Journalism and social media

What distinguishes journalists from someone on Facebook or on Twitter is that they have ethics.

Aidan White July 23, 2012
Journalism and social media

Ever since the printing press gave birth to mass communications and journalism, the news business has been driven by technology and never more so than today.

Personal computers, smart phones, digital cameras, all of them brought to life by internet technology and social media, have put the audience in the newsroom and are redefining journalism. At the same time, the boundaries between news and entertainment and between news reporting and advertising have become blurred and people are asking whether this is hurting journalism.

This was touched upon in the Pakistan-India Social Media Mela, held in Karachi, where talk ranged from the good (internet solidarity, entrepreneurship, minority rights and Twitter literature) to the bad (internet bullying) and the downright ugly (the problem of foul-mouthed internet trolls — people who post poisonous rhetoric on social networks).

The impact of social media has driven political revolutions in Egypt, Tunisia and Libya and helped spread dramatic stories of tsunami and earthquakes in Japan and Indonesia. For some traditionalists, this carousel of change is a white-knuckle ride, but it is good news for media.

Of course, the internet is not without its traps. Some of the world’s leading media were left red-faced in 2011, for instance, when a mysterious young Arab feminist internet blogger, who had been quoted widely by journalists covering the conflict in Syria, turned out to be a hoax.

Given the problem of anonymity on the internet, journalists need to set standards and verify online sources of information to avoid repeating the misinformation, bias and ignorant prejudice that infects so much of the internet and social media. Above all, they should never forget that what distinguishes journalists from someone on Facebook or on Twitter is that they have ethics.

This difference is important to remember when the traditional definition of  the news gatherer is now being extended to include social media users. This new generation of journalists comes equipped with technical know-how and social networking skills but many of them remain ignorant about why journalism is important for democracy.

They need to learn that journalism is not an information free-for-all. To function well, it must be ethically driven. At its best, it can be a filter for decency, honesty and truthfulness but without ethical restraints, it will become just another source of propaganda.

This is a particular threat in Pakistan where state and non-state actors routinely apply political pressure, where illiteracy makes people dependent on media and where media sometimes cut ethical corners in their competition for audience, circulation and market share.

The vision of journalism as a public good still holds in the digital age, but it will only grow if traditional media begin to regard social networks and the internet as less of a threat.

All journalists might do well to embrace a touch of humility and accept more openly what US journalist Dan Gillmor famously admitted in his ground-breaking book We the Media, “my readers know more than I do”.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 24th, 2012.


Toba Alu | 11 years ago | Reply

Good article. There is a lot of truth in this article, but my personal experience with the traditional mass media is not as good as one would expect, to say the least. Just watch the documentary Weapons of Mass Deception to see how the traditional media were selling lies en mass. So treat every piece of information with common sense and dig critically deeper, every time all the time.

tazeen | 11 years ago | Reply

is everthing in newspapers the truth? and whose version of it?

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ