Speaking informally to a few journalists on board the prime minister’s aircraft back to Islamabad from the UK, Foreign Minister Khar delivered some interesting sound bites on Pakistan’s relations with the US and Nato. However, the important queries went without concrete answers.
Given that it was coming at the end of a five-day state visit to London, the foreign minister was particularly keen on highlighting the healthy state of ties with the UK – drawing a parallel with the current Pakistan-US relations.
The UK and the US have the same objectives in Afghanistan, she mused, yet only the latter that seems to have issues with Pakistan, while the former has no such problems. She has a point. After all, a joint statement issued after a meeting between British and Pakistani prime ministers did quote David Cameron as saying that Pakistan’s enemy is an enemy of the UK, and vice versa.
That’s a pretty strong statement by most standards – particularly in the context of a supposed ‘troublemaker state’.
Foreign Minister Khar was also keen on stressing that she personally believed that Nato supply routes through Pakistan, closed for some six months now, should be reopened.
On one hand, she says that it is in Pakistan’s interest to facilitate an international operation, while on the other she says that there are many friendly countries whose supplies are also blocked.
Nato and Isaf supplies, she said, should not be seen in the context of relations with the US. After all, added the foreign minister, Nato and Isaf are umbrella organisations for over 40 countries, including close friends such as Turkey, the UK, et al.
She had some interesting things to say about Pakistan’s role and its perceived importance globally. The young foreign minister insisted that the school of thought that said Pakistan should do whatever it takes to remain “relevant” internationally was flawed. “I’d rather be irrelevant than negatively relevant,” she said.
She hastened to add that the decision to close the supply routes was the correct one, recalling not only the Salala strikes, but also the US’ Abbottabad incursion – which she termed an effort to take sole credit for finding Osama bin Laden.
Regarding Pakistan’s supposed obligation to keep supply routes open, given that Afghanistan is an UN-mandated mission, she said that Pakistan was not “bound” as the UN resolution only called for “facilitation.” She also rubbished the chances of sanctions being slapped on Pakistan because of the blockade.
However, the foreign minister was not forthcoming on when exactly the supply routes would be reopened – and was hesitant to even give a timeframe.
When questioned on what the stumbling block was, the foreign minister said simply that negotiations are under way and that “goodwill” was needed. She negated reports that the US had now declined to apologise to Pakistan. Why the routes had not been reopened was a question that remained unanswered, despite several attempts to get a concrete answer, with the foreign minister saying, surprisingly, that she was not privy to silent backroom discussions on the matter reportedly under way in Islamabad.
Inevitably, this segued into a question regarding the Army’s role in foreign policy. The foreign minister had a unique – and obviously painfully prepared – answer for this: saying that the role of the army should not be overplayed, or, for that matter, undercut.
Interestingly, at no point did the foreign minister attempt to dispel notions put forward by journalists that Pak-US relations are at an extreme low.
On the latest controversy in Pakistan-US ties – whether or not Pakistan would be invited to the Chicago conference on Afghanistan – Khar’s reply was surprisingly straightforward. On being asked who would be representing Pakistan at the conference, she said Pakistan had to actually first be invited before deciding on who would attend.
The comment is somewhat surprising, given that just two days ago she whispered into the prime minister’s ear at a press conference that Nato had retracted a statement by its Secretary General which suggested that Pakistan will not be invited to the conference.
On the other hand, the foreign minister said that Pakistan has taken the high road recently on a number of issues and has acted responsibly, regardless of what may be said about it. She quoted the example of the aftermath of the assassination of former Afghanistan president Burhanuddin Rabbani. There were a lot of negative things said about Pakistan at that time, she said. It would have been easy to react, but Pakistan didn’t – and instead handled the matter diplomatically.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 14th, 2012.
COMMENTS (41)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Anonymous: "There is a way out of this. Pakistan can allow other NATO countries to use routes minus the US."
IT is NATO that bombed Salala not US. SO either you block NATO supplies or not.
Ms Khar you must support to open NATO supply route. Do not lesson to brain drain Mullahs. These mullahs have hidden agenda, They should not run the counties foreign polices. burden is on your shoulder. What Pakistan will get for closing the route? NATO will still attack Taliban and insurgents in Afghanistan. All senseable Pakistanis are behind you. Keep up the good work
beyond bravado and stories by mullahs...there is sanity and reality
I fail to understand your intentions behind the phrase " the young foreign minister ". Its not the age, but the answers she gave - which are more than mature and really sound diplomatic.
There is a way out of this. Pakistan can allow other NATO countries to use routes minus the US.
Pakistan can state that it is willing to negotiate terms on bilateral basis with any country who wants to use these routes. Infact it would add pressure at US as most of the NATO countries want to get out of this mess because of economic problems in EU.
The message would be loud and clear that we have no problem with NATO, if US wants to use our routes then it must appologise.
70% of Pakistan's populations is under 30 years old. If we want a future and our country to be competent internationally, respected and if we want a country that will make us proud, we HAVE to vote for Imran Khan, if PMLN or PPP continue ruling this country, we will become far worse than Afghanistan within the next 5 years. And I hate to say this, but Pakistan might not even stay the same country it is today if Nawaz/Zardari continue their games, lets vote for PTI before these people make us refugees in our own country.
No apology for Salala and no let up on drone attacks. Should we assume that the US intimidation, coercion and black mail has finally done the trick.
Pakistan has to reopen the route. Come out of your fantasy world and stop living in denial, Pakistanis. We as a country, have lost all respect, credibility. Ever heard beggars can't be choosers? the same applies here. Too much of ghairat, not much substance in us as a country.We live on money donated to us by the US, this is our life-line, accept it (or not) in your fantasy world where ghairat is the only thing.
And I endorse her!
NATO supply opens or not, this will not change the fate of pakistan( the dying state)
Well said Madam, it is demand of your job.
@Atiya: So is anyone or anything in Pakistan "Yours" ! After all, your people gave elected them and gave mandate to rule !!!!
She has learned to be a " Pakistani Politician" with so many contridictions in everything she said !!!!! The interview is full of farce, and confusions !!! Nothing concrete, for someone representing a Nation in capacity of FM !!!!
If you wanted to open the line without any apology or anything substantial, then what was the point of holding it for so long?
Khar lives in REALITY - however most Pakistanis live in self denial. We are the laughing stock of the world NOT an economic superpower and losers cannot be choosers!
Foreign Ministry is all about diplomatic skills and Hina is not at all bad at this...
Atiya : The Greenbacks are also not yours, But Americas. Pl think for a minute about the disasters Pak people have to undergo under US/NATO sanctions.
The only thing that matters is if Pakistan will assist the US with it's troop pullout or not. That is the real card that Pakistan still holds.
NATO supply will open eventually; it's just the matter of "when".
how government can open the supply route unless whole parliament agrees to open it?
At one side, government say, they are answerable to people of pakistan whever supreme court pass a judgement against them and now when people of pakistan blocked the nato supply route, they are goind to kick peoples judgement too?
This step should have been taken much earlier but now taken under lot of pressures from US.
Imran Khan needs to get in power as he is just and has ethics that will bring this to an end. This government is not ours, but Americas. This foreign minister, is not ours, but Americas, this PM is not ours but Americas, this President is not ours, but Americas, and this Army is not ours but Americas. Wake up.
Please SC- disqualify them- they make us sick
Your a disgrace to the whole nation. Resign with whatever dignity you have left!
this government is done and finished
Its all towards the end right before Gilani and the cabinet are ousted by the SC.
SC zindabad !!
DPC has said they will block it at all costs.
This is government may be ousted by SC within a few days. Read on Gilani barking about being 'defiant'
Dont get to giddy now, wont do your heart any good.
@truth will free you: You are correct - but while it is easy to get your unofficial representatives to effect a quiet climbdown, it is far more difficult to reverse public opinion on this emotive issue that has been played for its money's worth. During elections, the PPP will have to shoulder the blame with everyone in the opposition blaming the govt for acting in an anti-democratic manner by deliberately ignoring a unainimous parliamentary resolution.
She is intelligent. I like her
Makes sense!
But why did it take over 5 months to realise this.
She is getting clever by the day. But, even she couldn't mask the fact that US has refused to apologize to Pakistan and Pakistan is desperate to undo the damage it did after taking a hardline stand against the US.
The notion "US needs Pakistan, more than Pakistan needs the US" is well and truly disproved. I won't be surprised if Pakistan apologizes to NATO now, even indirectly.
Some sweet words from the erstwhile colonial masters and voila! Nato is playing the classic good cop bad cop game.
Pak has no option but to open d route for nato but wants face saving formula.
Shameful.
Yeah this Govt is in Grave need of funds to pay for the energy otherwise it is game over for them. Thats why they are dyeing to open NATO supply so that they may get the funds as reward even if USA is not going to apologise. YOU CANT BE BRAVE IF YOU ARE DISHONEST.
The nation is against the reopening of supplies
The Pakistani people reject this
Its the same UK Govt.that accused Pakistan of 'Looking both ways' during a state visit to India - so how cute of our leaders that a nice slogan is all the need from their UK visit to claim it a success. What about trade, investment, and other important deals ? UK foreign policy revolves around US, and if US sees us a problem then so does UK.
You should have asked UK to condemn drone strike...and ask them to put pressure on US to apologize for the Salla attacks! I am sure you all must have tried that hard. So in a nut shell kindly come back home dont waste our national wealth on useless trip, very much to pacify and plan for future PPP survival. Enough is enough, Pakistan is sick of this government and you cant change this any more.
Pakistan Zindabad
Khar living in donkey's land. It is important to do counter perceptions and allegations with any available means. Those allegations and rhetoric will not cease if not countered. Fling and see what sticks, it's what everyone else does. The issue can be "diplomatically" resolved either way.
Agree with Pakistani state policy. . We were right to block to show our anger. . Now its time to move on! We have to live in real world.
Pakistan as a country has no dignity and respect. Watch CNN calling Gilani and Pakistan as liars.
Off course, greens are actually healthy - especially in the form of american dollars.
Since PPP government is too incompetent and corrupt to undertake serious political, economic reforms and help Pakistan stand on its own feet, Pakistan does not have any choice. So, we may have to take this bitter pill and move on. Lets get PTI elected and undertake serious economic/political reforms and strengthen ourselves to the extent that world respects and listens to us and takes us seriously. That is the only option and choice we have . NOTHING else. So, vote follow Imran Khan, vote PTI.
Haha! - a pity that avoiding answering tough questions is seen a positive skill! True for all politicians and diplomats - but a pity nontheless!
Also doesn't she know that UK and US are joined at the hip? They often play good-cop / bad-cop routine with countries to get what they want!!