A caretaker government as the institution that will conduct the next election headed by a neutral prime minister plus cabinet has always aroused suspicion about the fabled ability of President Asif Ali Zardari to subvert persons and institutions in his party’s favour. It was expected that there will be a battle royale over the issue after the election is announced. Bickering over judges’ appointment between the two parties has already resulted in the transfer of authority of induction to the Chief Justice of Pakistan. Will more bickering denude the parties further of their legitimate powers? This must weigh upon the minds of the politicians on both sides. Will they do something about it?
Speculations started brewing in Islamabad. ‘Credible sources’ said that the ruling PPP and the PML-N were close to ‘working out a deal that would result in both naming a consensus caretaker prime minister and finalisation of a date for election to be held before the end of the year’. Two persons were named, both unlikely: human rights lawyer Asma Jahangir and Pakistan’s UN envoy Abdullah Hussain Haroon. The choice of Ms Jahangir would clearly have been a message to an ‘excessive’ Supreme Court, while Mr Haroon would have been suspect because of his connection to President Zardari. Rumours began to circulate about a joint PML-N-PPP stance vis-à-vis the judiciary in favour of parliamentary supremacy.
Soon enough, the PML-N denied proposing Ms Jahangir or Mr Haroon for the slot of caretaker prime minister and termed the news a baseless rumour. It actually blamed the PPP for floating the story to malign the PML-N in the eyes of its supporters and said that ‘when the time comes to choose caretakers it will consult all the opposition parties including the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf’. Alas, last time it did so in the case of Justice (retd) Fakhruddin G Ebrahim as Chief Election Commissioner, it was slightly put off by the 84-year-old’s remark that only two elections had been held fairly in the past and in both cases, the PPP was returned to power. To be fair, he also criticised the PPP’s decision to push through a change of rules of contempt of court through a legislation. People started recommending that maybe Pakistan should follow India and Bangladesh on the rules regarding an election commissioner’s age. The catch here is that if the PPP and the PML-N fail to jointly choose a caretaker government, then Mr Ebrahim will get to appoint one under the 20th Amendment.
Whatever may be the outcome of these speculations, the truth is that both parties feel threatened by ‘third parties’. The judiciary is increasingly relying on its street power and Imran Khan, appearing unmindful of the sensitivities of the PML-N when declaring that parliament was no longer supreme. The Court was possibly leaning on judicial memory of what the PML-N had done to the Sajjad Ali Shah Court. The other growingly threatening factor is the rise of Imran Khan as the leader who beats the ideologues of the PML-N on slogans of change. The ‘wave’ he might create with his radical message behind an ‘Islamic welfare state’ will cut into the vote bank of the PML-N as the PPP shrinks in Punjab.
The threat of Imran Khan as he sallies forth into Waziristan with one lakh supporters should shine some light in the dark corners of the mindset that empowers other institutions and parties by cutting the ground from under the bipartisan system Pakistan has enjoyed for the past 20 years.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 17th, 2012.
COMMENTS (11)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
PML and PPP under the charter of democracy will play in turns looting the country while third PTI party of upcoming looters wait for a Britain like scenario of LibDems
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch"
Secondly
"as the world complained about ‘lack of restraint’ on the part of judges" seriously? ET by world you mean US? or IHT?
It is PK internal matter!
they are scared due to raising popularity of Imran khan
A good pragmatic editorial and advise to the political parties.
PPP and PMLN, two sides of the same coin!!!
no need to sensationalise the news. if governemnt and opposition wont discuss the caretaker set up and next elections who else will? other parties have delibrately kept themselves out of the political system. i wonder wht magic are they waiting that will rectify all errors in eletoral rolls of by elections and everything will be ok in general election
Unfortunately, due to lack of leadership qualities, PML-N last 9 months decision revolve around fear of PTI instead independent decision. Whenever, they sit to decide, they keep PTI in their mind
@faraz Keep in mind that some of the parties did not take part in the elections and deem themselves to be bitter opposition than the one inside the parliament. so if increase the sphere of opposition, i tend to agree with you.
The threat of Imran Khan as he sallies forth into Waziristan with one lakh supporters should shine some light in the dark corners of the mindset that empowers other institutions and parties by cutting the ground from under the bipartisan system Pakistan has enjoyed for the past 20 years.
Would ET care to elaborate which bi-partisan system and where does it exist, no one cut the ground its the corruption of both parties and their old allies that has given rise to Imran Khan. But ET is very happy with corrupt parties anything to save the old guard.
Well said. One of the rare insightful editorials I have seen on ET.
It is an improvement whatever the reason for flexibility. The smartest man of the 20th century wasn't Albert Einstein. It was George Santayana, who said something to the effect that those who fail to learn from history are condemned to repeat it. I think If two re fighting, they must make sure that a third invisible player does not steal the show. And I do not mean PTI here
That is the constitution rite of govt. and opposition to discuss the next care taker government.