Sim Sim Hamara: The show must go on, says Peerzada

Rafi Peer Theatre Workshop’s Faizan Peerzada is bewildered by corruption allegations.


Sher Khan July 21, 2012

LAHORE:


The Urdu rendition of “Sesame Street”, “Sim Sim Hamara” was introduced in Pakistan last December as one of USAID’s most interesting initiatives for the country. The $20 million collaboration with the reputable Rafi Peer Theatre Workshop (owned by the Peerzadas) was made to promote a tolerant and vibrant view of Pakistan for children through a first-of-its-kind children’s show which encompassed a child-friendly curriculum supporting children’s cognitive, social, emotional and physical development. However, USAID has pulled the plug on its funding, as corruption allegations surfaced that the money was being mishandled. Consequently, this also meant that around 150 people lost their jobs.


The Peerzadas staunchly rejected these claims and held a press conference with major media outlets last week to clear their name. While USAID is trying to quickly wrap up proceedings, chief of party Faizan Peerzada is defiant on both counts; first, on clearing his family’s reputation and second, on continuing the programme. According to a Gallup report, the show had a viewership of 20 million every month. “June was a critical month as we were going to go on air in Pashto and Balochi, while other dubbed versions were going to the heartland of Pakistan with a video van. How could you close such a show?” Peerzada beseeched.

He also added, “If after 38 years we wanted to do this (corruption), then I think we should have been in another business,” Peerzada said. He is still unclear about what exactly the allegation was. “There is this fallacy going around that we have embezzled $20 million. It is not possible,” he told The Express Tribune.

Peerzada clarified that USAID had initially cut the funding by $10 million, of which the theatre company would receive seven million dollars and the remaining three million would be for the “Sesame Street” franchise. He added that the initial amount that had been promised by the US agency was $12.97 million, of which about seven million would have been allocated to the workshop. Peerzada’s contention is that his organisation has only spent a total of five million dollars, so the allegation of an embezzlement of $20 million was not logical.

Additionally, Peerzada claims the process was checked on every level by USAID from the very beginning. According to him, procurements over $5,000 had to be processed by a USAID recommended consulting agency Jobs International Project Limited and then sent through Pakistan Children’s Television (PCTV) to USAID to be approved.  Peerzada’s argument is that with these set of rules at every step, the funds could not possibly have been misused. The monitoring system within the USAID apparatus has raised questions as to how corruption of this magnitude could occur if the project was being this heavily monitored.

Denying a report published in Pakistan Today, where a source has been quoted saying that the Peerzadas “turned the project into a family affair, awarding all key posts to close relatives,” Peerzada said that its authenticity has been questioned through a $10 million law-suit asking for punitive damages for defamation.

At the end, Peerzada suggested that “Sim Sim Hamara” was engulfed in the uneasy dynamics of Pakistan-United States relations, which may have caused funding to stop. “I strongly believe that it had a role, but I don’t want to take protection under this,” states Peerzada, who does not wish to gain sympathy on this basis.

Lamenting the halt of the workshop, Peerzada said he is adamant that the show must go on, even if they have to go commercial. “We have created an original programme which we will continue on our own time, we did not come with empty pockets to this project,” he added.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 22nd, 2012.

COMMENTS (13)

Aliya | 9 years ago | Reply

All i can say is nothing is stopping USAID to pull out of the project if they have already done it then y are the making such a fuss about it. The family excuse is not going to fly as the entire world knows that they are a family company and so did Usaid and if they are all sitting in office car going for work what you will say that the Peerzada family traveling in project cars .... hahah thats no reason to shut the program i think USAID is up against much bigger challenges in Pakistan then monitoring the Peerzada family. The project has gone through so many audits i think if there was a substantial charge against the peers it would have come out in USAIDs statements. Unfortunately this time round it looks like this is a deliberate attempt on putting down pakistanis and the good work happening in our country. PS: Qasim Luk which other Sesame project was able to self sustain its self 2 years before time? Please do some research on that this was a successful show and why a successful show would be sabotaged like this is what i question if USAID is dedicated towards education then they would have surely handled this matter an another matter because at the end of the day it has reach 120 million children so far and would continue to multiply.

Qasim Luk | 9 years ago | Reply

The comments by "Sonya", "annoyed by stupidity", and "b for bee" seem to have been written by the same person, same writing style, same level of rabid support for the peers. The aid agency has given their charge list and it has been very specific, the peers have not only handed out position to unqualified or underqualified relatives, they have also given out exorbitant pays to these relatives and used the mobilization advances to pay off their older loans, effectively cash strapping this effort. They are also accused of "consistent" personal use of aid funded resources like cars, offices, and travel funds.

Instead of making this a Pakistan Vs. U.S issue and defending the wrong actions of people like the peers, we should truly admit where we are wrong and hold them accountable. The last comment by the pro-peerzada poster said that the aid agency is doing this because they are afraid that the education will reach too many children, are you joking? look at the history of education development by sesamae street around the world before you spew such unfounded hatred, it is one of the worlds most dedicated education institutions, at the very least base the comments on some logic.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

E-Publications

Most Read