Food Prints is more than a book of recipes. It is, in fact, an authentic and veritable compendium of Pakistan’s cuisine, culled from eating in a number of Pakistani homes. Profusely illustrated, it is spread over a very wide spectrum and there is evidence of considerable, laborious and painstaking research in collecting such an astonishing variety of dishes and cooking techniques. There is also a well-informed smartness about the selection from a very wide swathe, which covers all the four provinces where the author had the opportunity to interact with leading chefs. She gives great background information, which helps the reader understand the reasons for some of the rich diversity of styles. Ramzi has travelled all over Pakistan and her love for Pakistani food is reflected in her book, which is a testament to simple ingredients producing sublime tastes.
To kick-start the presentation, there was an attractive Master of Ceremonies (MC) in the person of Chef Shahi who appeared to have been imported for the event. In 10 minutes flat, she gave the audience her life story. In between fighting for an expression, extempore hair tossing and casual strolling and posing, one gleaned that there wasn’t a five-star restaurant in Manhattan where she hadn’t tossed a Waldorf salad or fried a kebab. At times, when introducing the stream of speakers, she overdid it a bit. But her obsession never wavered, the solipsism was utter, hermetic, the concentration and self-absorption resolute, utterly engrossed. Regrettably … there were too many people who hogged the limelight.
The thing that I have always dreaded about book launches in Pakistan is the number of speeches inflicted on an audience. In my opinion, there ought to be only two speakers — the MC who introduces the author — and the man or woman who is about to grasp his or her moment of glory. The speech should not be more than 20 minutes. Ramzi did it in 10 and was quite delightful. People have a low boredom threshold and probably come for the cucumber sandwiches and fish fingers anyway. And if the MC says that the chief guest is well known and does not need any introduction, he or she should not blooming well spend the next 20 minutes introducing the author. But, regrettably, at most of the presentations that I have attended in Karachi, which have predictably started late because of the chief guest arriving 90 minutes late, there have been between six and 10 speakers.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 29th, 2012.
COMMENTS (5)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Khan jr, thank u for clearfication sir ....
So true.
Mr. Mooraj , I could only substantiate you that there should not be more than two speakers. More speaker and when the ceremony already started late,is only test of forbearance of the audience.That could be avoided easily if the organizers have a little care of the audience time.
Ali Tanoli your knowledge is as usual quite underwhelming. The Oxford University Press (OUP) owes its name; not any passion for Urdish or using as you put it the 'queen name'; but to the fact that it is a university press owned and governed by University of Oxford (UK) for the past few hundred years. The OUP has subsidiaries throughout the world, including Pakistan.
why Oxford ??? is there no name left or may be we feel proud talking in Urdish and using queen names....