Without throwing in a lot of legal mumbo jumbo at the reader, what the contempt bill in effect means in simple English is that certain functionaries are above the reach of the courts and can do what they jolly well like, without interference from the Supreme Court. So long as they don’t bump anybody off. And so long as they don’t commit treason. But… hang on. When the bill is passed, who would decide whether treason is or is not being committed, or whether the Constitution is being willfully abused? The theatrically fecund vulpine family surrounding the president? The ISI? Mr Kayani? Mubashar Lucman?
It appears as if the president and his stooges in the PPP are hell-bent on turning the Supreme Court into a ceremonial institution, where the chief justice’s duties would be limited to acting as chief guest at university convocations and art exhibitions and attending innumerable conferences abroad. The government is obviously not pushed about issues like the case of the missing persons and the uncountable charnel house of corpses that Their Lordships are vigorously pursuing.
Mind you, there is also the other side of the coin. The PPP loyalists have a point when they maintain that members of the assemblies and Senate are elected by the people, unlike members of the judiciary. And the voters made a conscious choice when they selected their candidates. They tell me that if I don’t like what the current government is doing — I shouldn’t vote for them at the next election. The problem is, under the Constitution, we have to wait five years for that to happen. And by that time, we’ll probably hit a Rs150 to the dollar.
Anyway, those patriotic citizens who still believe in a system of checks and balances should take heart. This chief justice is no pushover. He has given the current prime minister until July 25 to write the loaded letter. The lawyers have been aroused from their slumber, are wearing black armbands and will be soon on the war path. Imran Khan will be leading another political tsunami on Islamabad. And Hafiz Saeed has fired a broadside against President Asif Ali Zardari for not following the Sunnah and said he should take a lesson from the British prime minister who lives in a four-bedroom house in a quiet street guarded by one policeman. It will be an exciting fortnight. The rumour is that the deputy prime minister from the Turncoat Party is already being groomed to take over and the cabinet is preparing a roster of hopefuls who will enjoy their brief moment of glory before they too are summoned to perform the legal ritual in this black comedy which apparently has no end.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 15th, 2012.
COMMENTS (9)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@observer: First one
The constitutional immunity to the President of Pakistan is meant to protect him against legal proceedings regarding his actions taken and decisions made in order to carry out the official business of the state. It is not for his personal acts - you cannot term corruption, fraud, and murder as official business, do you? More importantly, should he be extended immunity for such acts? - or the actions he takes as a co-chairperson of PPP. No where such a blanket immunity is extended in a democratic system. If you know a similar case, please let us know. You also need to learn about the Watergate case against President Nixon and Monica Leuwinsky case against President Clinton in USA. Were they spared from the legal action in the name of presidential immunity.
Well if oligarchy of the most corrupt, unscrupulous plunders, and deeply inept is democracy then we would be much better of without it. Your desperate rhetoric to save the graft money of US$ 60 million of Mr. Zardari in the name of saving democracy and country (I don't know where you get it except you imaginations and personal wishes) cannot and should not mislead the commoner, though most of the informed Pakistanis cannot be fooled by your rhetoric. The corruption is the mother of all evils and problems in Pakistan as the criminals escape the law through corruption perpetuating the miseries already created by the ineptness of the current PPP government. Instead of blaming the courts, who the first time in their history are doing the right things, why don't you ask the PPP leaders to follow the laws and court orders.
You have the nerve to speak for a thinking man? I'm no fan of PPP, in fact, beyond that Edhi guy, everyone in the public eye who makes the news should be considered a country-wide-shame. But, if you can't see the wider implications of how the judiciary is acting in the big picture then that tone of know it all arrogance you're employing is in the wrong hands. You even start off on a lame foot. The only thing that bill accomplishes is some job security for the PM so they can actually do their job. You'd have to be blind to not see the controversy over even the decisions made by Gilani in the wake of his dismissal. That can't repeatedly happen and not harm a country. The bill doesn't even help the president himself. The court is basically just harassing them since they can't even put the president through trial to begin with right now. Lots of time has passed even before that letter request. You can wait a little longer and not harm the country in the process. Yes, the country, not just PPP, because the next set have to clean up the mess that is being made. It's also not about PPP. Think of another party in power clashing with a tyrant of a judge in the future. If there are no other laws beyond contempt for you to use as leverage, you haven't got a leg to stand on in the first place. Contempt at its essence is just revenge by an insecure judge with hurt feelings. It's very easy to come at criminals from more than one angle when you actually have a case against them because usually the judgment is supposed to be made "beyond a reasonable doubt." Contempt is a matter of opinion, not evidence.
I am at a complete loss of wits.
Are these Parliamentarians saying that they will not write the letter ONLY for Mr Zardari?
Or, are they saying that as long as the Constitution has a provision for extending immunity to the President this letter can not be written?
If it is the first, then Yes it is Hail to the Chief.
If it is the latter, then it is Hail to the Constitution.
Which one is it?
How's the poor country going to afford the life long pensions and other expenses of the instant prime ministers?
The PCO judges will not restrain themselves. They will kick this PM out as well. The law is a reaction to the unprecedented use of contempt of court to dismiss a PM. The actions of the supreme court will kill off democracy in Pakistan. People who are old enough remember the consequences of the judicial murder of ZAB by the then supreme court. We have already lost the Baloachis. They do not believe that have any say or part in Pakistan. A few PM's later, do not be surprised if the overwhelming sentiment in Sindh is the same. KP is barely a part of Pakistan as it is. Without democracy it will be nearly impossible to hold Pakistan together, and unfortunately the egomaniacs we are stuck with will not allow democracy to take root here.
It is in the culture of Pakistan to remove elected governments. Since coups are not in vogue, others methods are being tried. SC, Hafeez, Taliban, Nawaz Shareef, Imran are all after Zardari. This is not democratic culture. In a democracy once you have elected him you have to bear him for 5 years.
You have said what is known but sice you said it so well, it was well worth the read.