The Supreme Court on Saturday formed a five-member larger bench to hear the National Reconciliation Order (NRO) implementation case next week.
Constituted by Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, the five-member larger bench will be headed by Justice Asif Saeed Khosa and comprise Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan, Justice Ejaz Ahmed Chaudhry, Justice Gulzar Ahmed and Justice Muhammad Ather Saeed.
The apex court is set to take up NRO-related cases on July 12 – the deadline for Prime Minister Raja Pervaiz Ashraf to decide whether to comply with the orders of court by writing a letter to Swiss authorities to reopen corruption cases against President Asif Ali Zardari.
During the last date of hearing on June 27, a three-member bench headed by Justice Nasirul Mulk, stated in its written order: “… the new prime minister was elected last week and we trust him that he will honour the direction given by this court.In the meantime we direct the attorney general of Pakistan (Irfan Qadir) to seek instructions from the prime minister and inform the court on the next date of hearing ie on July 12”.
Head of the newly formed five-member bench, Justice Khosa was also one of the seven judges who tried and convicted former prime minister Yousaf Raza Gilani for not complying with its orders to write the Swiss letter.
Justice Khosa’s separate note containing Khalil Gibran’s revolutionary poetry in the detailed judgment regarding Gilani’s conviction was also widely discussed.
Before the constitution of the seven-judge bench for the trial of Gilani, Justice Khosa was heading a five-judge NRO implementation bench of the Supreme Court and had set six options for the implementation of the court order on the NRO and referred the matter to the chief justice for constitution of the larger bench.
The chief justice then constituted the seven-judge bench that initiated contempt of court proceedings against Gilani and subsequently convicted him of contempt.
Following that, a three-judge bench, hearing identical petitions against the National Assembly speaker’s ruling in favour of Gilani, set aside her decision and dismissed Gilani as the country’s prime minister.
The chief justice observed in the detailed order of the case that a “dangerous precedent” would be set if the highest executive of the country would not comply with court orders, paralysing the judicial system of the country.
The new prime minister faces similar pressure, as the court turned down an international immunity plea by the government for the office of the president. The court stated that writing a letter to the Swiss authorities regarding the Supreme Court’s decision, declaring the NRO annulled, has nothing to do with presidential immunity.
Swiss authorities shelved the NRO cases in 2008 when two letters were written by then attorney general Malik Muhammad Qayyum after a deal was inked between then military regime of Pervez Musharraf and the ruling Pakistan Peoples Party.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 8th, 2012.
COMMENTS (11)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
1714024018-0/ModiLara-(1)1714024018-0-270x192.webp)
@Snausher: 'Precedent' is right in front of us. four treason events supported by the judiciary, Bhutto's judicial murder, support to terrorism via court system, murderers garlanded, judges fearful, police beaten up right in the courts. Present government is worst but to strengthen judiciary on cherry picking cases and interpreting constitution where no sane person can support. Judiciary could have improve its image while being neutral there is extreme contradiction and this is taking Pakistan to dangers of its existence. Any extremism among the institutions is going to be destructive and as usual credit will go to judiciary. Respect is in hearts not by fear and our judges should create atmosphere to make space in the hearts without bullying.
@azad: You should know Zardari is most corrupt man in the history of Pakistan. Ok carry on respecting him, one day you might get some ministry or advisory in the govt because he needs this kind of people who praise him
@Anonymous: I think the whole nation should stand by the court and help the "justice" to be prevailed in our beloved country Pakistan
@AnisAqeel: And what about the precedent which are being set by the govt by not complying with the court orders? What about the rediculism of the judiciary which is being carried out by the govt? I think we should be honest when we talk about the country. This govt has destroyed our Pakistan and we have people among us who still praise this govt......strange
@Khalq e Khuda: can you you please give advise to Govt as well to comply with the court orders and then focus on nation's other issues. I think rather then putting pressure on courts and criticising them, if we are honest then we should put pressure on the govt to comply with the court orders no matter they like these courts or not but they should set good precedent.
They say "Justice must be served even if heavens fall"
This will warn any future govts that if they go against the law they will be punished! Supreme court should not let anyone disobey the law whether it is the common citizen of pakistan or the prime minister.
We are with you CJ
Here we go again! I'm sure there are other important cases Supreme Court can pay attention to for a while. The new PM will not write the letter and the country cannot afford ouster of another one. So please PCO Chaudhry spend sometime on cleansing other state institutions: there are plenty to chose from!