Held in contempt

Prime Minister now been asked to appear before the court on February 13 for the framing of charges.


Editorial February 02, 2012

As the extraordinary soap opera that is Pakistan’s politics continues, we have a new moment of high drama. In a unique situation, a sitting prime minister has been indicted by the Supreme Court in the contempt of court case against him.

The case, of course, stems from the failure of the government to write a letter to Swiss authorities requesting a reopening of cases, following the striking down of General Pervez Musharraf controversial National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO) by the apex court. The arguments of Mr Gilani’s counsel, Aitzaz Ahsan, that he was not an entirely free actor in this matter and needed to follow the advice of the Law Ministry and Human Rights Division was given short shrift by the nine-member bench, which had asked why the PM had failed to follow the advice of the courts in the first place.

This decision, of course, brings the NRO affair to a head. The prime minister has now been asked to appear before the court on February 13 for the framing of charges. This could be another moment of drama. But the relatively long time period set suggests that the court believes the government may be able to put up a case and that, for now, not all is settled. The new summary presented by Aitzaz, stating that no cases exist in Switzerland against the prime minister or the president following the NRO also raises some issues, while the counsel has also mentioned the possibility of filing an intra-court appeal.

What is most important at this juncture is to keep things simple; to do the ‘right’ thing, show restraint and follow the law. The law of our land is quite clearly written out in the Constitution — which sets out in clear terms the role of institutions. These roles need to be adhered to if we are to avoid anarchy. The period of 10 days set by the court should also allow the government some time to think, reflect on all that has happened and accept that the letter to the Swiss authorities must, indeed, be written if we are to see order and the continued functioning of a democracy which must move on despite the bumps it encounters along the way. That all said, one can’t help but wonder why the superior courts never held any military dictator in contempt of the Constitution.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 3rd, 2012.

COMMENTS (9)

Mirza | 12 years ago | Reply I have written a few comments early morning but none was posted. This drama can be easily quashed like Mansoor Ijaz did with the ISI and SC. Let the SC make any decision. Then give the PM presidential pardon according to the constitution. This would suck the oxygen out of this baloon also. What else would be left for the PCO SC judges after that? Why cannot these judges digest the fact that Zardari is an elected President and Internationl laws and Pakistani constitution gave him the immunity. In addition he has powers of presidential pardon. Live with it. People have elected the current govt well after the Swiss cases which these same judges could not decide themselves while keeping Zardari in jail for over a decade.
Mohammad Ali Siddiqui | 12 years ago | Reply

I have already said Good Bye to Mr. Gilani.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ