Waheeda Shah suo motu: ‘Assault more serious than Sarfaraz Shah killing’

Bukhari prayed that she came to the court to 'apologise'.


Azam Khan/web Desk March 02, 2012

ISLAMABAD: While drawing parallels between the extrajudicial killing of Sarfaraz Shah and Waheeda Shah Bukhari’s assault on polling staff, the Supreme Court of Pakistan on Friday said that the Election Commission of Pakistan and police have failed to take a timely decision on the incident.

Heading a three-member bench for the suo motu hearing of the incident, Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry observed that the Inspector General of Police Sindh should resign from his post over the episode.

The IG Sindh defended himself before the court and said that there was no comparison between the killing of Sarfaraz Shah and this incident. Chief Justice Chaudhry replied saying, “This incident is even more serious than the extrajudicial killing, because it has brought shame to the country.”

“Due to the negligence of law enforcing institutions, such incidents take place. The officials go really far, to an extent that they take the law into their hands.”

Bukhari prayed that she  come to the court to “apologise”. When the chief justice inquired about Bukhari’s counsel, she said, “You [chief justice] are my lawyer and you [chief justice] are my judge.”

Chief justice directed the IG Sindh to take action against the incident according to the law and submit a report before the court at the next hearing on March 12.

“If such an incident could take place in the by-polls, what would happen in the general elections.”

Attorney General of Pakistan Maulvi Anwarul Haq informed the court that the FIR lodged against Bukhari was not “proper”. He said that according to Section 353 and Section 189 of the Pakistan Penal Code should have been imposed, given the violation done by the MPA.

AG Haq informed the court that according to these sections, Bukhari would have to undergo a two-year-long imprisonment and pay a heavy fine.

IG Sindh informed the court that these two sections will be added in the FIR. The chief justice said that it should have been done without the court having pointed it out.

The court also observed that police “did not even bring the case file in the hearing.”

The court observed that the ECP should have not only been a witness, but also a complainant in the case.

Earlier the court was moved by an application filed by District Management Group (DMG) officer Anita Turab.

Turab had stated in her application that “most civil servants wish to work in an environment where their self-respect and dignity is not made vulnerable by all and sundry. A number of us feel committed to stand by a self-imposed code called ‘the Moral Revival’, which is the flagship commitment to restore the lost dignity of civil servants (and) to reclaim the classic independence of the institution through internal and external reforms.”

Bukhari was declared the winner in the initial vote-count of the provincial seat by-poll (PS 53), but following Saturday’s now infamous slapping incident caught on video, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) withheld official results.

Our Publications

COMMENTS (62)

Khuda Ka Banda | 9 years ago | Reply

She not only serve some Jail time, she should be made lesson for all high headed politicians. She Also be banned for life time. At the same time Police and all authorities who were silent spectators also be taught some lesson.

bigsaf | 9 years ago | Reply

“This incident is even more serious than the extrajudicial killing, because it has brought shame to the country.”

What a stupid thing to say. While I hope the thuggish politician gets what's coming to her, this was an outrageous statement. Simply shows a backward drama queen regressive conservative mentality of the judge. While democracy is paramount, extra-judicial murder is more heinous. Seems he feels only inclined to take action when an 'embarrassing' moment is caught on tape, which is woman thug beating as opposed to military man murdering. No wonder murder and terrorism is so strife in Pak. Judges' priorities are all messed up.

@Qaiser k. Ahmed:

CJ erred in his statement. He should apologize to Sarfaraz Shah’s family.

He absolutely should

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ