World Bank says about $1b of crops lost in floods

Floods in Pakistan may have destroyed crops worth around $1 billion, World Bank President Robert Zoellick said.


Reuters August 14, 2010
World Bank says about $1b of crops lost in floods

SIGULDA: Floods in Pakistan may have destroyed crops worth around $1 billion, World Bank President Robert Zoellick said on Friday, adding that the organisation was considering redirecting aid to the country.

Triggered by torrential monsoon downpours, the floods have swamped Pakistan’s Indus River basin, killing more than 1600 people, forcing two million from their homes and disrupting the lives of about 14 million people.

“An early assessment is that the damages are more than in the earthquake in 2005,” he told a news conference during a visit to Latvia. “The rough estimate is that there is a billion dollars of losses of crops. All of us will have to pitch in to help.”

Aid agencies said on Friday that water-borne disease outbreaks posed new risks to victims, with already around 36,000 suspected cases of potentially fatal acute watery diarrhoea reported so far.

Zoellick said he had word that a reconstruction needs assessment team had landed in Pakistan on Friday with representatives from the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank.

“We’ve already started to think about reprogramming some of our funding, and based on the government request, we are looking to see if we might reprogramme about $900 million,” Zoellick said after meeting the prime minister of Latvia.

Wheat, cotton and sugar crops have all suffered damage in a country where agriculture is a mainstay of the economy. The International Monetary Fund has warned of major economic harm and Pakistan’s finance ministry said the country would miss this year’s 4.5 per cent gross domestic product growth target although it was not clear by how much.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 14th, 2010.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ