Several factors have led to this downward slide. The problem is not merely of atmospherics but is the result of a combination of factors that are grounded in the country’s grim reality today. Some of the major policy and governance failures that have brought us to this pass could be linked to these factors: the inevitable consequence of a lack of investment in education and health; General Ziaul Haq’s disastrous legacy of using Islam to legitimise his rule, the consequences of which we continue to suffer. And, finally, our involvement in the war on terror after 9/11. The result has been domination of a warped national narrative by some fringe radical religious parties and a total absence of alternative ideologies by liberal and moderate forces. Our corrupt political leadership and civil society have both failed to mobilise society and provide a more humane vision of the state.
There has been a weakening of civil institutions by the military to retain grip on power as well as politicisation of state institutions by the civilian leadership to advance its narrow vested interests.
Central to this whole process is Pakistan’s inability to meet the challenge of modernisation in a globalised world. There are two ways of meeting that challenge: to compete and develop or to retreat and regress. Unfortunately, it is the second that we seem to have chosen.
Had Pakistan invested in education, our youth would be far more literate. Perhaps, the revolution we see elsewhere in the Muslim world might well have been led from here. The gloom we witness today is largely justified because our political leadership is too corrupt and too preoccupied with keeping itself in power to appropriate state resources and not invest effectively in a better future. They cannot provide inspirational leadership.
One of the most troubling aspects of today’s despair is that it is leaving us unprepared for the great challenges we will face in the coming years. Our population growth is unsustainable and if we continue to grow as we are, it is difficult to see how this country can sustain itself, let alone provide a better future for its citizens.
Crucial to understanding Pakistan’s troubled governance is the fact that the country has never had an institutionalised decision-making process for foreign policy and economic issues. Hence, there has been competition between civilian and military leaders for control of the national agenda; the confusion of authority has often led to poor decisions with damaging consequences for the country in the longer term. Exacerbating these problems is the ever-growing politicisation of the bureaucracy. This leads to decline in the capacity of the bureaucracy to provide objective and dispassionate advice to decision-makers and greatly undermines any meritocracy.
However, all is not lost: our judiciary, despite some inherent weakness, is acting to reassert the rule of law in many ways, which is fundamental to a just society. The media is robust and even parliament has come out with landmark constitutional amendments. And the military continues to retain high standards of professionalism despite great odds and overstretch.
The great challenge confronting Pakistani leaders is that they have to take some very uncomfortable decisions to steer the country away from these multiple crises. We, therefore, cannot afford the current civil-military divide and judiciary-executive tussle.
The question remains: will the next elections bring in a new set of leadership that will rise to the challenge and undertake bold reforms and take hard decisions? We have to wait and see.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 10th, 2012.
COMMENTS (28)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
..............the rot which we are faced with today has not left unscathed even the mightiest pillars of our redemption, witness today's statement of Malik Riyaz in the supreme court! The problem with our character is that, unlike that of the other countries, we are pathological liars; and there is big difference between what we say and what we practice. Without reforming the essentials which are at the back of our thought, action and behaviour, it does not seem possible to stem the rot!
@gp65:
Without going to the past, let us consider the present situation. A democratically elected government is in place for last over four years. If the government passes the buck to the Army to formulate policies, whom would you blame for that? And if the government is formulating policies, can the Army stop the government doing that? As someone said 'it is easy to be critical than to be correct', I suggest we need to see things in correct perspective.
@Nazir Ahmed: "@Ejaaz: In every country of the world input from military is taken to formulate national policies. There is nothing wrong with that."
Absolutely true. In Pakistan though the army does not provide 'input' through defence ministry , as it happens in other countries. Rather it is the primary decision maker with regards to the scurity policy and foreign policy. This is not common in other countries.
@Babloo:
“And the military continues to retain high standards of professionalism despite great odds and overstretch.”
Author seems to referring to the rank and file of the Army rather all Security Forces, who despite overall deterioration in all aspects of our national lives still deliver beyond call of duty. I have pondered over the results of operations against so called 'Taliban' particularly the operation in Malakand Division in recent past. No Army of the present day world could have dislodged the militants entrenched for years in the vast mountainous terrain of Dir, Swat, Buner and adjoining areas.
Acts of Army Chiefs like Zia and Musharraf who used their position to impose personal rule over the country getting ready response from willing politicians are most condemnable. Army as institution suffered the most during General’s rule working for the interests of Wall Street Establishment’s global interests in this region. Unfortunately our present civilian rulers are also working for those interests. @Ejaaz: In every country of the world input from military is taken to formulate national policies. There is nothing wrong with that.
@Riaz Haq
Only 55 (vs 58 Indians) made it to college out of which 39 (vs 31 Indians) graduated with a degree.
Does this include 'Graduate' MPAs and MNAs being hunted by the SC?
As of 2010, Harvard's Barro & Lee dataset shows that there are 380 (vs 327 Indians) out of every 1000 Pakistanis age 15 and above who have never had any formal schooling. Of the remaining 620 (vs 673 Indians) who enrolled in school, 22 (vs 20 Indians) dropped out before finishing primary school, and the remaining 598 (vs 653 Indians) completed it. There are 401 (vs 465 Indians) out of every 1000 Pakistanis who made it to secondary school. 290 (vs 69 Indians) completed secondary school while 111 (vs. 394 Indians) dropped out. Only 55 (vs 58 Indians) made it to college out of which 39 (vs 31 Indians) graduated with a degree.
The truth is every Shurfah of govt never tried to give pakistan a one system we divided like we were in 1892 so one is try to unite us on base of one educational system every pakistani ruller run the govt on ad hauk basis remember british survived from complete disapearing because they had running system even during the war.. and american help too.
A very balanced and seriously researched article one should read multiple times to grasp the spirit behind each word.But irony is the rulers and the waiting one have no capacity and guts to accept their failings and take corrective measures.
General Sahib, till we are in denial mode, nothing will change! We are a failed state & have lost everything. Priorities have to be changed. We are suppose to be a welfare state & not a security state. Why can't our establishment understand this?
In the whole article the word 'reform' has been used just once, that too at the end. I hope writers of columns read all the comments from the readers. The real problem with Pakistan is the century old colonial systems that we are still using after 65 years. There has not been a single Pakistani who pointed that fact out. Shame! We have police system that British created in 1861. All we need is reform of police and 80% of our problems will go away. If you don't believe me just read "police reforms in Georgia". It takes only few minutes. Georgia eliminated their corruption in less than ONE year.
@Riaz Haq I am sorry sir but I am sick of the cross-promotion of your blog on every single ET article.
Also what's with this comparison with India? Honestly It would have been better if you stated statistics from Pakistan only or at least gave mentioned some other countries too. By just mentioning India its like a childish whinging from your side. And 38% Pakistanis without schooling is not a very encouraging statistic.
Resiliency is a shameless word used for saying 'people here accept any crap' from its ruling class and won't raise up in revolt. They'll keep cleaning up the mess created by their Establishment & Intelligentsia.
Resiliency of people of sub-continent is overstated. All folks all over the world have it in them to adopt. Japanese faced the worst last year with Tsunami and their behavior was exemplary. That's resilience.
What we in subcontinent do is 'cowardice'. Not being able to stand up to our tormentors.
Its a country with HIV: the auto immune system is shot
@Riaz Haq: Thank you brother for bringing out facts and putting to shame all who would tarnish the image of Pakistan. Truth is bitter but ultimately a country of idolators like India can never be a match for Pakistan which is a Muslim country with intellectual giants like A Q Khan sahib and handsome talented leaders like Imran Khan, who will be our Khalifa.
Pakistan's analysts have a general proclivity of exonerating the military of the justified culpability by shifting all the blame on Zia ul Haq who they say had pursued a policy that brought disaster for the country. What these analysts deliberately never refer to or clearly point out is that it's the military that continues the same policy without having a second look into it. Until you identify this clearly, you're not likely to clean up the mess.
@ Riaz Haq,
50% of Pakistan's education is based on madrassa system- which is as good as useless. That leaves pakistan 50% plus un-educated.
@Riaz Haq: Useless comparison between India and Pakistan, because India is a bigger country with more to address. Such India-centric analysis to deflect responsibility could be added to the article as one of the major reasons for such articles getting written.
@Riaz Haq It is a good sign that so many children go to school. In India, we have these great figures but little is said about the quality of education and how many of the children actually complete their education. A question, since I have not seen the Harvard study. Does its figures include children in madrasas as well?
The general, surprisingly, this time, for a change not advised or stressed upon Pakistan to behave,act or obey USA otherwise in every talk show or in a article always acted like parrot to obey the boss.Now slaved foreign policy has changed and credit goes to Zardari and Kayani due to repeated humiliation of Pakistan by Americans on all fronts.This is the worst result of double gaming and "might is right" approach of USA.
@Riaz, School enrollment is not akin to enrollment into madrasas from which pakistan statistics of enrollment would have come higher than India.. If education has been top priority in pakistan and has been from 1990 then the school pass outs should have shown their presence in pakistan's economy which the author cant find and hence lamenting that education was not given priority.
TM: "Had Pakistan invested in education, our youth would be far more literate. Perhaps, the revolution we see elsewhere in the Muslim world might well have been led from here."
Pakistan has already gone through many a springs like "The Arab Spring". The investment in education has fallen recently because of the general lack of vision of the current political leadership.
However, according to Harvard University researchers Barro & Lee, Pakistan has been increasing enrollment of students in schools at a faster rate since 1990 than India. In 1990, there were 66.2% of Pakistanis vs 51.6% of Indians who had no schooling. In 2000, there were 60.2% Pakistanis vs 43% Indians with no schooling. In 2010, Pakistan reduced it to 38% vs India's 32.7%.
http://www.riazhaq.com/2012/05/educational-attainment-in-india.html
And where is this new leadership going to come from? All who are disgruntled in one party go and join the other party and claim to bring about change in 90 days and their policies are no different from the others.
Politics in PAK is street power and street power needs no education or healthcare. If PAK sustains another three elections, then perhaps a good governing consensus can emerge, but too many hurdles are on the way.
Lost opportunities are aplenty in PAK's short history.
General Sahib, The blind spot you have for the military is on display for all to see. Not one word about the Military role other than Zia personally. Generals have ruled the roost directly or indirectly. Hard decisions? Justice Javed Iqbal backs the army's version on the missing persons in Balochistan. Not even a cursory acknowledgement to the civilian governor who was laying the problems at the feet of the FC. Such hard decisions will finish the job for this land of the pure.
Sir if your analysis, about the serious problems being faced by Pakistan and how its p[olitical history has developed over last 65 years, leads you to the conclusion "And the military continues to retain high standards of professionalism despite great odds and overstretch." .. there is nothing I can say.
Pakistan — not everything is lost
May be. But no one is accusing Pakistan, of not trying hard enough.