'Pakistan-Iran energy plan not final, US willing to support energy crisis'

US deputy chief of mission says US still waiting on Pakistani parliament's review of terms.


Maha Mussadaq March 07, 2012
'Pakistan-Iran energy plan not final, US willing to support energy crisis'

ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan-Iran energy plan is not final but we are willing to support Pakistan’s energy crisis, stated US Deputy Chief of Mission Richard Hoagland on Wednesday.

“It won’t be [completed] tomorrow or in another year,” said Hoagland while attending a round-table discussion to commemorate the services of women in law enforcement – an event organised by the Narcotics Affairs Section (NAS) of the US Embassy on International Women’s Day.

Lately, the US had been pressurising Pakistan to turn down the Iran gas pipeline deal under the Iran Sanctions Act. But Pakistan has insisted on going ahead with the project.

On the deteriorating Pak-US relations, Hoagland said that the US is still waiting for Pakistan’s Parliamentary Committee on National Security to review the terms in this relationship and then the US “will take it from there”.

He also said that US Ambassador to Pakistan Cameron Munter has returned from the US, but has nothing to say about the relationship “that will create breaking news”.

Commenting on a recent news of US military commander General James Mattis visiting Pakistan to discuss the Nato supply routes, Hoagland said that he was not aware whether it was true or not.

COMMENTS (22)

Hassan | 12 years ago | Reply

Similar commitments have been made in the past by USA, I will suggest that they keep their money where their mouth is!

BruteForce | 12 years ago | Reply I would love for Pakistan to build that pipeline costing billions and see the US and EU sanctions kick in. Pakistan cannot buy the Oil and the entire project will go to waste. Keep up your jingoism, it will get you nowhere, in fact drag you down the drain.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ