Steel Mills: SC asks Production ministry why it failed to take action on audit report

Pakistan Steel Mills counsel reveals losses worth Rs26.526 billion incurred during fiscal year 2008-09.


Azam Khan March 13, 2012
Steel Mills: SC asks Production ministry why it failed to take action on audit report

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court of Pakistan has sought reasons from the Ministry of Production for its failure to take prompt action on the receipt of the forensic audit report that identified losses worth billions of rupees due to negligence and corrupt practices at Pakistan Steel Mills (PSM).

The counsel for Pakistan Steel Mills, Fakhruddin G Ebrahim revealed before the court that losses worth Rs26.526 billion had been incurred during the fiscal year 2008-09. He said said that as per Forensic Audit Report prepared by independent audit firm Awais Hyder Liaqat Nouman, out of the accumulative losses of 26.526 billions, business losses were Rs4.68 billions, losses due to corrupt practices were Rs9. 99 billions and losses due to mismanagement/negligence were Rs11. 84 billions.

A three member-bench headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, while hearing the case of corruption and mismanagement in Pakistan Steel Mills, came down hard on the accountability agencies and the relevant ministry for their failure to scrutinize affairs of the PSM.

Ebrahim informed the court that all accused were on interim bail and no case was being processed against them due to one reason or the other. The chief justice said that all persons responsible for such corrupt practices were known to the relevant ministry, National Accountability Bureau (NAB) and Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), but they were reluctant to take any action against them.

“As per admission of Gul Muhammad Rind, Secretary Production, the forensic audit report was received by his ministry about six months back. We are surprised to note that no steps so far have been taken by the ministry despite the fact that Pakistan Steel Mills is not being run properly,” the court observed in its written order.

Ebrahim pointed out that five enquiries had been initiated by the FIA in the matter, but no case had been registered so far.

The court asked secretary production as to why action had not been taken immediately after receipt of the forensic audit report by the ministry, who explained that the ministry was contemplating referring the matter to the National Accountability Bureau regarding all the cases which had earlier been registered by the FIA and regarding enquiries which were pending with the FIA.

The court gave a chance to the ministry of Production to take decision on this. “The corruption and mismanagement in leading institutions of the country forced the Supreme Court to intervene to remind the relevant accountability forums of their primary responsibilities,” observed Justice Khilji Arif Hussain, a member of the bench.

Referring to the audit report, the chief justice lamented that PIA, Railways and PSM were “finished” due to such corrupt practices, negligence, overstaffing on ‘sifarshi chits’ and the quota system.

“In view of this report, which only pertains to the financial year 2008-2009, it is not known that up till now how much loss has been occurred in this organization,” chief justice said.

The court would take up this issue again on March 15.

COMMENTS (5)

Aqeel Ahmed | 12 years ago | Reply

I still earnestly believe we will overtake Asia in steel production in 2-3 years as per Zaid Hamid's theory. What do you think?

Takmeel e Pakistan

Khalid Pathan | 12 years ago | Reply Pakistan steel mill, Railway, PIA and WAPDA needs to be privatized by a fair and transparent process. In order to save Pakistan from bankruptcy and further harm, privatization is a must. Unless very strict measures are taken to check the economic decline the country is getting closer to event horizon, with no hope of return to normal.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ