Notice taken?: Chief justice seeks record of Zardari, Bilawal speeches

Note had alerted court of the anti-judiciary speeches made on ZA Bhutto death anniversary.


Our Correspondent April 11, 2012

ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry has directed the relevant section of the Supreme Court to furnish before him records of speeches made last week by President Asif Ali Zardari and Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) co-chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari at on the occasion of Zulifiqar Ali Bhutto.

The hard-hitting speeches in question openly caste doubts and criticised the judiciary in general and the Supreme Court in particular – particularly the one by the PPP’s young co-chairman during a meeting of the party’s Central Executive Committee in Naudero.

Sources said a note was submitted to the Chief Justice based on press clipping regarding the speeches, on which Justice Chaudhry directed the concerned section in the apex court to furnish a complete record before him.

Sources in the Supreme Court, however, said that it was a routine matter as the Chief Justice usually seeks more information about important issues when a file is put before him. However, on many occasions, such records serve as catalysts for suo-moto notice on important issues.

Two PPP leaders – the prime minister himself as well as Senator Babar Awan – are already facing contempt proceedings.

COMMENTS (30)

Mirza | 12 years ago | Reply

When it comes to the constitutional powers of the executive the court and its rightwing apologists start talking about the equality of all in Islam. Even though the constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan has been unanimously approved and endorsed by each and every govt. They do not stop talking against the constitutional powers like no presidential immunity and powers to pardon. However, when it comes to the non elected paid govt employs they are so sacred that nobody can remind them of their ignominious history. Telling the truth becomes unislamic when it comes to the big egos. Where is the Islamic equality and free speech now? Here is a recent example how the parliament (the supreme body who makes and changes the laws not the SC) of a country deals with the SC. Even though Philippines is not an Islamic country but everybody is equal and nobody is above criticism and justice. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-16144786

NuPak | 12 years ago | Reply This is all stupid! Doesn't look like this "Ego Circus" is going to stop soon. I mean here the nation is struggling with the deteriorating condition of day-to-day living conditions and the most responsible institutions are showing claws, teeth & muscle-flexing to each other. By picking politicians' speech cases the judiciary just proved it has as much of a calibre as it's hand picked defendants.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ