China vows to slow reliance on executed inmates' organs
China has long vowed to reduce its reliance on death-row inmates for organs, but high demand and a chronic shortage of donations mean they have remained a key source -- a situation that has generated heated controversy.
But Huang Jiefu, vice health minister, said the government wanted to abolish this practice altogether and was in the process of setting up a nationwide organ donation system, the official Xinhua news agency reported.
"China... promises that within three to five years, it will completely change the abnormal method of relying mainly on death row inmates to obtain transplant organs," Huang was quoted as saying in the report late Thursday.
The health ministry would not confirm his comments when contacted by AFP.
Beijing banned the trade in human organs in 2007 and two years later began rolling out a nationwide donation system, which Huang said was currently being trialled in 16 provinces and cities.
But demand for organ transplants still far exceeds supply in the country of 1.3 billion people.
An estimated 1.5 million people need transplants every year, but only around 10,000 are carried out, the report said, citing health ministry statistics, opening the door to the illegal sale of organs and forced donations.
Organ donations are not widespread in China, where many people believe they will be reincarnated after death and therefore feel the need to keep a complete body.
International human rights groups have long accused China of harvesting organs from executed prisoners for transplant without the consent of the prisoner or their family -- charges the government has denied.
In 2009, Huang said the rights of death-row inmates were respected and written consent from prisoners was required before their organs could be harvested, state media said at the time.
Nonetheless, he has repeatedly conceded that executed prisoners are not a proper source for organ transplants.
COMMENTS (4)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
1734609344-0/Untitled-(69)1734609344-0-165x106.webp "article")
1734609710-0/Copy-of-Untitled-(62)1734609710-0-270x192.webp "dominique pelicot jailed for 20 years over mass rape of wife")
1734593191-0/Copy-of-Untitled-(58)1734593191-0-270x192.webp "nine people killed as israel attacks yemen s civilian ports and infrastructure")
1734590229-0/Copy-of-Untitled-(56)1734590229-0-270x192.webp "amazon workers to strike at multiple us warehouses during holiday season")
1734468458-0/Copy-of-Untitled-(50)1734468458-0-270x192.webp "salman agha shares man of the match award with saim ayub in touching gesture")
1734511806-0/Untitled-design-(5)1734511806-0-270x192.webp "saim ayub breaks brian lara s odi record")
@j. von hettlingen: "To steal the organs of the executed prisoners is a heinous thing to do." How do you promise the delivery of a vital organ taken from an executed prisoner in two hours? By timing the execution to the time promised. And, of course, the prisoner did not know where his various parts would end up. When that segment was aired, I spoke to a then recent immigrant Chinese about it. I was bowled over by his reply. "That is the best way a criminal can pay back his country. At least his wretched life had one redeeming act in it", he said. But that was not his act; the state willed it. China's cynical utilitarianism could be compared to Nazi doctor's abominable practice during WWII of getting bodies of all his young Jewish prisoners tattooed with the intent of using their skin as lamp shades after they had been gassed.
To steal the organs of the executed prisoners is a heinous thing to do. Not only should the authorities need the consent of the prisoner or his family, they should also compensate them for the "harvest".
Chinese government is rogue authoritarian system. Unfortunately US policy of engagement had fattened these rogues and made them untouchable.
In a "60 Minutes" (CBS) documentary sting, some years back, it was revealed that Chinese government had a branch office in the US which offered organs for transplantation commercially. A price list for various organs was passed on to the team. And, as to how much advance notice would be necessary, the answer was a couple of days would be nice. But if the situation was really dire, any organ would be made available at a few hours' notice.