“The petition is premature, wait for the detailed verdict,” observed the court.
Responding to the petition which had maintained that according to Article 63 (1) (g) of the Constitution, the prime minister stands disqualified from being a member of the National Assembly, Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui remarked, “Article 63 (1) (g) does not mention the prime minister’s disqualification.”
“By the time the detailed verdict is out, a petition might not even be necessary,” he said.
Earlier, the petition filed in the IHC sought the court to order Gilani to stop serving as the prime minister after his conviction in a contempt case against him.
It states that Gilani had defied the Supreme Court’s orders by not writing a letter to the Swiss authorities, asking them to reopen graft cases against President Asif Ali Zardari and thus he should be disqualified.
COMMENTS (4)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Zaleem Singh: Unfortunately you lack common sense.
Law should not be equal for all:Prime Minister should be a Prime Minister.And Kyani should be resign from his post ASAP.Kyani is a dangerous man.
The nation should not be kept waiting for the detailed verdict for too long.
Go Gilani Go. Gilani has not legal and moral right to rule the country. Shame for such power-hungry politicians.