The chief justice of Pakistan has said that not conducting local bodies (LB) election is a violation of the Constitution, and problems will crop up for the government, if the court is petitioned against this.
Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry said the court’s job is to identify the problem – and it is for the government to address it. However, he added that the court orders are continuously ignored. Justice Chaudhry was heading a three-judge bench which was hearing a case regarding LB elections at Quetta Registry on Monday.
He said that whenever the third force came to power, the first thing they did was to hold LB elections. The late Gen Ziaul Haq and former military ruler Gen Pervez Musharraf conducted LB elections, but it was not understandable why a democratic government was reluctant.
Powers to hold LB election have been devolved to the provinces under the 18th Constitutional Amendment, but they have not fulfilled their constitutional obligation, Justice Chaudhry further remarked.
He said the court appreciated Parliament after the 18th Amendment, but Parliament was not happy with the judiciary. However, the bench was informed that Parliament was not unhappy with the court.
He said that if LB elections were not held, the bench will pronounce its judgment on the next hearing.
Punjab’s Advocate General Ashtar Ausaf apprised the bench of difficulties his province was facing in holding LB elections. “You had to conduct the polls earlier,” shot back Justice Chaudhry.
Sindh’s Advocate General Attah Malik informed the bench that the provincial administration would conduct the polls by October 2012.
Balochistan’s Advocate General Amanullah Kanrani said that his province was ready to conduct LB elections. However, it wanted to hold them along with the other provinces.
But Justice Chaudhry said the Balochistan government should hold the elections at the earliest in light of the problems it was facing. “This will help the province restore peace in the region.”
The bench also issued a notice to the chief election commissioner to present in the court new voters’ lists at the next hearing.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 1st, 2012.
COMMENTS (5)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
CJ Sahib..........Sir,have you found only one violation of constitution? Kindly delve into the history of past four & a half years,you will find it replete with nothing,but,violations,violations & violations of our dear constitution,by this government!! O'God help us !!!
Someone tells this guy that not appointing judges to High Courts and the Supreme Court is also a violation of Constitution!
A staggering 50% of SHC is closed because Mr PCO judge cannot find suitable candidates 30% of LHC is vacant and a further vacancy is present in Supreme Court because no candidate belonging from the preferred ethnic background is at a senior position at any of the high courts.
Moreover, the presence of minorities both ethnic and religious including shias, sindhis and balochis are at a historic low particularly their own provinces of Sindh and Balochistan.
People would appreciate if the Chief Justice tells the same thing to Punjab government,because that province make more than 50% of the total population. He can suspend the Punjab CM on charges of contempt.
Justice should be equal for all……..
Aiding and abetting the abrogation and mutilation of constitution repeatedly is not the violation of constitution? When would anybody ever be tried for high treason for breaking the constitution?