In a letter to congressional defense committees, the Pentagon requested "reprogramming" $8.2 billion in funds previously approved to finance more urgent priorities, officials said.
There were "some unanticipated costs that we just didn't foresee," spokesman Captain John Kirby told reporters.
It remained unclear what programs in the defense budget would receive less funding as a result.
A large portion of the request was due to the costs "associated with the extended closure of the ground lines of communication" in Pakistan, Kirby said.
In November, Pakistan shut its border to NATO supply convoys bound for Afghanistan after a US air strike accidentally killed 24 Pakistani soldiers.
The Pentagon reportedly estimates an alternative network of northern supply routes through Central Asia has generated $2.1 billion in additional fuel costs compared to the shorter Pakistani route.
The request to shift funds was also needed to cover the cost of deploying an additional aircraft carrier to the Gulf region.
"Earlier this year, we did increase the carrier presence there," said Kirby, with the US Navy moving from one to two aircraft carriers present in the area at all times.
The expanded naval deployment came amid rising tensions with Iran, which in December and January threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz in response to increased international pressure over its nuclear program.
The US Air Force also had to pay for more "flying hours" partly related to the closure of the Pakistan routes, as the military has had to rely more on cargo aircraft to ferry in supplies to the US-led force in Afghanistan, officials said.
US continues work with Pakistan on GLOCs
The State Department on Monday said the United States continues to work with Pakistan on the issue of reopening the country's key land routes that transport supplies into and out of landlocked Afghanistan.
Spokesperson Victoria Nuland confirmed that Deputy Secretary of State Thomas Nides held talks with Pakistani officials. The two countries, she said, have been talking on wide-ranging issues including working on supply lines, adding that "that work continues."
"We don't have anything in particular to announce today," she said when asked if a deal is imminent on reopening the routes, closed by Islamabad about seven months ago.
The spokesperson also said US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made a telephonic call to new Pakistan Prime Minister Raja Pervaiz Ashraf " to wish him well in his new post." In her call, Secretary Clinton also "noted that we want to continue our engagement and work through the issues " the two countries still have, the spokesperson said.
COMMENTS (10)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Despite the prospect that Pakistan would reopen the supply routes to Afghanistan, the U.S. is still wary that Islamabad might face more unpopularity and change its mind, since this decision might stoke further resentments among the anti-American public.
@Ussama Yaqub: You forgot to mention that the current account deficit is 15 trillion dollars and rapidly approaching 16 trillion dollars. By any measurement a lot of debt. Further, overall debt, which includes unfunded liabilities, but not State debt, is approxiametly 200 trillion dollars. I think we can safely say that America is in over its head and needs to watch its pennies. However, Pakistan should not have to subsidize America forever. Need I say more?
To all the commentators, lambasting American "irrationality", last time I checked, USA was a 15 trillion dollars economy. Do the maths, 8 billion dollars additional cost is less than 0.05% of their total GDP. While we try to be so "rational" and lament for the "American Tax Payers", think of poor miserable Pakistan which has so far spent $5 billion over a block of ice (Siachin)
I see a silver lining for Mr. Zardari and his elected government. With a single phone call from Mr. Bush to Mushy (establishment at that time) gave unlimited access to the USA inside Pakistan. Today, Mr. Zardari (elected) in a clever manner boxed the establishment by asking the NA form an agreement to open the land route. The first time ever an elected government has defied the USA. Now the establishment is going to open the route against the NA resolution.
Amazing isn't it? America will not apologize, several Congressmen are suggesting that Pakistan should not receive so called American aid, and now the Pentagon is asking for an extra 8.2 billion fuel money. One wonders what their total increase in costs really are? Methinks an apology would be the lower cost way to go. Moving on, Hilary states that Pakistan/America are working through their differences. What she does not mention is that Pakistan is really upset with America and that America will go on its arrogant way determined to upset everybody, and kill innocent people . Does America really believe that other countries should take them seriously? If what America is doing was not so tragic somebody could make a comedy film out of U.S nonsense.
Pakistan was not important, as we had been repeatedly told by the US, NATO and India. I guess they have discovered reality now. But the snub to Pres.Zardari at NATO summit at Chicago is unacceptable and unforgivable. I don't think much of Zardari but as the Head of State, Obama and the rest of the crowd in Chicago should have behaved better. I think Pakistan routes should remain closed and we will see who comes out ahead in 2 years, says Baby.
A $2.1 billion additional cost for the US, yet they are unwilling to offer apology. They must hate their own taxpayers.
Please don't open these routes. Let Americans and NATO pay more for Mr. Panetta's arrogance. This was the head line on ET back in May, " NATO supply routes: Panetta says US will not be price ‘gouged’ ". They can pay billions more to those nations who have lost almost nothing as compared to Pakistan but when Pakistan asks for a fair price it becomes gouging. Wonderful. Makes obvious the way we've been selling ourselves to the icons of civilization.
Americans are crazy. For a tenth of this amount of money they could buy all of Pakistan, its army and the beautiful women. They already bought the politicians.
So 8 Billion dollars in just 6-7 months of blockade. hmmm. The Americans & their Pakistani mouthpieces (don't read fake liberals please) boast of the 20 Billion dolllars aid to Pakistan (half of which is actually CSF reimbursements). So if Pakistan hadn't extended logistic support to US after 2001, they would have lost nearly 120 Billion dollars only in logistics (assuming 10 Billion dollars per year). This means that actually Americans saved 100 Billion dollars because of Pakistan's support. And what Pakistan got in return? 1) 11 years long unflinched American support first for a dictator & then for a corruption guru who have both ruined the fabric of the country. 2) More than 35000 Pakistanis including 5000 soldiers dead. 3) Economy nose-diving due to precarious security situation for taking part in the US War of Terror. and guess what; the whole 20 Billion dollars aid also didn't reach Pakistani people. Most of it went to the coffers of the corrupt ruling elite (both civvies and uniformed). Alas.