The petitioner, Chairman Al-Jihad Trust, Habib Wahabul Khairi, known for being a counsel in the Supreme Court’s 1999 famous judgment related to judges’ appointment criteria, alleged that former Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto established the ISI’s political cell for his vested personnel interests in 1975.
“The purpose of my petition is to end ISI’s interference in political affairs of the state, as it is a violation of fundamental rights,” Khairi said.
Khan's petition, filed in 1996, had requested the court to look into allegations that the ISI had provided Rs140 million to create the Islamic Jamhoori Itehad to harm Benazir Bhutto’s election campaign.
Recently, General Mirza Aslam Beg, then army chief, and Lt General Assad Durrani, then ISI chief, confessed to the allegations against them in Khan's petition, in their affidavits submitted to the court.
Khairi was also Khan’s counsel in the 1996 case against ISI when it was taken up by the Supreme Court.
However this time around, Khairi would argue on his application separately before a three-member bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry, while Advocate Suleman Akram Raja would appear on behalf of Khan.
Khairi has also made Beg and Durrani respondents in his application and requested the court to order closing down ISI’s political wing permanently.
He asked the court to ensure recovery of the distributed money from political parties including Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) and Jamaat-e-Islami (JI), keeping in view the present value of the money and declare all those politicians ineligible for their corrupt practices in the elections.
Khairi also submitted a written affidavit of former interior minister Naseerullah Babar regarding ISI’s role in state affairs that had already been submitted in Supreme Court along with a secret report of the Zulfiqar Commission.
He would also present a statement of Lt Colonel Shams Toheed about some negative trends in the armed forces and ask the court to pass an appropriate order so that such trends could be rectified through amendments in the army act.
COMMENTS (6)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
CJP test and I hope he will not do any harm to his favourites under the cover of LAW.
It's the thought that counts?
Let us see what our CJ does. He probably will dispose off this case without convicting his mentors.
Just recovery of money & that too from politicians? Air Marshal sahib what are a few crores between friends!!
Every prime minister be it from PPP or any other party is has used ISI against its political and non-political opponents, but ISI should form its direction itself away from politics which maligns the highly esteemed institution
Good move, let's ban all of those corrupt politicians who ever took funding from these agencies. Hopefully, this case will also shut up many who were QUICK to DECLARE that ISI was also funding PTI/IK (but it’s sad that some will never admit the realities - not because they have any convincing arguments but because they do not have courage to admit that they were wrong)