Developing FATA: Split over local govt regulation 2012

Tribal elders and politicians demand a “more” transparent set-up.

Mureeb Mohmand August 04, 2012


With elections looming in the near future, tribal elders and various political party leaders are still divided over the government’s introduction of the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata) Local Government Regulations 2012.

The Fata Secretariat had sought proposals from local legislators for the introduction of a local government (LG) system in the Fata. A pilot project in this regard was started almost ten days ago in Bajaur Agency.

The Express Tribune had asked various local political leaders, parliamentarians and tribal elders for their views on the coalition government devised draft of the LG system.

Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) National Assembly member (MNA) Akhunzada Chittan said that the party backs the move and demands the election mechanism be based on adult franchise and the party system. He lamented, however, that the funds allocated for the tribal areas had not been utilised properly and were instead being diverted for the development of other sectors across the country. Chittan hoped leaders elected under the LG system would help solve problems that continued to plague the region. He suggested setting up a Fata council to decide the future of the tribal areas.

Senator Hilal Rehman urged the need to discard decades-old draconian laws and introduce a proper judicial system. He said the council should keep a strict check on financial matters and supervise the execution of welfare projects across the tribal belt. Rehman further suggested that tribal leaders and representatives be taken into confidence before introducing any legislation.

Zahir Shah Safi, a political reformer and tribal lawyer, told The Express Tribune that elections should be held on union and tehsil levels before merging Fata with Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) or keeping the region independent, and Fata councils should have the final say on the decision. He supported the setting up of a municipal system in Bajaur Agency’s Khar headquarters.

President of the Awami National Party’s (ANP) Mohmand Agency chapter, Nisar Mohmand said their party supports the plan. He added that it should not follow the Nazim-based system introduced by Pervez Musharraf. “The regulation should be like that of the provincial LG system.” He opposed the Fata council, however, saying the time was ripe to merge the tribal areas with K-P. Mohmand criticised the role of political agents in the process and stressed the need to reduce the political administration’s role and make the process more result oriented.

Tribal elder and Halemzai peace committee leader Muhammad Ali Halemzai also opposed the plan and called upon the stakeholders to forge unity for the restoration of peace. He said normalcy was necessary to implement any regulation and introduce a new setup. He wished for the tribal areas to be brought at par with other parts of Pakistan in terms of peace, development, rules and regulations.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 4th, 2012. 


Klivingchen | 11 years ago | Reply @gul bahadur: The people of FATA do not want to be merged with Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, they want their own province. Also you haven't read up on damning international reports about how sloppy, handicapped and useless the Afghan army is. Once foreigners withdraw it will disintegrate into ethnic militias at each other's throats. And it is a non-Pashtun and anti-Pashtun army. Keep that in mind.
gul bahadur | 11 years ago | Reply

How many more years the ENEMIES of tribal people will devise more tricks to loot the poor people of that God forsaken area? Why not merge it with Pakhtoonkhwa if you are sincere to the people.All those who are trying to fool the people by towing the line of bureaucracy are enemies of the people.Very soon you will see young people applying for jobs in Afghan army.Then it would be too late for the corrupt politicians of this country.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ