Pakistan started its peaceful nuclear programme in 1954 as part of the US Atoms for Peace initiative. The Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC) was established in 1956 and in 1957, Pakistan became one of the founding members of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). In 1960, the first nuclear medical centre was established in Karachi and in 1963, the foundational stone of the Pakistan Institute of Science and Technology was laid. The agreement for Pakistan’s first nuclear power plant (NPP) was signed with Canada in 1965 and by 1971, the Karachi Nuclear Power Plant (KANUPP) started its operations.
After India’s nuclear weapon test of 1974, Pakistan was unfairly punished and in 1976, Canada stopped fuel supplies for KANUPP, which was operating under the IAEA safeguards and did not pose any proliferation risk. This embargo, in a way, helped the country to develop its indigenous capability and Pakistan started producing fuel for KANUPP in a short period of two years. Over the last 40 years of its life cycle, KANUPP, which is the oldest reactor of its kind in the world, continues to operate safely with IAEA certification. It is a reflection of Pakistan’s technical expertise in the nuclear field.
Due to the growing energy demand, Pakistan plans to increase the share of nuclear energy to 8,800 megawatt electrical by the year 2030. This would constitute 5.41 per cent of the overall energy mix. Other sources of energy — hydel, coal, renewable, oil and gas — would still have the major percentage. In order to expand the share of nuclear energy, which could significantly reduce reliance on external sources of energy, Pakistan needs to invest more in terms of financial resources and overcome politically-motivated barriers through diplomatic means in the form of Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG).
Pakistan and India are both non-NPT nuclear weapon states and thus remain technically ineligible for nuclear trade with the NSG. The NSG, however, accorded a waiver in September 2008, allowing India to enter into civil-nuclear cooperation agreements with the NSG members. In November 2010, the US also declared that it will support India’s full membership in the NSG. If India could be given a waiver and considered for full membership of the NSG, Pakistan has no lesser credentials. Making an India-specific exemption and denying the same to Pakistan, is not only discriminatory, but it also contradicts Article III(C) of the IAEA Statute, which does not precondition assistance on peaceful uses of nuclear energy “to any political, economic, military or other conditions incompatible with the provisions of the [IAEA] Statute”.
Pakistan has vast experience in the nuclear field. The safe operation of nuclear power plants over the past several decades is a reflection of the expertise and professionalism of its scientists. Pakistan, however, needs access to nuclear energy to meet its growing development needs. This requires removal of artificial and discriminatory barriers in the form of NSG restrictions, which can be made possible by launching a major diplomatic offensive as Pakistan cannot afford to remain in a state of perpetual discrimination.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 11th, 2012.
COMMENTS (38)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
I am surprised at the negative out cry on an issue of non discrimination and a criteria based approach. As Pakistan is going through troubled waters we need to put serious attention on these issues that can contribute to the elements of our national power. The advise is not peculiar about Pakistan but the negative reaction to it is surely surprising!
Dear ET, you surely deserve better than this. You are one of the very few newspapers from Pakistan that's respected around the world.
The writer is a PhD scholar at the Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad. I hope going by the name "Quaid-i-Azam University", it must be a very reputed institute in Pakistan. Is this article an indication of quality of education in the university and hence pakistan?
These articles seem to be a part of a seasonal exercise on ET by various authors. The pattern is well established. References are made to the need for nuclear power as an energy concern and Pakistan's proliferation record is decisively ignored. They have been a part of the landscape since the Indo US nuclear deal. However I am intrigued about their purpose. They cannot mask the truth. Cannot hope to change the US policy towards Pakistan's nuclear aspirations. If the audience is domestic, the comments on ET show that the readers have common sense. They would have wised up to this a while back. No new arguments are presented either.
@Mr X from boombai, sir if all the civilized world dont let u get any thing for your safety what would u do for example if your family is dying of hunger what u gonna do u gonna steal right no metter what u gonna feed your family and if the same situtaion comes to country then i think Robinhood is our hero not villon and by the way north korea lost over two millions innocent peoples and they were some body love ones and pakistan lost its Eastren part and what ever its take it will save half pakistan ..... and every nation stole from another nuclear nation.
Thanks for the laughs ET!!
@Usman
Pro-reality? What is that dear? I believe reality is kind of opposite to delusion. Or you mean to say that you are so deluded that you consider delusion as reality?
@Usman I think our Indian users are not used to reading pro-reality articles in Pakistani newspapers
You should rephrase to "I think our Indian users are not used to the reality of Pakistani newspapers"
I think our Indian users are not used to reading pro-reality articles in Pakistani newspapers.
Yet another child from Pakistan who grew up in lies and conspiracy theories widespread in his / her country. India tested nuke in 1974 and Pakistan was punished??? How naive. You missed the whole book of history between India's nuke test and Pakistan being black labeled. Hopefully you know who AQ Khan is and how he achieved nuclear technology. And for your kind information, nuclear technology so far has been passed on from one nation to other, India being one of them. Only Pakistan is one which stole it and gave it to other black listed nations such as North Korea. To top that, whatever limited fissile material you have , your mad army is busy making more nuclear missiles out of it. Plus here comes the best part. As an absolute "Non responsible" nation it has decided to use "First Strike" policy making Pakistan more likely than India in actually launching nukes. Tell me again. Why does Pakistan deserve equal treatment as India on nuclear issue ?
thanks ET .. i had a good laugh to start the day ..
This is the worst editorial I have read in ET. IF u want nuclear energy, ask for it. Whether u get it or not, is not the issue, but how you justify your request is the issue. All the comments have shred this editorial to pieces and it deserves that. I just could not believe that this article is about nuclear aspects of Pakistan and it has not even mentioned the roles of China and AQ khan. No wonder there are so many critical comments.
This looks like a school essay
Did the opening sentence really read - "Nuclear power is one of the most efficient, reliable and environment-friendly sources of energy" ? Note the operative word "most" !! Clearly the author lives on a planet where Fukushima and Japan don't exist! Will the author be so kind as to enlighten us which planet he lives on???
"If India could be given a waiver and considered for full membership of the NSG, Pakistan has no lesser credentials."
My fellow Indians have answered this, but I want to point out that the Pakistani Government under Musharaff has admitted to the proliferation and had held and later gave immunity to AQ Khan.
So, Pakistani role in the proliferation of nuke knowhow is settled.
How does that, then, make Pakistan's credentials as worthy of India's?
This baffles me!
You could have used the NATO GLOC issue to bargain for a nuclear deal :-)
It is an unequal world...end of story.
I think the author deserve a much worse response than the above replies. There is a limit to delusions.
If wishes were horses.
It is hard to imagine Pakistan become a successful state when one encounters such silly and unrealistic articles.
You shouldnt start an article with such a blatant lie "Nuclear power is one of the most efficient, reliable and environment-friendly sources of energy, " when the victims of Chernobyl Blasts have other opinions.....It causes lot of problems due to radiation....In TN,locals are dead against the construction of Kudankulam power plant.... Also I think you might not have read about the Tsunami in Japan and the damage caused to their reactors
Besides,having a nuclear power plant is like showing an enemy that you have an atom bomb in your country and they need to do is to fire a missile at them to cause severe collateral damage....Not particularly good for a country having India,Afghanistan,Iran as neighbors and safe havens for mujahideen brothers.....They wont hesitate to target when they're being betrayed by the state of Pakistan
Things mentioned in the article is very routine constant whining by ordinary Pakistanis, i thought there ignorance should be forgiven as they no idea how some things work in this world.But when i read the author is Phd scholar at an University in Pakistan, i had no words. Ignorance and jingoistic nationalism has even spread to even the most educated people in Pakistan.
This column takes the cake when it comes to "delusional" logic.
There is vast difference between India and Pakistan record on nuclear. India has undisputed record of not selling or bartering technology. Pakistan was in world market to sell or barter nuclear technology. There is possibility of material ending up in the hand of terrorist.
@3rdRockfromtheSun: 100% agree with you.. good and just analysis
Pakistan chose to bracket itself with Iran, Libya and N. Korea. So, it got the same deal as those in its bracket. No comparison with India as India is in a different bracket. As it stands today, Pakistan may get nuclear technology for power generation on the same terms as being offered to Iran, i.e., no nuclear weapons and nuclear technology for power generation only, and that too only after it has rolled back its nuclear weapons program and all its existing nuclear weapons are completely destroyed. When leaders of DPC are openly issuing threats of revolt within the Army and few high ranking officers from Army have already joined DPC, and so many terror organizations operating freely without fear of arrest or conviction under the law, everyone is concerned about the safety of nuclear weapons in Pakistan.
"The fast depleting fossil fuel reserves are forcing several countries, including some of the oil-rich ones, to shift towards nuclear power to ensure long-term energy security"
This is a very motivated and erroneous article pushing the lines of the deep state which wants more nuke technology to build more lethal nuclear bombs and not energy.
There is plenty of natural gas and coal reserves in the world to last more than 500 years. More and more gas and coal deposits are being discovered every year. The price of coal and natural gas are at a historical low due to the global glut that is expected to last for a very long time. Pakistan itself is sitting on vast deposits of coal in the Thar desert region.
Nuclear energy has very serious long term environmental radiation pollution risks as shown by the Chernobyl, Three-Mile Island, Japan etc. nuclear accidents. When the capital, operating and waste disposal costs are taken into account, nuclear energy is a lot more expensive than energy derived from conventional fossil fuel.
All that sounds good, but you forgot to mention Pakistan's proliferation record which is solely the reason behind its nuclear isolation.
"Nuclear power is one of the most efficient, reliable and environment-friendly sources of energy"
Joke of the century.
Its actually neither of the three.
"If India could be given a waiver and considered for full membership of the NSG, Pakistan has no lesser credentials. "
I am sorry. But is there no limit to Pakistan's delusion?
First of all, Pakistan's nuclear technology is stolen from Europe by A Q Khan.
Second, Pakistan openly threatens India of first nuke usage.
Third, Pakistan's nonproliferation track record is THE WORST in the world.
I wonder, why are Pakistanis so delusional even in the most apparent of things.
What a tall claim! Impressive!
However, Author conviniently forgets following:
1) Father of Paksitan's Nuclear programme confessed on live TV that he had sold Nuclear technology to North Koreans! No similar confession from Indian side to allow "Non-discriminatory" approach for Paksitan.
2) Nuclear power is Expensive. Especially its Capital cost. i.e. Upfront investment. While it is facing Power shortage, what would make sense - investing same moneys for more Power in alternative sources or Nuclear?
3) Nuclear power is anything but environment friendly.
4) Pakistan's Power issue is abount Capacity utilisation - not additional capacity as shortage is caused by poor distribution (theft) and Circular debt - not shortage of installed capacity. It might help if Pakistan rather focus its efforts in solving that issue rather then asking for more Nuclear power!
To those that believe that AQ Khan was the only one involved in the proliferation scam, I have a bridge to sell you. That he could hoodwink the entire security establishment in Pakistan over many years, and carry on his 'personal network' of selling the stuff to others is astounding. Let us look at one of the things he is accused of : he apparently managed to have a PAF C-130 full of "nuclear contraband" flown from Pakistan to N Korea - and the govt claims it was done without their knowledge. Imagine that : to requisition a military cargo plane, its pilots & support staff, the airport & air traffic control, overfly permissions, landing & fuelling rights in China (as the plane cannot make the flight without refuelling halts and the Chinese not questioning what the cargo is), not to mention security & staff from whatever "nuclear facility" the stuff was stolen from, and the transport of said stolen stuff to the airport and loading onto the plane - all this done without the knowledge of Pakistan govt. And govt of Pakistan expects the rest of the world to believe it! Wow - is he AQ Khan or Dumbledore? AQ Khan was a scapegoat and "punished (house arrest!)" by your govt - they didn't let the Americans or others question Khan, because that would mean letting the cat out of the bag - i.e, the govt itself was the main culprit. The Americans and the global community know that, and hence do not trust you. So before demanding any "fair" treatment on the nuclear issue, please know what the background is!
pi, Who give to your beloved izrael and who provided to tiny miny englend and how ruzzia got or china have it please open your eyes we know the history of all drama of proliferation and reason for mother in law relation with pakistan is just one we are mussalman.
Hmm about Abdul Qadeer Khan (and his support network)? Why would a special waiver be given to a country that is a known weapons proliferator. India only recieved an exemption because it had a good track record in this area despite not being party to the NPT.
You have got to be kidding me.... !!!
How is nuclear power environmentally friendly? Where does the spent nuclear fuel go? Pakistan is very good at allocating resources to develop nuclear technology, but what if there is an accident for example? We dont have the resources to provide either precautionary or reactive support to our population that may be affected. Pakistan's experience with dealing with nuclear waste is hardly good either, given that radioactive waste has been dumped in Dera Ghazi Khan: http://dawn.com/2012/03/30/villagers-move-sc-against-dumping-of-n-waste/
As for KANUPP, it has had several accidents, that thankfully have not caused wider damage.