WASHINGTON:
The main condition Pakistan has set for reopening Nato supply routes is a ‘formal apology’ from the United States over last year’s deadly air raid on Pakistan’s border post – even though the apology may not be a possibility.
An official confirmed that Pakistan’s Foreign Office and Army wanted an apology for the airstrike by Nato warplanes on the Salala border post which killed over two dozen Pakistani troops in November.
“It’s not about the price,” the official told The Express Tribune, referring to reports that Islamabad and Washington had failed to agree on the cost per container that would be ferried to and from Afghanistan through Pakistani routes.
The official requested anonymity because he was not authorised to speak on record on the matter.
US officials have never said that there would be an apology, and nearly seven months after the strike, one has yet to be made. “That train left months ago,” said a source familiar with the discussions.
On Monday, the Pentagon announced that US negotiators would be leaving Pakistan after spending over 45 days trying to work out a deal to re-open the Ground Lines of Communication (GLOCs).
A former US official told The Express Tribune, “Given the time lag between the Salala strike and now, the US government has obviously determined to not apologise, despite repeated requests from Pakistan. The fact that Pakistan has few friends left in Washington shaped this decision.”
The official said that given the current circumstances, Pakistan should not expect Washington to offer an apology beyond the condolences it has already received.
“Ultimately, the failure to issue an unconditional and formal apology indicates just how strained ties have become – and at the most inopportune of times – when the US attempts to engineer its drawdown from Afghanistan.”
Meanwhile, Pakistan’s civilian government should ‘bite the bullet’ and reopen supply routes to Nato forces in order to ease tensions with the United States, a senior US official said on Tuesday.
“If the civilian government in Islamabad would bite the bullet and make the political decision to open the Ground Lines of Communication, that would deflect some of the negativity right now,” the official told Reuters.
(WITH ADDITIONAL REPORTING FROM REUTERS)
Published In The Express Tribune, June 13th, 2012.
Correction: In an earlier version of the story, the quote in the second paragraph was incorrectly attributed to a US official. The correction has been made.
COMMENTS (6)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
1713521455-0/Untitled-design-(9)1713521455-0-270x192.webp)
Clear indicator that whomever is advising the Pakistani govt doesn't have a clue about American intentions. Why go through all the rigamarole to adopt a policy when you know it's a dead end?
No apology then No re-opening of route. Its good for Pakistan not to open the route. Analysts say that since the closure of supply route there has been less suicide attacks and bombings in Pakistan, situation has improved a lot, so a sudden drop in attacks is a good sign. the only attacks which have increased are Drone-strikes. so if routes are open then more suicide attacks but if routes are closed then more drone strikes.
or Pakistan should repeat the same and say sorry first:)
An American Band called "Apology" should tour Pakistan +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ QED.