Domestic violence bill a copy of Indian law: Fazl

Demos held for and against the bill; JUI-F says it undermines Islamic values.

Zahid Gishkori April 07, 2012


A landmark bill seeking to deter all forms of domestic violence against women has reached a serious deadlock following stiff resistance by Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam Fazl (JUI-F). Claiming that the bill undermines Islamic values, the party announced on Friday it would fight “tooth and nail” against it.

Strong resistance by opposition parties, including the Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz (PML-N), had forced the government on April 4 to defer the bill, introduced in 2009, which sought heavy jail terms for those involved in violence against women.

“We cannot adopt a bill which is a ditto copy of a bill on women passed by India’s parliament,” observed JUI-F chief Fazlur Rehman, when lawmakers, under the leadership of Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) senior leader Syed Khurshid Shah, met to forge a consensus on the issue.

Fazl claimed the bill promotes Western culture and values rather than Islamic ones. “NGOs continue to promote the culture which keeps women away from Islam and that is not acceptable to us.”

The JUI-F chief termed it an effort to destroy the dignity of women in Islam and urged followers to stand united against those who wanted to impose Western culture in Pakistan.

“We know women’s rights better than the PPP… Western culture cannot be promoted under the pretext of protection in Islamic states,” maintained the JUI-F chief.

On Thursday, lawmakers across party lines failed to evolve any consensus to amend a controversial clause of the aforementioned bill passed by the National Assembly in 2009. Since the bill was not adopted by the Senate in 90 days, rules stipulate it can only be passed in a joint sitting of Parliament.

PPP MNA Yasmeen Rehman had tabled the bill earlier stressing the institutionalisation of measures required to protect women and children from domestic violence.

Despite PPP senior minister’s efforts, the opposition could not be convinced into contributing positive suggestions so that the bill could be tabled once again before the joint sitting next week.

“The PPP-led government has always been a strong supporter of women’s rights but some forces (followers of conventional schools of thought) are dead against the passage of this landmark bill,” Khurshid Shah told The Express Tribune after the meeting.

PML-N, the top opposition party in the National Assembly, also dragged its feet over the bill when MNA Khawaja Saad Rafiq implied that external forces had stakes in the passage of its controversial clauses. He refrained from explaining his thoughts further.

The government has long wanted to move the overdue Domestic Violence Bill, 2009. The opposition, however, maintains that the bill cannot be passed by Parliament until further amendments are made to its clauses. “We are not against passage of this bill, but we want some changes in clauses.”

The lawmakers will now hold a meeting over the issue on Monday.

Friday also witnessed opposing protest rallies outside Parliament by, both, human rights activists and Islamic parties. Rights activists chanted slogans in favour of the passage of the bill, while religious activists raised slogans opposing it. Harsh words were traded by both sides during the demonstrations as they also raised slogans against each other. The protesters were eventually dispersed by the local police.

Published in The Express Tribune, April 7th, 2012.


Southpole | 10 years ago | Reply

@Rakib Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 Primarily meant to provide protection to the wife or female live-in partner from domestic violence at the hands of the husband or male live-in partner or his relatives, the law also extends its protection to women who are sisters, widows or mothers. Domestic violence under the act includes actual abuse or the threat of abuse whether physical, sexual, verbal, emotional or economic. Harassment by way of unlawful dowry demands to the woman or her relatives would also be covered under this definition.Violence Act 2005.

Dani | 10 years ago | Reply

I support azmat and kaalchakra. And the ones commenting against the action taken by Moulana Fazal ur Rehman must try reading the clauses of bill first. If you want Pakistani society to be a wild open society like the American where you don't know your father and couples get engaged to each other after having 3 children, you better think once again.

Islam doesn't supports violence of any type. But giving everyone a free hand to do whatever he/she want contaminates the cultural and moral values, which we still possess.

For all those who are not Pakistani and are not muslims.........keep your nose away from our matters. You have no right to speak on these matters and you are not asked to give your opinion.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

Most Read