Transgenders take to the streets against drones

The protestors were led by Sanam Fakir, who heads a welfare trust.


Our Correspondent July 30, 2012
Transgenders take to the streets against drones

SUKKUR:


Drone strikes have inspired protests by political parties and religious groups, and on Monday the transgender community in Sukkur joined them in their outrage.


Dozens of people held a rally and demonstrated at the Minara road to protest against Nato supply routes being reopened and drone strikes. According to the protestors, drone strikes are counterproductive and result into collateral damage, which is intolerable.

The protestors were led by Sanam Fakir, who heads a welfare trust. The protestors made their way from the clock tower through the main roads of the city to Minara Road.

Sanam Fakir condemned drone strikes in Pakistan’s tribal areas. Fakir said that thousands of innocent men, women and children have been targeted in the ‘merciless’ drone strikes, but the government was not taking concrete efforts to stop them.

Fakir said that the US claims that it is targeting terrorists by the drones but asked who was responsible for the deaths of innocents. According to Fakir, drone strikes are greater acts of terrorisms. To further elaborate, Fakir asked that if terrorists were to enter a school in the US and take students hostage, the US would not send drones to fire missile on the school but would find the safest way to kill or arrest the terrorists without harming the children.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 31st, 2012.

COMMENTS (10)

AFGHAN | 12 years ago | Reply

Now, the Americans need to take it seriously. After all, it's now something about the LGBT rights of their voices being heard.

Desecration of june 1984 | 12 years ago | Reply

@Zalim Singh: Right, people should not be labelled in terms of gender or lack thereof but just by their nationality. Proud of your keen observation!

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ