LHC issues notices to Zardari over dual offices

Court hopes President would disassociate himself from political activities.


Web Desk June 22, 2012
LHC issues notices to Zardari over dual offices

LAHORE: The Chief Justice of the Lahore High Court on Friday issued a notice to President Zardari for simultaneously holding the offices of co-chairman Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and that of the President, in violation of an earlier order of the full bench of the court, Express News reported.

Justice Umar Ata Bandial issued the notice through the President’s principal secretary.

CJ also decided that a larger bench will hear the case from next hearing as a Constitutional and legal issue has been raised in the petition.

The petitioner’s counsel AK Dogar argued that the court should summon the President to explain his position, just as the Supreme Court called former Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani in contempt case.

At this, the CJ said the court had issued a notice to principal secretary and court will decide future course of action after the submission of reply by principal secretary. The CJ added that the court may summon the President if it so required.

Justice Bandial went on to say that the office of President is respectable and the LHC full bench had hoped that the President would disassociate himself from political activities, but this has not happened.

Prima facie contempt proceedings are initiated for not following courts’ orders.

The court will resume hearing by June 27.

 

COMMENTS (12)

Saqibtahir | 12 years ago | Reply

Bringing back an already settled issue tells the intentions. Souls of Zia and his judges are back in different bodies.

Jibran | 12 years ago | Reply

Once again LHC in action, and Punjabi judges in conspiracies and vendettas. Shamelessness at it peak. For someone else I would regard this as a new low, but for them its just a new middle.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ