Equally laudatory was the fact that the Supreme Court forced the Inspector General of the Frontier Corps in Balochistan, (who is a two-star general) to appear in the court. The military has been the driving force behind the operations in the province and has been accused of involvement in the disappearances, but has never before been ordered to account for its actions. By setting the precedent that a relatively senior member of a paramilitary force cannot escape accountability before the judiciary, the Supreme Court is not only making it clear that it intends to take the Balochistan problem seriously, it is also showing that there will be no holy cows in this matter. The next step for the Supreme Court, should the officer not prove cooperative, is to move up the chain of command and ensure justice is served.
Right now, the Supreme Court may be the best hope we have in reducing tensions in Balochistan. It is the only institution in the country with the moral authority to act as an arbiter in the increasingly bloody fight between the military and the separatists. By producing and releasing missing persons, the Court can prove its good intentions and then proceed to punish those who have made kidnapping citizens unofficial policy. Integrating Balochistan into the rest of the country is a long process that will require years of trust-building. Decades of broken promises and unjust repression cannot be undone in an instant. But the Supreme Court has started by taking the right steps. It now needs to show the fortitude to see this through.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 10th, 2012.
COMMENTS (4)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@huzaifa:
One incident (that too alleged, not conclusive) in a country of 1.25 BILLION population.
The figures given by those who are affected range in thousands abducted and hundreds of mutilated bodies thrown on remote road to be eaten by wild animals.
Least ISI could do is give these Muslim victims a simple burial which every Muslim deserve no matter what he did while alive.
@ashok: As for as your side is concerned your supreme court ordered meekly in 2004 against a kidnapping case which CID was investigating and RAW was involved. Incidently, son of Justice died in a weird accident and CID officer fell from its balcony in drunk state, the case is still pending well! our Supreme court is doing great job, they are breaking Taboos and i wish them God speed.
Unless Pakistani courts give a verdict (just like they quickly gave for Ray Davis or Indian SC for the Doc) nothing would happen. Our judiciary is busy making policy and populist statements and not writing tough verdict. The charade continues forever.
Sir, these are not MISSING persons; these are KIDNAPPED or ABDUCTED persons.
The establishment has coined new words such as MISCREANTS for Muslim insurgents in Pakistan and MISSING persons for those who are routinely abducted during day light in front of every one to see and then make them disappear without any paper trail or appearance in the court.
Hawks approve such cruel behavior of agencies towards innocent citizens without have any evidence with the agencies but in case of Hafiz, they need SOLID proof no less then "caught in action".
There are many crimes committed by people with influence (gun or religion, for example) leaving no evidence; circumstantial or corroborative evidence must be admissible in such cases.