Some unanswered questions

Can attorney general, in his investigation of the matter, be expected to re-visit alleged link between Riaz and CJP?

Editorial June 15, 2012

To call the Supreme Court’s suo motu hearing into the Arsalan Iftikhar bribery scandal a cover-up would be unfair. After all, the Court has clearly said that if it is established that the son-in-law of business tycoon, Malik Riaz, did indeed pay for the foreign trips of the chief justice’s son, then the matter should be investigated by the attorney general of Pakistan. But, at the same time, the short order spends some time on the importance of the Court’s reputation and how it must be protected at all costs. While there is no denying that that is the case, and all Pakistanis would want to see that happen, the matter more at hand was whether Malik Riaz’s very serious allegations against Arsalan Iftikhar were true or not. They seem to have been relegated given that the short order dwells in some detail on the matter of the Court’s reputation being besmirched in the eyes of the general public. Furthermore, if the matter has now been passed on to the attorney general, with the short order declaring that the court and the chief justice stand absolved of any links with Malik Riaz, can the attorney general, in his investigation of the overall matter, be expected to re-visit the alleged link? The short order also cites Malik Riaz’s contention that the money he gave to Arsalan Iftikhar did not gain him any relief in the Court. For one, this still does not address the issue that perhaps the businessman was saying this because he felt this was the only way out of the mess that he himself had perhaps created.

Another question that remains is whether any inquiry will be initiated into checking how the son of the chief justice, in the space of four years, managed to build a business, which, by his own admission, is worth some Rs900 million. So far, this case has embroiled the judiciary, the media and politicians. The one institution that has been missing is the military. Senior retired officers have worked for Bahria Town and while that is no crime at all, there has also been close cooperation, at times, between that entity and various defence housing authorities, which are headed by senior serving officers. If there is to be a transparent investigation into all aspects of this matter, it should cover all facets.

Published in The Express Tribune, June 16th, 2012.


ayesha_khan | 9 years ago | Reply @OH BOY!: "My question is what was the deepest darkest secret of Malik Riaz that Arsalan Chaudry was able to blackmail him and MR had to dish out money….OR…why did Malik Riaz give bribe?!" I think this question has been answered by Malik Riaz himself in his 'leaked video footage'. According to him, in present day corrupt Pakistan, no-one can do any business without providing grease money. This is something every business man does and this is what he was being blackmailed for. So more like an open secret about Pakistani business practices than a deep dark secret.
Max | 9 years ago | Reply

Your editorial well taken, the matter need to be thoroughly investigated and the culprits brought to justice. The players in this one act play are not just Mr. Bahria and the talented son but large number of people in positions of power(both civil and military, retired and serving), and obviously not to mention media (the so-called talk-show hosts). As far the retired Generals or civil bureaucrats working for government contractors, political scientists use a metaphor called "revolving door" where retired government employees are hired by contractors to have a friend in the court.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read