NRO letter: Nawaz throws weight behind Supreme Court

Says judiciary unfairly being termed ‘partial’ for demanding what the Pakistani people want.

Zainab Imam February 13, 2012

KARACHI: Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz President Nawaz Sharif might have let the Memogate case go, but he is still fully focused on the National Reconciliation Ordinance case.

“If money belonging to the people is looted from them and stashed away in accounts in Swiss banks, will the nation not demand that this money is returned to them?” Nawaz said at a joint news conference with Mumtaz Bhutto, chairman of the Sindh National Front (SNF) Mumtaz Bhutto.

The statement comes hours after the Supreme Court framed contempt of court charges against Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani, for failing to write a letter to Swiss authorities despite court instructions in the NRO case.

Talking about the letter, which has become a bone of contention between the judiciary and the government, Nawaz said that the people must be explained what the significance of this letter is. The letter, he said, should say that this money belongs to the people of Pakistan and it is their demand that this money is brought back to their country. “The money will only be brought back if this letter is written. So why is the government unwilling to write this letter and bring the money to Pakistan?”

In a clear reference to President Asif Ali Zardari, Nawaz said that nobody in the country is willing to accept that one man who has looted all this money and refuses to bring it back is allowed to go scot-free while a prime minister becomes his scapegoat. “It must be clarified to the people what the government is committed to: the country or corruption? The prime minister has also taken oath under the constitution and should be clear on which side he is on.”

Coalition partners

Responding to a question, Nawaz said that in supporting the government in its refusal to write the infamous letter, the coalition partners are behaving irresponsibly. “This move is completely against the aspirations of the Pakistani people and it is because of the allies’ support that the government feels that it can get away. The coalition parts, therefore, must reconsider what they are doing.”

Severely criticising the coalition partners, he said that their support to the government in this matter was unconstitutional and illegal. “Not only are they siding with the government, they are also accusing the judiciary of being partisan.”

Supporting the judiciary

The judiciary, he said, is being unfairly blamed for being partial. “Does the ordinary Pakistani citizen not want that this money is returned? That’s what the Supreme Court is also saying and hence asking for the letter to be written. Is it, then, saying something unjust?”

On the matter of presidential immunity, he said that the Supreme Court will better decide on the issue but in his view, immunity or no immunity, the people’s money must be returned to them. “The nation does not care about immunity. Even a person like me doesn’t understand it. It is the nation’s money, it should first be returned to its rightful owners and then we will talk about immunity.”

Dodging a question about whether the PML-N will take to the streets if the government-judiciary showdown continues, he said that the entire nation is with the judiciary on the matter. “The government is responsible and it has committed crimes, but is trying to blame the judiciary. This is unacceptable.”

Commenting on Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Chairman Imran Khan’s recent statements about the PML-N, Nawaz said that those who really yearn for change do not join hands people from the status quo. “He doesn’t welcome people who are responsible for where Pakistan is today. Politicians should not have double standards.”

Asked about boycotting elections, he said that the PML-N has always maintained that it will only boycott elections if the Pakistan Peoples Party does so. “I have said since the London all-parties conference that for an effective boycott, all parties must refuse to participate in polls.”

Mumtaz Bhutto meeting

Earlier, Bhutto said that in the meeting, he and Nawaz discussed what can be a new direction for an immediate change in the dismal situation of the country. “We must search and find a solution.”

He said that there is a consensus among all political parties that this government cannot be expected to hold free and fair elections, which is why the 20th amendment has been brought in the assembly. “We discussed the formation of an interim government and its mandate,” Bhutto said.

To a question of a possible alliance between his and Nawaz’s parties, he said that his party’s reach is limited to Sindh and it operates on a one-point agenda that Pakistan should become a confederation, implying that the two parties had different agendas.


Zulqarnain | 9 years ago | Reply

The chief justice’s explication of the guiding judicial principle that “the courts must not act as an Opposition to the government” similarly sets another confine of the court realm. In a speech CJP said that the government had failed in its responsibility. The Opposition, obviously, also has been pronouncing the same. Thus the courts have to be more circumspect not to blur the lines as they certainly have a right to comment on the efficiency of the functionaries involved in any particular case under their consideration yet a pervasive blanket disapproval of the government at an out of court entrants event is certainly beyond their boundaries. The executive is an embodiment of the aspirations of the electorate — it has to submit to their evaluation and to command a continuous confidence of their parliament. Any certificate for their conduct and performance by the superior courts constitutes neither a condition nor a criterion for their success or failure. This evidently also restricts the courts’ incursions to curtail the executive authority such as fixing of sugar prices or the recent lightning command for a commitment not to sack the two commanders.

Maryam | 9 years ago | Reply

If a man looks like a confused soul, walks like a confused soul and quacks like a confused soul, he is a confused soul.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read