US lawmakers approve cut in Pakistan aid: Report

US lawmakers approve amendment to cut the US aid to Pakistan by half.


Web Desk July 19, 2012
US lawmakers approve cut in Pakistan aid: Report

The US House of Representatives has approved an amendment which would cut US aid to Pakistan by half, bringing the amount down to $650 million, the Associated Press reported on Wednesday.

Calling Pakistan the “Benedict Arnold” of nations, Representative Ted Poe complained about the level of Islamabad’s cooperation in the fight against terrorism, the report said. It added that the members of the Congress were particularly angry with Pakistan’s conviction of Dr Shakil Afridi, who conducted a fake polio vaccination in order to help CIA track down al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad.

“Pakistan doesn’t deserve the American money,” Poe was quoted as saying.

According to a report by Politico, Poe had first demanded a $1.3 billion cut from Pakistan’s military aid and had initially won the endorsement of Representative Bill Young, but later a cut of $650 million was settled upon.

The Politico report also quoted Poe as saying that Pakistan is “playing” America.

The unsteady relations between Pakistan and the US were coming back on track when Pakistan reopened the Nato supply routes in return for an apology offered by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. But this cut in aid may harm the ongoing efforts between the two countries to maintain a balanced relation.

COMMENTS (68)

Ahmer Ali | 12 years ago | Reply

As you wish our worldly master.Please cut all the aid and let us to stand on our own feet to get real self-reliance,honor,grace,dignity,pride and sovereignty..........

gp65 | 12 years ago | Reply

@usmanx: "gp65, are you surprised — didn’t think superpower india has taken more aid? do your own homework. OEDC database is available query pak and india and sum up the values….

do a search on OEDC on a thing called http://www.google.com"

This just tells me that you have no link to back up the wild number you came up with. You also did not answer me what your definition of 'aid' was.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ