Constitutional amendment: ANP refuse to budge on dual nationality bill

Says will oppose the bill if certain changes were not made to the proposed law.


Irfan Ghauri July 08, 2012

ISLAMABAD:


The fate of a proposed dual nationality law, which requires an amendment to the Constitution, hangs in the balance as a key ally in the ruling coalition has refused to support the new legislation.


Support from the Awami National Party (ANP), an important ally of the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), is crucial for amending the Constitution, which requires two-third votes in both houses of parliament.

The ANP has proposed some changes in the draft bill which, if incorporated, will change the nomenclature of the proposed amendment, which the government wants to introduce as the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution during the ongoing session of the National Assembly.

Senator Haji Adeel, who is part of the ANP team that has been holding negotiations with the government, told The Express Tribune that his party has proposed amendments to be incorporated in the bill.

The ANP believes that a dual national cannot hold any important public office, including the offices of the president and prime minister, key posts in the military, judiciary, bureaucracy and other sensitive departments.

“We want an amendment to the bill barring dual nationals from holding important offices. We also want it to be applicable to top civil bureaucrats of grade 21 and 22,” he added.

If the government wants to give overseas Pakistanis an opportunity to take part in the elections, then the amendment should make it clear that either before taking part in the polls or immediately after getting elected they would have to renounce their second nationality.

The Mutahida Qaumi Movement (MQM), which is the main mover of this bill, is pressing the government on the amendment, while the ANP and PML-Functional are opposing it.

Already short of numbers, the government is also facing stiff resistance from the PML-N and its ally PML-likeminded group.

Sources said the already fractured PML-Q also fears defections on this issue.

Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated "grade 21 and 21" instead of "grade 21 and 22". A correction has been made. 

Published in The Express Tribune, July 8th, 2012.

COMMENTS (23)

Suhail | 11 years ago | Reply

It is hilarious that this law was promulgated by a dictator whose own Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz was a dual nationality holder and where is written in constitution of Pakistan that a dual nationality holder can not be MNA... Which law said that a dual citizen cannot be a MNA? Pakistan changed its citizenship act retroactively in 2002 to allow dual citizenship of 16 countries including USA. Which law did the PCO judges use? No law at all. The as usual took over the function of the legislature and created a new Law for the land of the Pure. Judicial activism is just directed to target PPP parliamentarians and members. If Supreme Court passes ruling against dual nationality it should also pass a ruling according to which No MNA, or MPA can send his/ her family abroad either for education or settlement but court will never do because their own families are living abroad and their children are studying in foreign institutions..

Naeem Haider | 11 years ago | Reply

Wondering why there is so much fuss over dual nationality issue. There are about 89 countries in the world that does not bar holding dual nationality so there is no harm in double-nationality. It is unfortunate that legislatures are always subjected to accountability in one or the other case and other pillars of state always try to tight noose around the elected members. There are several top military officials and judges that enjoy dual nationality but no finger is pointed towards them. They are free to do whatever they want. But, lamentably everyone holds responsible just politicians not ” Deep State” and ” Honest” judges who are more politicians than those who are in politics in guise of their respective positions. Second, ECP must ponder on facilitating local voters who are living far off from poling stations. For this purpose, ECP must launch mobile poling stations instead of facilitating those left the country in lurch. Moreover,” Indigenous Voters” are inexpensive as compared to expatriates for whom ECP shall have to bear heavy expenditures.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ