Our bodies need about two litres of fluids daily, not two litres of water specifically, said Spero Tsindos from La Trobe University, who examined why we consume so much water.
"Thirty years ago you didn't see a plastic water bottle anywhere, now they appear as fashion accessories. As tokens of instant gratification and symbolism, the very bottle itself is seen as cool and hip," Tsindos was quoted as saying in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health.
"Drinking large amounts of water does not alone cause weight loss. A low-calorie diet is also required," he said, according to a university statement.
"Research has also revealed that water in food eaten has a greater benefit in weight reduction than avoiding food altogether. We should be telling people that beverages like tea and coffee contribute to a person's fluid needs and despite their caffeine content, do not lead to dehydration."
"We need to maintain fluid balance and should drink water, but also consider fluid in unprocessed fruits and vegetables and juices," added Tsindos.
COMMENTS (3)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
So it is clear that media wants to spread its pseudo-science ! Thank you Mr Moderator for NOT publishing my comment which was based on real evidence and medical science. Let the ignorance prevail !
I don't know anyone who thinks drinking water alone can cause weight loss. Of course a low calorie diet (and ideally) some exercise is required. The article is too condensed to be published in a newspaper.
A very condensed article.
I drink about 6-8 glasses of water solely, besides 2 cups of green tea and milkshakes + coffee. I was looking for solid reasons as to why drinking too much water is strong textnot beneficial. Also, I was wondering what exactly do you mean by "too much" or "too little" intake of fluids.
Considering the fact that it's peak summers here in this part of the world, 2 litres of liquid intake per day sounds less to me. I believe i this article was backed by scientific reasons, it would have sounded much more plausible.