact is that due to the extremely poor standard of government hospitals, the marginally better condition of private hospitals are heaven for those who can afford them. But still the dilemma remains that the government has no check on any of them.


The conditions in the education sector are as bleak as our health sector. They are perfectly comparable as the condition of public health is worst at best and the mushroom growth of private institutes is not solving the problem for the masses, as they are very costly. Second, there seems to be no real government control or monitoring of the standard of the syllabus.

Road Infrastructure

Pathetic would be an understatement. I don’t even feel like talking about it. Initially the roads are broken, then they stay that way for years, then the stones are thrown all over the road (with the metal road underneath), then again it is left like that for years (so that the passing cars may level the stones) and then finally the road is constructed in patches and breaks. Once the road is completed, two things happen. Either some other government department (Sui Gas or Wasa or Wapda or PTCL) will dig it up again for their cables or pipes, or – and this happens a lot – by the time everyone has had their share of digging it up the road will have become worn out over time. This happens faster if it rains or if there is over-flowing sewage.

Road and rail transport

I am sure our economists planners can easily see that one of the easiest ways of reducing traffic congestion and fuel imports is to increase the level, both quantity and quality of public transport. This way more people will opt to not use their cars – as is the case in most developed economies with efficient public transport - there will be less cars on the road, less fuel consumed, less parking issues, less wait times at intersections and traffic lights with engines idling – and consuming fuel- and all of this can contribute to a reduction in the fuel import bill, which will help conserve our forex reserves.

Multiple taxation

And then there is the issue of multiple taxation. This is so convoluted and layered at times that it’s hard to figure out exactly how much tax we have actually paid on something.

Let’s take the simple example of say, a pencil. We pay for it, with income that is taxed at source. Then we pay sales tax on it. And in many cases we end up paying sales tax on it even if the retailer is not maintaining proper books and that sales tax may never make it to the government. So not only are we subject to double or even triple taxation, the feeling that this will probably do no more than end up lining the businessman’s pockets is frustrating.

And it is even more frustration when we are constantly barraged with the government saying that the economy is going through tough times and people need to pay taxes and be responsible and step up to the plate and all that. But at the same time, we see that the government will not reduce its own expenses, unless forced into submission by a political ally or opponent. We see that the government keeps on saying that our trade deficit is swelling, and how petroleum imports make up a huge portion of it, yet government functionaries at all levels will not agree to use smaller cars, and even lesser number of cars. That the government is willing to impose high import duties on the import of small cars, but government functionaries frequently get duty waivers. That the government says that they want to increase tax revenues, but for some reason any legislation that hints at increasing the tax base – and carries with it the suggestion that politicians or their allies might get hit – never seems to make it past the initial draft stage.

And it is predominantly the salaried class which ends up paying taxes regularly, while businessmen, industrialists and other self-employed often have the option of simply transferring any increase in costs to the end consumer, thus minimising their own liability.

The very rich are getting richer while many of our wages have been stagnant or dropping for years. Especially if we rationalise it with inflation and calculate how far one rupee went five years ago, and how far it can go today. Based in those terms, the bulk of the salaried class actually makes less money today and their buying power has fallen.

So why do so many of us pay our taxes? Two hundred thirty or so years ago, in the United States, this was called “taxation without representation” and they threw out the government.

I believe that portions of everyone’s labour should contribute to the collective well-being of the community and that’s why I say that our current tax system is ethically bankrupt. The issue here is about where the money is going, how it’s being spent, and how the spending decisions are made. I am sure if the government can come up with honest answers to these questions, and convince the people that it is sincerely doing its best in the circumstances, more people will pay taxes, or at least the ones who already are, will do so willingly.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 6th, 2012.


Yusuf | 11 years ago | Reply

Chai and Paratha Hotels in Karachi are doing Roring business. Simple arithmatic tells us Fortune being made at Karachi Taxpayer expense. Every hour hot cups and cups of Chai, Paratha, Anda Paratha, Untaxed. When these Chai Khokas, Hotels, come under Tax net, they begin to enter business stream. Sind sales tax applicable on these hotels? No Registration therfore No Tax. Inequality by Tax Authorities being practiced. We Pay Tax but there is no Return in our Old Age. There is No Benefit to Tax Paying Citizen or being a Taxpayer in Pakistan. The Tax Paying Citizen in Pakistan are Born Loosers. Its not Tax, its Extraction on whoever Registered.

Suheil Siddiqi | 11 years ago | Reply

Price of evrything has taxes baked into it.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ