Pakistan ranked 71 in World Bank Logistics Performance Index

Rank, though still low, has improved since the 2010, 2011 floods.


Shahram Haq July 22, 2012

LAHORE:


A significant determinant of the economic performance of any country is the infrastructure present in the country. The more a country builds its infrastructure, the better the flow of logistics over its geography. This forms the backbone of smooth trade.


World Bank’s most recent Logistics Performance Index (LPI) has ranked Pakistan at number 71 out of a total of 155 surveyed countries. Pakistan continues to rank in the middle of the ranking – among governments that spend very little money to improve infrastructure – despite its location at an ideal geopolitical crossroads. Comparatively, the LPI report has ranked India at 46, whereas China has been ranked at number 26.

The LPI ranks countries by analysing the efficiency of customs and border management clearance; the quality of trade and transport infrastructure; the ease of arranging competitively priced shipments; the competence and quality of logistics services; the ability to track and trace consignments; and the frequency with which shipments reach consignees within scheduled or expected delivery times.

The LPI compares the trade logistics profiles of 155 countries, and rates them on a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The ratings are based on 6,000 individual country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders, who rate the eight foreign countries their company serves most frequently.

Singapore is the leading country in the 2012 LPI survey. It scored 4.13, with 100% performance. Pakistan and India have been placed in the group of partial performer countries, which includes countries with logistics constraints most often seen in low- and middle-income economies. The LPI survey gives a 2.83 score to Pakistan, and 3.08 to India. China scored 3.52, and has been placed in the top 10 upper-middle-income performers.

This is the third report which the World Bank’s International Trade Department has produced, publishing them once every two years, starting from 2007. The first LPI survey in 2007 had ranked Pakistan at number 68, which dropped to 110 in 2010. The sudden drop to the 2010 rank was mainly due to destructive nationwide flooding, which critically damaged the infrastructural network in the country.

Therefore, although still very low, Pakistan’s current rank has improved 29 positions since the last report. The betterment in rank has been achieved primarily due to the attention of the government, donor agencies and financial institutes to rebuilding damaged infrastructure.

Pakistan’s logistics mostly rely on the road network. According to World Bank’s statistics, 96% of national freight traffic is carried on road networks. This is mainly due to the failure of Pakistan Railways’ freight operations, which have been at a halt since 2011, and only briefly resumed this year. Freight journeys via road normally take 2-4 times longer than they would in Europe, mainly due to poor and unreliable infrastructure. This constrains Pakistan’s ability to integrate into global supply chains, which require just-in-time delivery. According to the World Bank, the poor performance of the sector is estimated to cost the economy 4-6% of the national GDP every year.

Via air, Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) carries almost all air freight traffic. Its share forms an insignificant part of the total, mainly due to the government’s close involvement – which prevents PIA from operating on a strictly commercial basis.

In ports, despite implementing the Pakistan Customs Computerized System – which reduced customs clearance to less than 24 hours – the container dwell time remains 5-6 days on average, above international standards of 3-5 days, reducing the capacity of container terminals to less than their potential.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 22nd, 2012.

Our Publications

COMMENTS (9)

Ali | 8 years ago | Reply

Well, I would disagree on the privatization or liberalization not being the problem. Keynesian, mode of economy was responsible for the boom that caused a lot of developments for the advanced countries. Liberalization on the other hand have gotten them disastrous results. It is not just our economy that is under cartels with there kick backs and what not's, it is a global phenomena, in fact it would be safe to say it is necessary by product of the free market economies. It is not the will of the individuals, it is the economical system, that is screaming for a change, talking about democracy and dictatorship, what is the difference between the economical laid out plans of Zia, Benazir, Nawaz, Musharraf and current PPP? Not a single difference. Privatization and cuts on welfare sector. While our army gets a huge chunk out of the cake. along with foreign loans.

Muhammad Shoaib Akif | 8 years ago | Reply

Nothing is failing world wide, what are failing more or falling are the failed states. We are one of them, unfortunately. State means governing system. We take parliament as a whole state. Privatization or liberalization of economy is not the problem worldwide but the states' regulation of economies. More unfortunately, our economy is under the control of cartels and not the of the state. That's where even most pious tends to take advantage. Moreover, private investment increases jobs, so does GDP. Had civil-military bueaucracy not governed 35 years out 65 years' life of Pakistan, situation would have been different today here in the 'land of pure'. Most unfortunately, that's why 8% of our GDP is under tax and that too we snatch from consumers of goods and services- the poor people through indirect taxes. Rich don't pay taxes but enjoy every state's facility. The snatched money thus runs the state as revenue, so does the vicious circle go on and poverty go up.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ