Witness to remarkable triumphs and humiliating reverses, the Turks have developed tremendous resilience and unflinching self-belief. After defeat and dismemberment in wake of the First World War, modern Turkey’s founders — its armed forces — decided to break with the past and impose secularism and modernity by force. When civilian leaders were suspected of veering away from the Kemalist ideology, the army did not hesitate to send them packing, sometimes in a rather brutal fashion. This makes the transformation in the country’s domestic and foreign policies –– engineered by the ruling Justice and Development Party under Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan –– all the more remarkable.
While the government’s economic policies have brought widespread prosperity to the people and growing approbation from the populace, it has also rekindled powerful nationalist sentiments. This could be discerned in cafes and bazaars and during my bus ride to Ankara. It is this new development — an increasingly assertive posture in diplomacy, my primary area of interest –– that raises many questions. The Turks that I spoke to reiterated that the government remains committed to a policy of ‘zero problems with neighbours’, a concept credited to Foreign Minister Ahmet Devatoglu. This eminently sensible approach brought kudos to Prime Minister Erdogan and burnished his credentials as a bold reformer at home and also an advocate of peace and stability in the region. However, in more recent times, Turkish diplomacy appears to have become more forceful and occasionally rigid, with initiatives that could be a cause of concern to neighbours in the not-too-distant future.
The resident diplomats I spoke to explained that Erdogan and his colleagues are motivated by a strong conviction that it is Turkey’s destiny to be a great power. And while the Ottoman Empire cannot be resurrected, the country’s strong economy reinforced by skillful diplomacy could make Turkey the region’s most influential country. Others confided that many people in positions of power today are deeply attached to the teachings of Fathulla Gulen, a holy man residing in Pennsylvania, United States. A Muslim scholar and charismatic preacher, Gulen has millions of followers in Turkey and in other countries. Gulen has long opposed militancy, instead advocating tolerance and interfaith dialogue while drawing on the traditions of Sufism. His critics, however, accuse him of leading a surreptitious movement to take Turkey away from its secular foundations and turn it into an Islamist state with transborder ambitions.
I happened to arrive in Istanbul on the very day that clashes took place on the Turkish-Syrian border, which appeared to symbolise Turkey’s forceful assertion of its desire to influence events in the neighbourhood. Turkish leaders reiterated their resolve to take ‘unspecified action’ against President Bashar alAssad, once a friend and ally, while also hosting thousands of Syrian refugees — who are being armed and trained to infiltrate Syria and cause havoc — on its soil. A year ago, Turkey was bitterly opposed to Nato’s intervention in Libya while promoting reconciliation in Lebanon and Iraq, forcefully advocating the Palestinian cause and seeking to mediate between Iran and the West. Today, it is being viewed with growing apprehension by its neighbours.
Turkey’s aggressive posture on Syria and active involvement in engineering a regime change in a neighbouring country –– and that, too, by armed intervention –– may bring in the West’s appreciation but carries huge risks, even for a strong country like Turkey –– with its own restive Kurdish minority. Human rights can become a double-edged sword.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 25th, 2012.
COMMENTS (21)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Raja Ahmed:
Fair point indeed good sir. I should not have made an ad hominem attack (something I abhor other people doing). I also didn't know the backdrop of the ambassador's removal so thank you for enlightening the readers. I would like to apologize to the Ambassador and readership and retract my comments.
However, my original point of the piece being more than a little un-nuanced stands. I don't blame the author, but I do blame ET. They give voices to people on many occasions who lack a sophisticated, deep and nuanced understanding of the issue they are discussing. If the ambassador were to write about Pak foreign policy issues esp. vis a vis the EU given his level of understanding (given his ambassadorship) that would be fantastic. However, one visit to the country cannot make you an expert. Pakistanis need experts - enough of this couch diplomacy and drawing-room analysis.
Why can't the ET get a PhD scholar on the Middle East or a Turkophile of some standing to write a piece on Turkey? The problem is not the Ambassador, but ET!!
@Troy: There is no other nation which has rented out its military air-base to Israel. Turkey does its major purchase of arms from Israel.
This airbase is near Adana and called Incirlik. (A bomber pilot Gary Powers, flew from here to Peshawar then further on a surveillance mission over Soviet Union, where it was downed.)
Erdogan loves to play the drama queen. Did Turkey kick out the Israeli Ambassador?
Turkey !!!! The present government in turkey reminds me of a mild form of Hitler in 2012. let's see, how long the precious secularism survives there now. Peace. Take care
@Ashar:
"If Gulen is behind the present state of affairs in turkey, i wish we could have a man like him in Pakistan."
It may be beneficial, if you bother to read about NURCULAR of Turkey. What forced him to leave Turkey and migrate to USA? Who was he working for while in Azerbaijan? Who funds him and his links with Erdogan's party?
You can read a bit on Soros too, who also contributes to the welfare of the people around the globe.
May be then only can you pray.
Why this infatuation with Turkey and where it is going politically? It is so far removed from Pakistan and not much in common with Pakistan except religion. The articles sound like we seek direction from whats happening in Turkey. Lets talk on what we can do to improve our standing in the comity of nations.
-Hari
@Chandio: Completely agree on that one. We should raise voice against oppressive regimes or governance practices wherever they are be it Syria or Bahrain or KSA or Pakistan or India. Our commitment should be first and foremost to humanity and least to anyone's political vendetta.
Well written article except the last two paragraphs. Syria is in chaos and the only person responsible is Asad. Even though turkey had a zero problem policy with neighbours she had no choice but to ask Asad to step down. It is not possible for turkey to remain closed lips when thousands of syrians are crossing over to turkey. Fatimi has a soft corner for Asad it seems.
I agree with you, Sir, that risks abound but the government so far has acted with great deftness.
If Gulen is behind the present state of affairs in turkey, i wish we could have a man like him in Pakistan.
"Ref. Mr. Jalib's snide comment, whihc is neither true nor in good taste. I am always surprised and disappointed to see people abandon objectivity and engage in persoanl attacks. Incidentally, the writer was transferred by Gen Musharraf after the latter had seized power and wanted a personal confidant to represent him in Washington. This has always been the case in choosing Ambassadors to the US. Thereafter, the writer was sent to Jordan-- a less important assignment admittedly-- but Musharraf soon recognised his outstanding abilities when he had him sent to head our mission to the European Union---an extemely important assignment and tasked him with ensuring the European Parliament's ratification of the Third Generation Agreement, a critcal agreement needed to move relations with the EU to a higher plain. This mission was carried out by him most successfully. "
@Falcon: While it is becoming obvious on every successive day of a high level of interest in the regime change in Syria by non-Syrians. But can I ask you why are we silent on oppressive regime in Bahrain militarily supported by Saudi Arabia and Pakistan - hypocritical isn't?
@ashok, you probably cannot digest anything without cursing Pakistan. Get a life dude.
Accusing Gulen with turning Turkey into an Islamist state is a baseless one which was repeated over years and cannot be supported by any academic work whatsoever. Gulen's stance on political issues are clear in his writings, books about him, and interviews.
Here is a website that provides answers to such questions: http://hizmetesorulanlar.org/questions.html
There are also two recent scholarly books on Gulen:
http://www.amazon.com/The-G%C3%BClen-Movement-Sociological-Analysis/dp/1402098936/ref=sr12?ie=UTF8&qid=1335315973&sr=8-2
http://www.amazon.com/Wrestling-Speech-Religious-Freedom-Democracy/dp/0761854614/ref=sr11?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1335315995&sr=1-1
There is no other nation who has stood up to Israel, is there?
I see that Indians trolls are promptly reporting for duty - the discussion will go down the drain.
knowing this closely I argue that I don't agree with his statement: "His critics, however, accuse him of leading a surreptitious movement to take Turkey away from its secular foundations and turn it into an Islamist state with transborder ambitions." please check out this web site to learn more about Mr. Gulen's philosophy and educational, interfaith and other activities and services he promoted: Click here to visit the web page.
Thanks,One of the most unsophisticated pieces I have ever read in a newspaper. Small wonder then that the ambassador was removed from his Ambassadorial position in the US after a couple of months!
I think the author is making a wrong assumption somewhere that Turkey is interested in dismantling Syrian govt in order to appease western powers. Turkey's new identity is apparently less bothered about what its European and American friends think. It has more to do with their belief in Syrian struggle and may be for competing political influence vis-a-vis Iran in the region. On that note, I think it is hypocritical of us Muslims to stay silent over the oppression of Syrian Govt. If something similar had been done by Israel, the whole Islamic world will be burning in rage, but since a Muslim country is involved in bloodshed, we are silent. For that reason alone, Turkey might be correct. At the least, they are standing up for what is right!
Turkey's army has long been a custodian of its domestic and foreign policy - and therein lies its weakness; democratic debate is still weak in Turkey. Democracy is a powerful force and in the wrong hands, produces demagogues of Erdogan's ilk - who subtly subvert the hard-won secular character and 'Turkishness' of the Turkish people to replace it with a fairy tale called Islamic brotherhood - a disease that has taken its toll on Pakistan already. What is happening in Turkey is not different from the right-wing polarisation that began in Bhutto's time - another demagogue of note. (Zia just hastened the process and brought it to its logical conclusion). However, Turkey is heavily dependent on trade with Europe, and cannot afford to flex its muscles in this manner for too long - it has no oil reserves. Reality, when it strikes, will be harsh, but by then the damage could well be irreversible.
No matter what, Turkey will not follow the suicidal path adopted by Pakistan establishment after becoming an aitmee taakat..
Turkey is dreaming of Ottomon Empire again.