Bin Laden was fiercely against charity work “at the expense of jihad”: Zawahiri

"The rich sheikh Osama... has spent all his money on jihad," said Zawahiri.


Afp June 03, 2012
Bin Laden was fiercely against charity work “at the expense of jihad”: Zawahiri

DUBAI: The late founder of al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden's personal life was "austere" and he was "very stingy in spending on anything other than jihad," Zawahiri said, stressing that the Saudi-born leader was fiercely against charity work "at the expense of jihad."

Bin laden spent his fortune on financing "holy war" including the September 11 US attacks in 2001, said current al Qaeda chief Ayman al Zawahiri in an Internet video.

"The rich sheikh Osama... has spent all his money on jihad," said Zawahiri, Bin Laden's number two who took charge of the jihadist group after the world's most wanted man was killed in a US raid on a Pakistan hideout in May last year.

Zawahiri's message, posted on few websites, was introduced as the second part of his memoirs on the life of Bin Laden.

"He spent generously on jihad, especially on financing the September 11 attacks in 2001" on the United States and the "attacks against the US embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam" in 1998, Zawahiri said.

The wealth of Bin Laden, who came from a rich family behind grandiose construction projects in the oil-rich kingdom, is estimated at between $30 million and $300 million, but some estimates put it at one billion dollars.

COMMENTS (24)

Freedom Seeker | 12 years ago | Reply

OBL was against charity work as may be some life will be saved from that. He was in death business who prefer to finance Jihad( death) not charity. CIA was providing him this finance in mountains of Afghanistan. CIA finance only destruction, chaos, anarchy and death.

Rizo | 12 years ago | Reply

9/11 was an inside job http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ