Sharmeen Obaid did not fulfil promise of Rs3m, plastic surgery: Acid victim

Rukhsa­na says she has sent legal notice, filmma­ker denies all allega­tions.

Ema Anis June 28, 2012

Acid victim Rukhsana, featured in Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy’s Oscar winning documentary Saving Face, has alleged that the filmmaker promised to give her Rs3 million and a house, and also promised to help her with plastic surgery for working in the film, but did not fulfil any of her promises.

Rukhsana told the media that Obaid-Chinoy made her sign blank papers but a year has passed and none of her promises have been fulfilled. “In our family we wear the topi-burqa... When she [Obaid-Chinoy] got the Oscar, the film was shown across the world. When my husband saw it, he expelled me from the house and even my parents stopped talking to me,” Rukhsana said.

The acid victim also claimed that she had sent a legal notice to the filmmaker through a lawyer.

A trend “JusticeForRukhsana” also started trending on Twitter after media reports covering Rukhsana’s allegations were published. The reports claimed that Obaid-Chinoy had promised Rukhsana Rs3 million, construction of a house on 5 Marla (approx 150sq-ft) plot in Multan and plastic surgery.

Obaid-Chinoy, while talking to Express News, said that no documentary-maker would ever promise anything because it is unethical. “I have made 16 films in 10 countries and nothing of this sort has ever happened.”

She however added that a donor had expressed his desire of getting Rukhsana a house after watching the film. “The donor wanted Rukhsana to be given a house as money can be snatched by anyone. Rukhsana, her husband and her children even went to see the house. We even have the pictures. But her husband refused to take the house and told Rukhsana that she can get more money instead.”

When asked about Rukhsana’s allegations of her identity being revealed through the film, Obaid-Chinoy said that Rukhsana was filmed in her village in front of her parents. “Her parents were interviewed, her husband was also interviewed. If they did not know about the film, how come they are interviewed in it?”

She also clarified that she had not received any legal notice from the acid victim. “On what basis will I get a legal notice? Does she have any papers or documents? Legal cases can only be initiated when you have some proof... Why would I make her sign blank pages? What would I want from her?”

The filmmaker also questioned why Rukhsana is coming on the media and levelling allegations against her after so many months had passed since she received the Oscar. “When the Oscars took place, she went to newspapers and other media and told everyone that she was happy for informing the world about acid attacks. And now she is coming on the media to say that I had promised her things?”

But, she appealed that people should help Rukhsana as she is a victim. “We still want to help her, but our hands are tied. Victims and the Acid Survivors Foundation have moved a civil court appealing that Saving Face should not be aired in Pakistan. If I give money to Rukhsana through donors at this moment, won’t the court say that I’m bribing her to get my film aired?”

When asked about the royalty Rukhsana has demanded for working in her film, Sharmeen said, “What royalty? We had announced that whenever anyone watches the movie in Pakistan, the money would go to the victims. But the movie is not being allowed to run in the country.”

Obaid-Chinoy had also earlier insisted that the women featured in the film signed legal documents allowing the film to be shown anywhere in the world, including Pakistan.

Saving Face, a 40-minute film, focuses on Zakia and Rukhsana as they fight to rebuild their lives after being attacked by their husbands, and British Pakistani plastic surgeon Mohammad Jawad who tries to help repair their shattered looks.


Zahid Hussain | 9 years ago | Reply @Unkind 3nigma: Sharmeen has worked on one subject only, that is atrocity on Pakistani women by their own kins. This is a phenomen like of which hardly exists in other parts of the world. Her work is appreciable. As to other pathetical subjects, no one differs from your suggestion; they are equally, rather more important. Why not you please take a lead in writing something on toipics of your priority? As to foreign action in our northern area, you will be also covering what TTP is doing in our cities, mosques, religious places, police and army jawans. Our democratic rulers are well-aware of, and equally inactive, on either of two fronts: acid-throwers and TTP attackers.
Unkind 3nigma | 9 years ago | Reply

I'm amazed at the fact that our own so called Pakistani film or documentary makers don't highlight the issues that are caused by the western influence in Pakistan. They tend to highlight the worst in us rather than the worst that is done to us. I would have loved to see a documentary showing the plight of the people of our northern areas, how the so called Allies are bombing our children or how the stupidity of their actions in USSR vs Afghanistan caused our already in debt nation to face the task of feeding another 5 million plus refugees. But then again her documentary on such topic wouldn't have even been considered in the running let alone win an Oscar. I'm sorry to say this but Sharmeen you showed this bad side of our community at a very wrong time, its not that its not true and we shouldn't act to stop it but rather the fact that we as a nation are already in the lime light as worst of the worst. This documentary didn't help one bit to portray a better image of Pakistan.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read