Contempt case: ‘PM will not advise president to pardon him, if convicted’

Aitzaz says verdict against PM would not be end of the rope.


News Desk February 17, 2012



While many are speculating over the Supreme Court’s verdict in the contempt case against Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani, those who see the premier being ‘sacrificed’ for the sake of the ruling-government will be disappointed, says Aitzaz Ahsan, and to top it off the premier’s counsel believes that Gilani will manage to steer clear from the Supreme Court’s wrath without seeking a presidential pardon.


Talking to Express News host Kamran Shahid, Aitzaz said that the “prime minister will not advise the president to pardon him, if convicted.”

During the course of the show, Ahsan broke down the entire process by which the prime minister would be forced to relinquish his seat in the National Assembly, and hence his post as a result of his disqualification.

“The entire process could take months,” Aitzaz said.

He went on to divulge that not all convictions led to disqualifications.

“Once the verdict comes, the case will be put before the Speaker of the National Assembly, where the speaker will have 30 days from the time the resolution is moved to decide whether Gilani can be disqualified due to the verdict,” he said.

Even if the speaker declares the PM as disqualified, the matter then has to be deliberated before the election commission, which has to decide within 90 days whether this verdict disqualifies Gilani as an member of the National Assembly. Even then, the prime minister can challenge the election commission’s ruling, he added.

Aitzaz, however, was hopeful that he may still be able to persuade the seven-member Supreme Court bench that the prime minister was not in contempt.

“The case was closed on merit,” Ahsan said, adding that writing a letter to the Swiss authorities would bring the money back. “To get money out of Swiss accounts, the government would need to file a civil suit in Switzerland.” However, he said that “the time bar for filing this case has passed,” adding that even if the government wanted, there is no way of retrieving the money.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 17th, 2012.

COMMENTS (10)

ufaquarian | 12 years ago | Reply

disappointed with Aitazaz.....money / power or blackmail made him switch sides.....:(

Das | 12 years ago | Reply "to top it off the premier’s counsel believes that Gilani will manage to steer clear from the Supreme Court’s wrath without seeking a presidential pardon." Learned barrister simply beleves so. On what grounds, no one knows.Even if his client has spoken to him to this effect, PM is well known to eat back his word.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ