That additional finance alone won’t solve the problem was vividly illustrated by the embarrassment caused to the World Bank by the spectacular failure of its large social action programme, or SAP, in Pakistan. This multi-donor, multibillion dollar program was aimed at giving a major lift to the educational sector in the country by increasing the rate of enrollment for both boys and girls, by building new schools in the rural areas so that children didn’t have to walk long distances to attend classes, to provide better trained teachers, and to improve the quality of instruction by using better textbooks. The program’s intentions were good but the reason for its almost total failure was its implementation.
In the initial stages, the programme concentrated on the province of Punjab. The education department in Lahore, the provincial capital, had a poor reputation. It was under the influence of the political forces that put pressure on its officials to employ their friends and relatives or to move those who were already working in the system to more desirable places. To use a jargon of the time, the provincial education department was focusing on “postings and transfers” of teachers as its principal function. An enormous growth in the availability of funds in the system because of the resources provided by the SAP led to a sharp rise in the level of departmental corruption which was already high. The program because of these design failures was eventually abandoned by the Bank and other members of the donor community.
However, failed efforts such as these created an opportunity for women with good education, with access to family funds, and with children of their own to step in and establish institutions which they would manage themselves. Their own children and the children of their friends and relatives were their first batch of students. Mona Kasuri from a well established political and business family was one of the pioneers in this area in Pakistan and her performance is an excellent example of the marriage of entrepreneurship to the availability of opportunity.
Some of the more impressive school systems in Pakistan started modestly with the founding-mother creating a facility over which she could watch as her own children were being taught. Some of these ventures were begun in the homes of the budding education-entrepreneurs. These modest institutions grew from the pre-school and kindergarten stage to the primary stage and to the high school stage. In one case — in the case of the school started by Mrs Kasuri — its development took it to the university stage. The Beaconhouse school system is said to be one of the world’s largest: having received an infusion of a significant amount of foreign capital provided by a private equity fund it has gone beyond Pakistan’s borders and established — in some cases acquired — school systems in Africa, the Far East and Britain. The owners of this for-profit educational system have ploughed back some of their accumulated earnings by giving a large donation for the establishment of a liberal arts university called Beaconhouse National University. BNU, specialising in liberal arts, has concentrated on the subjects that attracted women and for which there were growing markets. It is providing instruction in communications, IT, visual arts, architecture and economics.
This one example provides a good illustration of how women’s advanced education and acquisition of modern skills have begun to change the social and political landscape. Well qualified women with right kinds of skills have decided not to stay at home and build and care for their families. They are increasingly becoming professionals and occupying high level positions. Some economists maintain that supply creates its own demand and that has indeed happened in the case of Pakistan with some significant changes in public policy. For several decades after independence, Pakistan did not admit women into what were called the “superior services”. These included the Civil Service of Pakistan and the Pakistan Foreign Service. That ban on the recruitment of women was lifted a couple of decades ago and now women have advanced to the senior most echelons in both services. According to a paper written recently by a female diplomat, there are now more than a dozen women serving as ambassadors around the globe.
It is, therefore, fair to conclude that even in a country which is presently in a severe depressed condition, women’s educational and work performance may offer one hope for a better future. By relegating women for so long to the back benches, Pakistan was operating its economy with one hand tied to back. That hand has now been loosened and may contribute to the country’s revival.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 9th, 2012.
COMMENTS (13)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Hedgefunder: I could not survive in that closed and intolerant society, therefore I migrated to USA. Whatever I wrote in my previous comments was the result of study of the american past and experience with the human developement here.
I still feel the pangs of agony which all Pakistanis go through when they see the injustice prevailing all arround in that society. Plesae chase mullah, politicians , ignorance and religious intolerence to re-rail the society. Educate , educate , educate and educate your youngs.
@knownot: I admire your comment ! I only wish that 180 million of your fellow Citizens have same vision and dreams for the future, as then perhaps the Future may be be Bright.
Though I did not afford to educate my children in Beaconhouse ( many of my Railways colleagues however did) but I still believe that the development of any society is indebted to the entrepreneurs – an activity which unfortunately is synonymous with capitalism. In spite of its huge drawbacks and creation of wealth gap the human species are progressing because of this "mutation" Pakistanis as a nation has made blunders but those who are taking these enterprises are not at fault but the political leaders, whose responsibility is to make public policy, are definitely the real culprits.
The article 'Changing the Landscape' (The Express Tribune - Pakistan) does present an encouraging picture about the women in Pakistan and this is indeed a development which deserves full appreciation. The writer Shahid Javed Burki; who is a former Vice President of the World Bank and in addition has held the post of caretaker Finance Minister of Pakistan; has rightly addressed the issue of girls having been deprived of higher education in the past. This has been due to various reasons financial and social. The financial reason having been fund constraints and social being the lack of awareness with regard to the importance of a woman's education. This infact has been a major practice not just in Pakistan but in the entire South Asia as the girl child was treated as one who would be married off and would be a part of another family whereas the boy was to be the person who would carry forward the generation of the family. This mindset in the societies of South Asia has been the major cause. India too, has passed through a similar phase. It is now with the growing awareness that people in South Asia that includes Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and other countries that the 'landscape of society' is changing. Women and Child Development can and should be taken up as a subject at international levels too and the South Asian Nations can work together by chalking out a joint programme in this regard. The change within the society of Pakistan wherein women and girls are allowed to now appear in the Civil Service Examinations and Foreign Service is probably an excellent beginning. However, the need is to develop this concept and create an awareness at the grass root levels in the villages within Pakistan. Feudal practices with regard to treating women as a doormat or lower being continue in the rural belts of not just Pakistan but the entire South Asia which needs to be checked and the mindset of the people to be changed. The feudal structure of the South Asian societies despite the influx of education and advancement in the field of Science and Technology the basic streak of male chauvinism has not changed to the desired level.
Why has the author decided to evade the issue of selective education and the fictional syllabus that are taught to the young for decades? What he states is only relevant to very small minority of the population of the Nation ! They are still burning Girls Schools. within the Country and not much action is being taken !!!!
I wish the situation was as rosy as the author says. Yes, in large cities the well offs have improved their lot, but not that much. The situation is especially alarming in rural areas due to social and cultural obstacles. One of the most deplorable aspects is that in some places, THis is controversial indeed. particularly northern tribal areas, the education of girls is strictly prohibited on religious grounds. Unfortunately, the government has not so far taken any steps to promote literacy or girls= education in these areas. It is even reluctant to help NGOs or other small political or religious parties do the job, because in order to maintain control, it needs the support of these landlords and chieftains who, as members of the two major political parties, are regularly elected to the national assembly. The bottom line is the economic independence of women. That is not taking place. As long as men decide what women can or cannot do, the situation will remain dismal. The current government has promoted women to key jobs which is encouraging, if anything.
@Max: Thanks for the detailed response. I understand what you are saying now. I have some follow-up questions, however. I would definitely reach out to moderators to get your contact. Regards.
@Falcon: Madam/Sir: I agree that my words are little stronger than before. This, however, mean no disrespect to Mr. Burki, rather it is the other way around. I am not sure what profession you belong to, but in academia, it is a norm and not abberation. Now your point: I am not sure if I will agree with your assertion and I am saying this with all due respect. Education is not a commodity that can be bought or sold at a market place. It falls into the category of "General Welfare," and thus state has the primary responsibility to deliver it. Given the financial constraints of the Pakistani state (some self-inflicted) it is not in a position to deliver the goods and services without some assistance from multilateral donors including the World Bank. My primary thrust was Mr. Burki's assertion that female education has made progress because of private institutions like Beaconhouse. That just threw me out. The reductionist approach just does not work in social sciences. We have to be holistic and incorporative to understand the phenomenon. I am also little uncomfortable in using the "trickle down" metaphor in things that fall under "general public welfare" category. Supply-side economists look at things more pragmatically than these are actually in the real world. Hope this answers your question. Should you have a follow-up question, I would request the moderators to pass on my e mail address to you. Moderators: Please do the needful. Thank you.
@Max I completely agree with you Max. Mr Burki's memorable phrase:"Pakistan was operating its economy with one hand tied to back." refers to the lack of participation of women in its economy. But much more significant is that this same concept applies on a far greater scale if the Pakistani masses are under-educated. Then all they are capable of is menial labour. Compare the contribution made by the masses in Turkey and Pakistan to see this clearly.
The fault for this lies with the Pakistani elite, who deliberately under-educate their masses in order to maintain their perks and privileges...a feudal concept. The Pakistani state is moving inexorably to the edge of the precipice, a consequence of the law of natural selection as it applies to human societies. Similar movements are occurring simultaneously throughout the Islamic world, and the momentous significance of this pattern is only incompletely appreciated. The Prophet had urged us to seek knowledge. Soon we shall see what are the consequences for disregarding this teaching.
Max identified the critical shortcomings of the article. Would Shahid Javed Burki be able to post a rejoinder to the devastating critique of his article by Max?
I also must mention that your essay lacks logical consistencies, and fails to develop a correlation between private schools and academic success of female students. How can you attribute the failing school system as the one that spurred the women educational achievements? Women are just working hard compared to their male counterparts and it is all over the world. Their academic success can also be ascribed to several exogenous factors including a change in social perspectives, structural changes in the family and in society at large, and slow erosion of gender differentiation. This change is equally visible in almost all advance industrial societies. Twenty years back there were more male students in my classes and now I see more female students. Sometimes I just end up with only one or two male students in a class of 25-30. I have also seen that women students are more focused, listen to your lecture more carefully, raise some interesting questions and do better than their male counterparts. The men, on the other hand and with few exceptions behave more like boys all around the world. I also must clear that I am a male, am a product of schools that you looked down, and am teaching at an institution that is funded by the tax-payers of the state. My students come from all social backgrounds. Some probably from families where it was not difficult for their parents to send them to private IV schools on the east-coast, but majority comes from regular middle-class background where their parents and they have to struggle to meet their financial needs. Life is quite tough Burki Sahib, but only if you come out of high-rise of the World Bank.
@Max: First of all, let me say that your feedback is slightly more harsh than the usual calm response. Secondly, in terms of education, let's tie the economic and social dimensions of the issue. There is no doubt about the fact (as you mentioned) that we need to equalize education opportunities in Pakistan for the rich and poor. But how things usually work, in case of any private sector driven change in any sector, initial price hike is the norm. Over time, as industry matures and competitors strive for market share, price cutting starts which makes things affordable for the masses. In a country, where education is not even a priority for any Govt, this is still a good start. Now, we have to move to the second step and determine steps for accelerating the commoditization of Beacon House quality education so that it is accessible by poor segments of the society as well. This needs partnership between private sector and govt. sector along with inputs of experts (like yourself and Dr. Burki) to make it an achievable goal.
"Most South Asian states did not have the funds in the amounts needed, qualified teachers in the numbers desired and textbooks of the quality parents demanded should be used to teach their children." "However, failed efforts such as these created an opportunity for women with good education, with access to family funds, and with children of their own to step in and establish institutions which they would manage themselves.: Serious sentence structure problem in both of the above quotes. It is actually all over the essay. Now the theme of the essay: So the funds did not reach the countryside because of bureaucratic reasons mentioned by the author? Let me put this in a different way. How about if I say that these funds were actually not destined for public schools, but only to establish private schools. A clear urban upper-middle class bias and another way to lower the self-esteem among children going to public schools. Does Mr. Burki know how much these highly funded schools charge as tuition and how many parents can actually afford tosend their children to schools like Beaconhouse? So is the policy not skewed in favor of upper segments of society and whose children take a great pride in calling themselves "elit." Sir! You cannot bring structural changes in a society unless you water the grassroots. The system that you are bragging about has divided the society among small percentage of haves and rest at their own. Is this not enough to fuel the existing frustrations of the lower middle classes and particularly those at the bottom. Is this not what is generating religious fundamentalism in Pakistan? Sir! Unable to find a place in school system these kids fall into the hands of Madrissa monsters. Hope this give you enough to think about the average person and how to diffuse the growing tension in the society. Hate to say but I am highly disappointed by your essay. Nothing but a typical neo-liberal (economics) mantra of the World Bank.