The desperation is evident.
The government attempted a curious move on the eve of a potentially-decisive hearing for Prime Minister Raja Pervaiz Ashraf regarding the implementation of court orders in the National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO) case. As its reply, the government filed an application in court on Tuesday, in which the attorney-general argued that it was the premier’s “constitutional obligation” to disregard court orders that “negate the constitution.”
However, the move was summarily shot down by the apex court.
A day ahead of the crucial hearing of the NRO implementation case, which is to be heard today (Wednesday), Attorney-General Irfan Qadir submitted a civil miscellaneous application asking the court to “recall” its fresh directives to Prime Minister Ashraf to write a letter to the Swiss authorities against President Asif Ali Zardari. The ‘request’ was supported by a litany of complaints against the proceedings of the implementation case, and challenging the court’s jurisdiction to direct the premier to write the letter.
“Both orders of the Court (directing Premier Ashraf to comply with its orders) were violative of the Article 248 (1) of the Constitution … and that the resultant effect of the said orders was tantamount to a clear cut violation of Article 248 (2) of the Constitution,” the attorney-general argued in the application. “The Prime Minister ... by virtue of his oath is bound to preserve and protect the Constitution of Pakistan and is under a constitutional obligation to disregard any order of the Court which negates the constitution or the law,” he added.
After the disqualification of former prime minister Yousaf Raza Gilani, who was charged with contempt for non-compliance, his successor, Raja Pervaiz Ashraf, was also sent notices by the court on the same matter. First, on June 27, Premier Ashraf was given up until July 12 to inform the court of his intentions to follow its orders. On July 12, when his counsel argued that the new premier was awaiting instructions from the cabinet, the court gave a strong-worded warning, recalling the fate of his successor, Gilani. The court gave another date July 25 (today) for compliance, “failing which this court may initiate any appropriate action under the Constitution.”
But a day before the latest deadline, the government moved an application in court not only questioning the legality of the case, but also stating clearly that the premier could not implement the court’s order of writing a letter to Swiss authorities against President Zardari.
The attorney-general in the application said Prime Minister Ashraf cannot write the letter to Swiss authorities requesting them to reopen graft cases against the president without the cabinet’s approval. “…since the new Prime Minister has not received any such advice from his cabinet … he is, therefore, not obliged under the Constitution and the Rules of Business made thereunder able to do so.”
Irfan Qadir further contended that the Court’s orders of 27 June and 12 July were not in accordance with the laws, rules, and Constitution, and were illegal, unlawful, and without jurisdiction.
The application called sections of the court’s judgment on the NRO un-implementable. “…in this case, over 8000 persons were condemned unheard … many portions of paragraphs 177, 178 and 179 were not implementable. In fact such portions have not been implemented till date.”
However, in its summary dismissal of the application, the court turned down the request saying the reply had raised objections over court’s order of June 27 and July 12, and was more like a review petition.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 25th, 2012.
COMMENTS (22)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Attorney General is always a bridge between the government and the judiciary. I really do not understand what kind of this Attorney General is who creates conflict between them.
@Imran Haider
Did you just wake up? Insult to the people? forget the people, despite the clarity of the article, even our intellectuals, analysts and legal experts attempt an interpretation otherwise!
We are a nation of clowns and jokers my friend, the biggest ones are probably you and me. That's it.
Mr Zardari should never have been elected the president of Pakistan when there were corruption cases opened in courts against him in the first place then the government of Pakistan committed obstruction of justice by asking courts to close those cases against him.
@Aftab Kenneth Wilson: "Strangely all judges of the superior courts both LHC and SC are speaking and writing verdicts with one voice. On the other hand our rightists parties are with them in full swing." Don't you see there is a GUN on their Head.
Strangely all judges of the superior courts both LHC and SC are speaking and writing verdicts with one voice. On the other hand our rightists parties are with them in full swing. I agree with AG. It seems as if our country is facing some invading judges of a foreign country. Judges must learn to restrain themselves when more important cases of common interest are kept in back burners.
@Raoufy: More nukes?
Infact, Pakistan is a country where every man wants to become the people's voice. However, the truth is that only political representatives are people's voice and rest are the machinery which runs the state. Now when machinery stops working or working against the will of the worker, it either halts or waste the overall production. Supreme court never oust an elected PM, who can be ousted only through constitutional way. But PCO judges don't think so because now they think themselves to be messiah. I wonder what wrong Dogar had done, everybody turned against him while our current CJP used to be like him. Hum karein tou dance, tum karo to Mujra...
what about thousands of other NRO cases of mass murder, violence, and extortion against one of the biggest party of Karachi? What did SC do for them? Corruption is controllable act but life is not. Why those cases against criminals, terrorists and mafia people are not taken with same keen and zeal? It raises eye brows on the partiality of courts. Why only PPP?
@Khalq e Khuda: yes there is no need to spend time to retrieve USD 60 million belonging to this poor nation. Use law to hide behind it
Don't blame politicians alone... The people who chose them are the greatest sinners.
You know what happened in Multan in recent polls, the same ruling party was elected. So i believe we should indeed curse those who voted for them.
Article 248(2) in PART XII, Chapter 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan says:
No criminal proceedings whatsoever shall be instituted or continued against the President or a Governor in any court during his term of office.
It may be a bad article and no matter how much we abhor it, presidential immunity is a part of the Consitution of Pakistan. Every word of Article 248(2) is so clear and crisp that any attempt to further interpret it should be considered an insult to the intelligence of the people of Pakistan.
Let us see how absurd this is by considering a hypothetical situation:
"SC today ruled that PM has to write a letter to Indian Govt. asking it to proceed prosecuting Hafiz Saeed. SC further stated that though Hafiz Saeed has no cases pending against him in Pakistani courts, and there is no evidence on record to punish him in Pakistan, Indian Govt. should prosecute him as they claim to have the evidence."
Now, does the above make any sense? If it doesn't make sense for hafiz saeed (accused terrorist), why does it make sense for Mr. Zardari (Accusedly corrupt)??
I really dont know what is the big deal. why does'nt the pm write a letter? What has he he got to hide. oh yeah, $6 BILLION dollers of pure pakistani peoples money! Emagine how much could be done in pakistan with that kind of money.
Attorney General just forgot one thing while making the argument. You can't argue with a troupe of PCO judges by quoting facts of law.
Another episode of our beloved Pakistani political stage show. Yawn!
The awam elected representatives to parliament with a mandate to legislate laws that allow the awam to work in an orderly society based on merit. The Supreme Court was set up to give final opinion on issues. The Attorney General has no mandate to challenge a decision of the Supreme Court. On the contrary, he is bound to enforce it. His response amounts to indiscipline and and should be treated accordingly,
The awam elected representatives to parliament with a mandate to legislate laws that allow the awam to work in an orderly society based on merit. The Supreme Court was set up to give final opinion on issues. The Attorney General has no mandate to challenge a decision of the Supreme Court. On the contrary, he is bound to enforce it.
Ok good man on the name of law, keep doing ------lawfull things, don't let the balance come, Afterall we don't need to learn we will be either this way or that way both ways will be extreme. I still believe God will bless us.
In that regard, they should know that court is also bound to the law of common sense and if that means going a step further than a written document (which has been altered to the benefit of the ruling party), then i believe, by all means they can and should proceed against the constitution. because it's about saving the lives of millions of people vs. safeguarding the interests of a handful of looters; take your pick.
Any Pakistani whether Prime Minister or Chief Justice, COAS or self claimed Khulafa of Islam must obey to the constitution. Judiciary is responsible to interpret the laws that are made by the parliament and if any institution creates atmosphere of treason or acts like that then people concerned should stand up to its disobedience and demand for consequences. This is a very clear case of forcing to commit treason not other than but Judiciary by itself. All these judges who have paralyzed the entire country must be tried under treason and it is the parliaments duty to establish some laws to remove such judges with two third majority censure as is applied to the prime minister or the president.
good one, I like it .. . ;-)