FO summons acting US ambassador over Balochistan bill

Foreign Office seeks explanation over US Congressman's bill on Balochistan.


Ppi/web Desk February 20, 2012

ISLAMABAD: US Charge d' Affaires Ambassador Richard Hoaglan was called to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Monday and a strong protest was lodged with him with regard to the tabling of a resolution on Balochistan in the US Congress.

Ambassador Hoagland was told in clear terms that the move in the US Congress was contrary to the spirit of friendly relations and violates the principles of the United Nations Charter, international law and the recognised norms of inter-state conduct.

He was asked to convey the serious concern of the Government of Pakistan to the US Administration, said a statement of the Foreign Office.

The motion, which had been moved by Congressman Dana Rohrabacher and co-sponsored by House Representatives Louie Gohmert and Steve King, highlights Balochistan’s troubled past with the centre after the creation of Pakistan and calls upon Pakistan to recognise the Baloch right to self determination.

Today, a resolution was also filed in the Punjab Assembly secretariat to condemn the US bill on Balochistan and demanded that US Ambassador to Pakistan Cameron Munter be summoned in the house for an explanation.

COMMENTS (54)

Rosie Deus-von Homeyer | 9 years ago | Reply

@Siddique Malik:

Pakistan signed contracts with NATO

and in Contract Law the doctrine of:"Pacta servanta sunt!" rules.

The CONTRACTS must be served!

In case Islamabad breaks these contracts,NATO will sue the Pakistan Government for a breach of contract and as know the USA lawyers are very sharp,they aready embeded such a clausels in these contracts,which will oblige Pakistan to pay VERY stiff penalties.

Rosie Deus-von Homeyer | 9 years ago | Reply

@Siddique Malik:

You with your AID! What aid? When I listen to CNN reporters,US is giving AID in BILLIONS (they always speak about BILLIONS!) to every peasant in Subcontinental Africa!

USA does NOT give AID to Pakistan...these are probably loans from INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND or the World Bank.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ