US officials confirmed on Tuesday that Libyan-born al Qaeda operative Abu Yahya al-Libi had been killed by a drone strike in Pakistan, in what was described as a 'major blow' to the militant group.
The attack is likely to fuel an increasingly fierce debate about the legality and morality of the drones, which have become one of the chief US weapons against al Qaeda but which opponents say stretch the definition of the legitimate use of lethal force.
"The United States talks human rights and freedoms for all, but the method they used to kill him is savage," Abu Bakr al-Qayed, brother of al-Libi, told Reuters on Wednesday in a telephone interview.
"The way the Americans killed him is heinous and inhumane," he said, speaking from the town of Wadi Otba, south of the Libyan capital. "We are in the 21st century and they claim to be civilised and this is how they take out people."
"Regardless of my brother's ideology, or beliefs, he was a human being and at the end of the day deserves humane treatment," he said.
For years considered a covert Central Intelligence Agency programme, the unmanned aircraft can be remotely piloted from thousands of kilometres (miles) away and can fire missiles at targets seen only on a monitor at the push of a button.
White House officials say there is nothing in international law that forbids the use of the drones and that, by killing dangerous insurgents, they are making Americans safer.
US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta said on Wednesday that they will keep up their attacks in Pakistan.
That view has been challenged by authorities in Pakistan, who are angry because many of the strikes have happened on their soil, and by rights campaigners.
Civil liberties groups argue that the strikes are illegal because they take place outside an active battlefield, meaning the rules of law which allow a combatant to kill their opponent do not apply.
Radicalisation
The United States and security analysts say al-Libi was a veteran militant and leader of operations for al Qaeda, a group responsible for the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on US cities as well as dozens of other acts of violence.
His brother offered a more nuanced account, describing how al-Libi had gone from being a chemistry student in Libya to hiding out in the mountains of Pakistan's North Waziristan region.
He said his brother, also known as Mohammed Hassan al-Qayed, had been radicalised by his treatment under Muammar Gaddafi, the Libyan leader killed in an uprising last year. Gaddafi's security forces routinely arrested anyone who strayed from officially approved Islam.
"We come from a great line of students of religion, we are a religious family and we all studied Islamist jurisprudence at school. I am an Islamic studies professor," al-Qayed, 57, told Reuters.
"He was a very bright student and always had high marks and he wanted more out of his studies, so was forced to leave Libya... The last time we saw him was in 1990 when he left to study abroad because he was oppressed in Libya due to his beliefs."
"The last time we spoke to him was in 2002, and since then we only know what's happening with him through the media," the brother said.
"I never heard him speak of killing innocent people and don't believe he would ever condone it. He was a Muslim, and we don't kill people without reason."
"My brother was attracted to his ideology because he was oppressed and we were all oppressed and saw great suffering from Gaddafi's regime."
In what one analyst said was in retaliation to al-Libi's killing, a bomb exploded outside the offices of the US diplomatic mission in Libya's eastern city of Benghazi early on Wednesday. There was only slight damage.
Al-Qayed said he knew nothing about the attack in Benghazi.
Asked if he expected any reaction inside Libya to his brother's killing, he said only: "I don't know, but the Muslim is the brother of the Muslim."
He appealed to Pakistan's government and humanitarian agencies to find his brother's body and bring it back to Libya "so we may bury him here as a martyr."
COMMENTS (15)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@kaalchakra
Wouldn’t it have been far more honorable of Obama, if he had the courage, to invite the man over for a duel to the finish?
Please stop living in the 16th century
He is absolutely right.Killing scores of innocent people including women and children,employing suicide bombers is Humane.Dictating and enforcing violently our way religious beliefs is Humane.My Way or Highway is Humane.Let us petition Webster to change the meaning of Humane in their dictionary.
It goes to show that Pakistan has no writ in these parts where foreigners are living illegally and attacking neighboring countries. Even china has complained of insurgency emanating from northern areas of Pakistan. The world, under the circumstances, is free to target such elements in areas which actually are not part of Pakistan.
Look who is talking. Double standards galore! Americans are no angels, but ...
This is very sad. Wouldn't it have been far more honorable of Obama, if he had the courage, to invite the man over for a duel to the finish?
This scenario is what is commonly described as "devil quoting the scriptures".
In this world, where the law of jungle prevailes, might is always right. The days for America are numbered. How can we forget the millions killed by USA in japan by using weapons of mass destruction. Furthermore killing millions in Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan does not satisfy them. The world would see the demise of USA in just few years Inshallah.
Tired of these shameful extremist hypocrites and their insincere deluded lies. Why was his brother in Pak illegally. Why didn't he turn himself in? Waiting for a royal invitation since 2002? Was he hoping to be 'humanely' shot dead by the Afghan or Pakistani armies instead? If he was oppressed by Gaddafi, what was he doing in Pak with Al Qaeda?!
Thousands of innocent civilians, especially MUSLIM civilians, were bloodily massacred by Al Qaeda, and this is all documented and self-confessed by them, so you'd be an incredible liar or deranged terrorist sympathizer to argue otherwise. Did his brother ever speak out against it or just ranted about how much he hated America with guns and bombs?! Did he cut contact from 2002 because he joined a charitable monastery? No. He joined Al Qaeda, whose own sympathizers know its a militant organization specializing in explosions among civilians. This was no honourable Muslim, nor a brother to other Muslims, but rather a criminal murdering terrorist.
Any person can shoot the other guy in self defence, as per laws in most democratic countries.
By that extension, US had killed this man in self-defence. The person in question was violent, had aligned himself to an ideology known to have hurt the US and its citizens in large number and which will continue to seek harm to the US, that is unquestionably true and undisputed.
So, US can say it shot him in self defence.
Besides, even Pakistanis do not control that area and no law is existent realistically speaking in the tribal areas. I can't see what law the US is breaking.
You live by the sword you die by the sword. He got what he deserved.
All those terrorist strikes and suicide bombing by the AQ monsters are VERY VERY HUMAN, is it not, You dont kill animals after judicial processes. If u spot a violent snake, you kill it whichever way you can. Dont shed crocodile tears for doing so. Congrats USA for eliminating one more ANACONDA,
For once I think I can say something and make it sound like I'm speaking for more than myself without too many reservations... To the brother: Kiss our collective... butts
Yes, religious family, my foot. What about your brother's killing hundred and thousands humans all over the world. Its a shame that we belong to the same religion. InshAllah we got Osama, we got Libi and will get all the fitna makers in every form and idelogy
What this person was doing was more inhumane. Training people to kill Americans is a great reason to go after them with all due diligence. Keep shooting em U. S. Military
He probably orchestrates be-headings on the weekends and yet he is compelled to state "drone attacks are inhumane". He doesn't know what inhumane means.