The US-led International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan said Saudi-born Sakhr al-Taifi, also known as Musthaq and Nasim, commanded foreign fighters and directed attacks on NATO and Afghan troops.
It described him as al Qaeda's "second highest leader in Afghanistan", saying he frequently travelled between Afghanistan and Pakistan, "carrying out commands from senior al Qaeda leadership".
He also supplied weapons and equipment to insurgents, and managed the transport of insurgent fighters into Afghanistan, the military said.
NATO said he was killed in an air strike on Sunday with "one additional al Qaeda terrorist in Watahpur district, Kunar province" which borders Pakistan.
The United States announced last year that it would focus military operations in Afghanistan towards the eastern provinces, which border Pakistan's lawless tribal belt where US officials say Taliban and al Qaeda-linked militants have sanctuary.
NATO forces are in Afghanistan helping the Western-backed government fight a bloody, Taliban-led insurgency following the US-led invasion shortly after the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States.
There are around 130,000 international troops in Afghanistan and all NATO-led combat forces are due to leave by the end of 2014.
COMMENTS (10)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Kashi: "its difficult for Nato to kill these ppl in Afghanistan area while they traveling from Afghanistan to Pakistan??? and easy to kill in Pakistan why, why drones cannt kill them inside Afghanistan border area ??? "
NATO DOES have boots on ground in Afghanistan. So it will not use drones to kill someone in Afghanistan. In Pakistan however it does nto have boots on ground and hence uses drones...
It is indispensable,admit defeat and leave the country handing over it to the original heirs.
Solution on the table is a best way,leading to the peace and prosperity, there are more destruction a head if present continuity will remained intact.
@Salman Sheikh: "How many 2nd in commands are there???" There is always a 2nd-in-command! The position gets filled as soon as one is droned!
Table is the last solution, otherwise many eleven years ahead, Jihad will remained continued.
its difficult for Nato to kill these ppl in Afghanistan area while they traveling from Afghanistan to Pakistan??? and easy to kill in Pakistan why, why drones cannt kill them inside Afghanistan border area ??? Reason is Nato want to use the name of Pakistan every time.
Why is it always near Pakistan's border? Isn't Pakistan's border also Afghanistan's border as well?
@Salman Sheikh, well said !! This must be 2000th 2nd in command.
How many 2nd in commands are there???
Hats off Uncle sam! Bulls eye again! Allah sure looks the other way when Drones come