Contempt law case: AG objects to bench, accuses judges of being biased

Court tells Attorney General to name judges, present, in written, his reasons for calling them biased.

Web Desk August 02, 2012

ISLAMABAD: Attorney General Irfan Qadir, during the hearing of petitions against the contempt law, objected to four judges of the bench, stating that they gave the impression of being biased, Express News reported on Thursday.

A five-member bench, headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, was hearing the case.

Qadir appeared before the court and stated that the way hearing was being conducted gave the impression that the court was being “biased”, to which the chief justice enquired from whose side he was raising the question of “bias” since he was not representing the government in this case.

The court told the AG to name the judges and present, in written, his reasons for calling them biased.

“This is not the first time you have raised objections over the constitution of a bench,”  said the chief justice, adding that if he had raised the issue earlier, the court would not have wasted 10 days of hearings.

The chief justice told Qadir that he was making baseless accusations against the judges and he should not do so.

Earlier, Chief Justice Chaudhry, while hearing petitions against the new contempt law, said that those holding public offices could be prosecuted if they were to commit contempt of court.


irfan ali | 9 years ago | Reply

If Gilani had written the letter and obeyed the court order, what do you think would have happened? When the government which is PPP repeatedly violates the laws and keep engaging in corrupt practices to protect their prior corruption and gain additional massive wealth at the expense of the poor masses, the court has to act and they had to act multiple times because they keep violating laws multiple times, it gives the appearance as if the court is biased against PPP. May Allah save this country from these corrupt big wigs and dictators, bring peace and prosperity to our country, Ameen.

Saeed | 9 years ago | Reply AG mainly objects to the judges because he is the watchdog of the intrests of the federation. And federation pay its reward. Judges do the right job at present. Judiciary is the custodian of the constitution. Why PPP not act upon the constitution.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read