UN unanimously approves Syria observer force

UN Resolution 2042 approved the first 30 unarmed military monitors, who are expected to to leave within days.


Afp April 14, 2012

UNITED NATIONS: The UN Security Council on Saturday unanimously voted its first ever resolution on the Syria crisis, allowing an advance party of ceasefire monitors to go to the country on the brink of civil war.

UN Resolution 2042 approved the first 30 unarmed military monitors, who are expected to to leave within days.

The resolution also calls upon the Syrian government to "implement visibly" all commitments under special envoy Kofi Annan's peace plan -- including the withdrawal of all troops and heavy guns from Syrian cities.

The vote had been expected Friday but was held up by Russian objections to much of the text. Russia's ambassador Vitaly Churkin said that "substantive changes had been made to make it more balanced."

Russia and China vetoed the last two attempts by the council to pass a resolution on the crisis which the UN says has left well over 9,000 dead.

A new resolution with a full mandate will be required for the full monitoring mission of more than 200 observers.

COMMENTS (2)

Pindiwal | 12 years ago | Reply

What matters isnt what Assad wants. For West, it has always been, "what NATO wants". A repeat of Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan. They first tried the same course of actions which ensured their presence in Libya. Veto from China and Russia frustrated this attempt. Thanks Russia and China.

j. von hettlingen | 12 years ago | Reply

This resolution approved only the deployment of observers to Syria to monitor the ceasefire. It's uncertain what will happen next. No doubt Assad sees the resolution as a diplomatic defeat as his staunch ally Russia didn't veto it. He will have to observe the truce and withdraw his tanks and troops. No doubt he knows what the opposition wants next: his stepping down.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ