And then, in the 5th century BC, from nowhere, Greece produced a miracle. A series of geniuses, unprecedented in their fields of study, came to the world. Herodotus, the first historian, wrote a book on the wonders of Egypt, Persia and India around 480 BC. He was followed by the war historian Thucydides. Then Xenophon, a scholar and a mercenary who fought in Persia. He wrote the first book on economics. In the same period, Hippocrates wrote a treaty of medicine.
Athens, a city of only 50,000 men produced the great philosophers Socrates and Plato. Philosophy means love of truth and these men were freethinkers of the highest order. Euclid discovered geometry, while to the west, Pythagoras had his theorem and the theory of music. In this period, Athens also invented democracy, the first time that man chose who would govern him. More importantly, he would also decide who would interpret the laws. The jury was invented. Aristotle, who studied under Plato, developed the system of logic and classification, producing modern science and biology. The Greeks pondered about creation. They asked themselves that if everything had a cause, how could the universe, and indeed God, have come to being without something propelling them? In the 4th century BC, Aristotle’s pupil Alexander the Great conquered Egypt. After this, the best Greek minds moved to Alexandria to further refine the sciences.
The decline of Athens and Greece accelerated after the rise of Rome. Though the Romans revered the Greeks and many Roman historians wrote in Greek, they were themselves more interested in conquest than knowledge. The decline of Rome began before the rise of Christianity in the 4th century AD and Rome was finished off by the time Islam came to the world in the 7th century.
The church did not allow freethinking about the nature of the universe as the Greeks had. Instead, it insisted on biblical truths about virgin births, magic apples, God’s progeny and 1000-year-old men. Those who theorised differently were burnt for being heretics.
Science declined across Europe as all the best young minds turned to the clergy, where the money was, since the church was the most powerful institution. A parallel development was the decline of the Greek language after the Bible was translated into Latin. Greek science was locked into Greek manuscripts, most of which were lost. This was the period Europe called the Dark Ages, centuries of decline in learning.
Then something remarkable happened.
In the 11th century, a group of churchmen called the Scholastics began to study science. They did so to defend the church’s orthodoxies against charges that they were inconsistent and unscientific. Their studies brought them to Aristotle, who had theorised on the origins of the universe, among other things. A brilliant clergyman called Thomas Aquinas resolved the problem of the universe and its cause to the satisfaction of science-minded Christians. God, he said, was the Creator before whom there was no Creation. He was eternal and, Aquinas said, formless.
Much later, around the 15th century, the church became fascinated with Plato. He was hailed as the greatest philosopher of all time, a position he has held in the modern era. This romantic rediscovery of ancient Greece was not limited to philosophy and medicine and science. It took physical form in Italy’s town, Florence. Here, a powerful business family called the Medici began patronising art that reproduced the architectural and sculptural styles of ancient Greece. And so we got Michelangelo and Leonardo da Vinci. In 1550, the art historian Giorgio Vasari gave this renewal of Greek culture in art a name: The Renaissance.
From here we have the Enlightenment that produced the modern philosophers in Scotland, Francis Bacon and, later, the scientists of the Royal Society in England and the people who reformed religion in Germany and elsewhere in northern Europe. End of story. Cut to the modern world, space travel and internet. To most people, this is the sequence in which modernity unfolded in human history. And more or less that is how it did.
As easterners, as Hindus and Muslims, should we accept this sequence as pure? Are we mere recipients of modern culture or participants? Did we have any contribution to make? We will explore this next week.
Published in The Express Tribune, March 18th, 2012.
COMMENTS (32)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
EXCELLENT piece as usual sir ! Kudos !
Please do not mock intelligence level of your readers and do remember that beside Mediterranean and west of Eurasia human and their civilization has developed in 4 continents so do not ignore them in your mindless concentration on Indian sub-continent.
The world will not respect Indians (or any other subcontinentals) until our populations are prosperous and educated.
As they say, history is written by the victors.
@unbeliever could not agreed more sir, @kamal, i agreed sir/miss but what is the point...
@Ali Tanoli: In 11th Century, the Hazara region of Pakistan(where you Mr Tanoli comes from), was still very Hindu-Buddhist
Truly it is a brief intellectual history of mankind and the contribution of ancient Greeks is incomparable and as they say all philosophy is footnote to Plato ' s nay Aristotal ' s thought . The only exception being Mr Akar 's ignorance of Averros contribution that the great Muslim Andalusian philosopher of 11th century made to philosophy from whom Thomas Aquina borrowed heaviy and became progenitor of European enlightenment. Of course Aristotle remains one of the greatest thinkers in the western evolution of scientific and philosophic tradition .
The author has touched upon a subject of great interest.Expecting a lively debate. Can't wait for the next week.
Due to its concept of Bida'at (to avoid anything new), Muslim contribution is nil. Whatever they claims is just a translation/popularisation of Greek and Indian works. Instead of Arabic numerals it should be called Indian numerals, as it was contribution of Indians. The Muslim scholars likely Ibn Sina, Al Warraq, al Razi and others about whom Muslims wrongly claims to be original contributrs in Sciences were themselves ATHEISTS, and never acceptd as Muslims by orthodox like Imam Ghazali and common people of society.
It was a good piece of writing to read. Now I am desperately waiting for the exploration of the next week's article.
So far as the question 'Are we mere recipients of modern culture or participants?' is concerned, Muslims and Hindus certainly are participants. Among many other ideas, Muslim took the idea of Hindu Numerals from India. And it was Islamic Golden Age (800-1258 A.C.) that paved the way for European Renaissance.
@Ali Tanoli: but that's something which happened thousand years back. now since they are the winners, they are writing history according to their wishes.
if we want to correct them, we will have to prove our worth now
@ jahaz , you forgot Hamid Gul and the dafan council
Aakar Patel does Muslims a disservice by calling them an Eastern religion - they are just as Eastern or Western as other semitic origin religions; he is also probably hurting their sentiments by ridiculing revered characters from the Old testament (Adam, Methuselah). Much of the thinking that is attributed to Christianity is actually that of the Roman Catholic Church, and of reformation movements that also arose consequently - it has no bearing on the content of the holy books which are not Western in origin. No offense to my Pak friends, but the contribution of muslim parts of the world during Europe's dark ages was in largely preserving existing European and 'Eastern' thought - and the transfer of this information from East to West and vice-versa; they served as the librarians of the world (since all information is already present in the Quran, there is no possibility for any Muslim 'scientist' to come up with anything original, is there? :). Just joking. However, you will find that there are strains of thought in both ancient Greece and Vedic India which are common in terms of philosophy and jurisprudence; Vedic thought was continually tempered by reform movements from within (like Buddhism and Jainism) as well as contact with China and Arabia, and managed to survive even during the invasion of Islam; while Greece and Rome could not withstand the onslaught of a foreign thought process that eventually engulfed a large part of the civilized world. However, if we are to discuss a clash of civilizations, it is hardly East vs West, it needs to be the 'I am right (don't ask me why) and therefore you are wrong' vs the 'There are many paths to arrive at one truth'. This is where the real dichotomy lies.
@Rizwan Gondal who writes "Few factual mistakes: Philosophy does not mean ‘love for truth’ rather ‘love for wisdom.’ Birth of christ was not in 4th Century AD rather it was in 4th B.C and the religion christianity, if all antecedents are kept in view, rose around 40 AD. Renaissance was also more due to the discovery of Roman statesman,orator, and thinker Cicero’s writings. Rise of Rome was not co-related to the fall of Atehns/Greece. Both are independent of each other. The writer failed to address the basic question exhibited by the topic of his column i.e. Rise of Modernity nor he could define what modernity is?"
Can't you, sir, understand a simple article, written in simple English?
4th century is the rise of Christianity and not the birth of Christ. Rise of Rome and fall of Greece are never related in the article.
Rise of modernity will be in the next article.
Read it ten times before commenting.
@Jahaz
I loved your comment. Still laughing.
True! The Euro-centric world is a 'partial-world' of her own exclusive, full-of-vanities, approaches to human past. Every civilisation, thousands of years more ancient to Europe, founded and contributed to these intellectual activities before Greeks and re-carried forward from Greeks to contemporary or 'modern' West. So there is no Zero-sense for the 'Easterns' rather is "innings" or "turns" of these cultures and civilisations of whatever geography, time and faith bearer.
@author - you have touched a sensitive topic. History is written by victors and not by vanquished. West for the last few hundred years has dominated the world and hence very little is written about the likes of Aryabhatt, Bhaskaracharya, Chanakya.
Wait for a few decades when and if East again gets its dominance back you will see a reversal of this trend.
Waiting for your next installment, get ready for both boquets and brickbats :-)
@Dude: "The first piece of literature was the Epic of Gilgamesh?"
Interesting. In the Epic of Gilgamesh one comes across the story of an old man with the name of Utnapishtim, who survives the Great Deluge. The Sumerians (meaning civilized people) were non-Semitic. *Gilgamesh was a Sumerian, * from Mesopotamia.
The followers of Moses who crossed the Red Sea were Canaanite Egyptians (Africans) somehow found it very convenient to copy-paste a legend from Mesopotamia, they renamed Utnapishtim to Noah and claimed it as their own epic.
Think if we had copyrights then.
Notable omissions-
. The hindu civilisation of Mohenjodaro and Hariappa which had urbanised into cities in ? 3000 BC
Aryabhatt, hindu astronomer, who said the earth is round and revolves around the sun- in 490 AD !!
Golden age of ISLAM with doctors like Avicenna
Golden age of Egyptian architecture and medicine in 1000 BC
ETC
Thank you Farian, unbeliever, dude and American for pointing out the obvious
We will wait till next week sir but 11th century christian were educated by Muslims spains & Baghdad.
Very interesting article. Looking forward to the next installment.
Aakar Patel you are brillient as always and I am your fan forever because of your writings and enlightened humanistic views!! . But in this piece you forgot to mention the period in which rationalists in muslim world brought new life to long forgotten greek manuscripts on philosophy, logic, mathematics and medicine and contributed immensly to humanity in that so called dark ages. . Thomas aquinas, like Maimonides, was influenced by rationalist like Averroes(Ibn e Rushd). Unfortionately for Islam, humansits and rationalists like Ibne Rushd, Ibn e Tufail, Ibn e Sina,Razi and other intellectuals lost to orthodoxy and figure like Al Ghazali, who argued against reason and condemned logic. To this day Islam is under Ghazalian world view and Ghazali is a true founding father of Salafi school of thought, which was revived by Maududi and later Hassan Albanna and now neo Salafist Tariq Ramadan.
I think our contribution is Zero after our contribution of Zero !!!
all this history was written by the westerner in 19th century, when their power was at it's zenith...later discoveries rendered their history just piece of propoganda.
the civilisation of mesopotamia, egypt,indus, and chinese were building canals and forts for their residents, when these westerners were drinking water from brooks.
it would be irrelevent to detail all the advances made by orientelists, just a few examples would suffice: babylonians, mesopotamians and indians of yore had long discovered pythagorous theorm, and had even proved them, but the credit was taken by a western.
however complaining about these things won't get us anywhere. if we are to prove ourselves as a force to reckon with, we will have to prove our worth now.
Science declined across Europe as all the best young minds turned to the clergy, where the money was, since the church was the most powerful institution. A parallel development was the decline of the Greek language after the Bible was translated into Latin. Greek science was locked into Greek manuscripts, most of which were lost. This was the period Europe called the Dark Ages, centuries of decline in learning
just replace christianity here with islam, and you will get the answer why their is so much strife in islamic world today?
Really a great and informative article
Irrespective of what our past contributions may have been, the only imperative, now, is to catch up.
Few factual mistakes: Philosophy does not mean 'love for truth' rather 'love for wisdom.' Birth of christ was not in 4th Century AD rather it was in 4th B.C and the religion christianity, if all antecedents are kept in view, rose around 40 AD. Renaissance was also more due to the discovery of Roman statesman,orator, and thinker Cicero's writings. Rise of Rome was not co-related to the fall of Atehns/Greece. Both are independent of each other. The writer failed to address the basic question exhibited by the topic of his column i.e. Rise of Modernity nor he could define what modernity is?
How come you completely skipped out on Islam's "Golden Age" during Europe's dark age? Very strange.
Doesn't most knowledge used during Europe's enlightenment trace back to scholars and scientists in the Muslim lands?
The West was not living in isolation so all nations had their influence. I'm assuming u have a one sided view in order to encourage some thinking or even critical debate but it sounds incomplete if not biased.
We were Indians. Then we became Indians and Pakistanis. Then we decided to become South Asians. Now we are "Easterners".
Would anyone else like to put a stop to this runaround?
"Are we mere recipients of modern culture or participants?"
Ancient India has contributed more than other during its peak era. Indians,greeks and persians have contributed a lot. Too bad to see uisma take credit for others work
Somehow you forgot the contribution of Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamian civilizations. Remember, the first written law was the code of hammurabi? The first piece of literature was the Epic of Gilgamesh?
Lately East and especially Madina-e-Saani has produced scholars like Zaid Hamid, Ansar Abbasi,Dr Amir Liaqat Hussain, Ali Azmat and the list continues AlHamdulilaah!!