Olympic, Saudi officials in talks to resolve hijab ban

International Judo Federation president confirmed female Saudi athletes would not be allowed to wear a hijab.


Reuters July 27, 2012
Olympic, Saudi officials in talks to resolve hijab ban

LONDON: Olympic and Saudi Arabian officials are in talks with judo chiefs to find a solution after the sport's governing body ruled the Saudi's female competitor would have to fight without a hijab.

On Thursday, the head of the International Judo Federation (IJF) president Marius Vizer confirmed Wodjan Ali Seraj Abdulrahim Shaherkani, one of the first two female athletes sent to the Olympics by the Muslim kingdom, would not be allowed to wear a hijab.

Shaherkani is due to compete in the women's heavyweight tournament next Friday, and her participation could now be in doubt.

"We still have one week. She is still scheduled to compete, there's no information that she won't compete," IJF spokesman Nicolas Messner told Reuters. "We still have time."

He said talks were underway between the Saudi Arabian National Olympic Committee, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and the IJF to attempt to resolve the issue.

He did not elaborate on how this could be achieved but said there was "very good collaboration".

IOC spokesman Mark Adams confirmed there had been a meeting on Thursday.

"It was a positive discussion and we are confident a solution will be found," he said. Asked what that solution would be, he said: "there are a range of options."

No one from the Saudi delegation could be reached for comment.

However, a Saudi official had told Reuters earlier this month they expected that the women would have to obey the Islamic dress code. He did not elaborate, but other Muslim countries have interpreted this to mean a headscarf, long sleeves and long pants.

Vizer told reporters that Shaherkani would fight according to "the principle and spirit of judo" and thus without a headscarf.

Shaherkani, who will compete in the 78-kg category in judo, and teenage 800 metre runner Sarah Attar were the first Saudi women allowed to take part in the Olympics after talks between the IOC and the country.

The decision to allow female Saudi athletes to compete at London was praised by IOC President Jacques Rogge at the time.

"This is very positive news and we will be delighted to welcome these two athletes in London in a few weeks time," Rogge said in a statement in early July.

Saudi Arabia was one of three countries, alongside Brunei and Qatar, never to have sent female athletes to the Olympics but the latter two confirmed earlier this year that their delegations would include women.

COMMENTS (17)

Muhammad Hassan | 12 years ago | Reply

@Stone: Please study pre-oil era history before you comment here. They were never more than nomadic tribes, first the slaves of the Ottomans and than the British. The people of Yemen aren't very blessed now, are they?

You say the Saudis aren't living off oil? Well my friend, the petroleum sector makes up 45% of budget revenues, 55% of the GDP and a whooping 90% of exports. Sounds like they really are living off oil.

Second, it not for you to pass judgement on people's names.

And third, I can just as easily say that people like you, with CRAP in THEIR minds do not deserve to live in a country created by a secular leader.

P

stone | 12 years ago | Reply @ Muhammad Hassan..... Firstly remove the Muhammad before your name as he was Arab and Muslims feel proud to be related to Arabs anyhow. Then change your name as it is also Arabic. You should name yourself from some European transcendent. As for your question of elaboration.. Arabs(Particular of Hijaz region) are not thirsty of oil and are not living on it. They have the blessing of Prophet S.A.W. that they will never face hunger and scarcity of any thing. And yes, Pakistan is my country. people with crap in their minds and on their tongues against Muslims don't deserve to live in an Islamic country!!
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ