There is, of course, no empirical evidence to support this contention; it also ignores the political, economic and cultural factors that have gone into this phenomenon. In fact, religious extremism, sometimes inaccurately referred to as ‘fundamentalism’, came much later to Muslim countries than to those associated with democracy and liberalism. In this context, people in two self-proclaimed stalwarts of democracy — the US and Israel — one old and the other young, continue to show a strong fascination with ‘fundamentalism’, which appears to be deepening its influence on national politics and electoral processes.
This is particularly surprising in the case of the US (long a refuge for those persecuted in their own homelands on the basis of their religion), when it is recalled that separation of religion and state was enshrined in the Constitution and many of its founding fathers prided themselves on their commitment to keeping the two separate. And yet, religion has come to wield an increasingly powerful influence in national politics; its first evidence emerging during John F Kennedy’s (a Roman Catholic) campaign for the US Presidency. Ever since, fundamentalist groups have played a visible role in elections; but it was Barack Obama’s presidential bid that galvanised the right wing Christian evangelicals to demonstrate their clout in national politics, with many alleging that he was a ‘closet Muslim’, influencing some 25 per cent of Americans to believe that he was not a Christian!
Israel, too, has had problems with fundamentalist groups, some of whom have spawned extremism and militancy, impacting on both domestic and foreign policies. In addition to its historical ‘divide’ between the European Jews (Ashkenazi) and local Jews (Sephardic), the country has gone through another transformation, with over a million Jews coming from the former Soviet Union, most of whom are deeply conservative, thus strengthening extreme right wing parties. This has influenced not only politics but social behaviour as well, that is deeply worrying the moderates. Recent reports indicate discrimination against females becoming institutionalised and even socially acceptable in government circles.
Women’s exclusion, known as ‘hadarat nashim’, is advocated forcefully by ultra orthodox sects who accuse liberals of waging a war against ‘pious’ people. The best known of these ultra-orthodox sects, known as the Haredim are even ambivalent about the establishment of the Israeli state, convinced that it was insufficiently religious and established prematurely, because the Messiah had not yet arrived! More significantly, they run their own schools, which are unregulated by the state and, therefore, follow their own syllabi. Sounds familiar to many of us in Pakistan!
This is a phenomenon that is assuming unprecedented importance in American politics as well, with evangelical groups coming together to exert influence in both local and national electoral processes, particularly to undercut moderate Republicans. It is also a by-product of their influence that prompts those aspiring for elected office in the US, to swear their loyalty to Israel, occasionally in rather obsequious ways.
It is in this context that former Speaker of the US House of Representatives, Newt Gingrich’s recent statement about the Palestinians being an “invented people”, should be viewed: as a product of the deeply symbiotic relations between Christian evangelicals in the US and the ultra-orthodox in Israel. This also explains the deep embarrassment suffered by President Obama, when his much heralded initiative on the Middle East was scuttled by the Israeli leadership, confident as it was of unquestioning support in the US Congress. Ever since, Obama has repeatedly reiterated his loyalty to the Jewish state, but has not been forgiven for this initiative, nor has it prevented his Republican opponents from accusing him of “throwing Israel under the bus”.
Published in The Express Tribune, February 1st, 2012.
COMMENTS (10)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Also, while Gingrich's comments about Palestinians was pandering to a pro-Israeli evangelical base, it was directly influenced by a US casino mogul named Adelson giving him $10 million. Adelson is a strong supporter of Israel, Israeli settlements and the expulsion of Palestinians from the region. In the 90s, Gingrich told Arafat he would help him build a Palestinian state and $10 million later the Palestinians became "invented people".
Political influence, yes, they do wield, but there is a line in the West everyone is aware of. But, that line seems to be non-existent in Muslim Countries.
Tariq Fatemi Sahib is playing to the galleries, all states no matter democratic, authoritarian or otherwise are influenced by their religious clergy. This has happened since the start of times, only reason we hear about the US and Israeli religious lobby is because of their secular constitutions and free media which allows their people to express opinions, for and against. Can the honorable Tariq Fatemi proclaim the same for Pakistan where a sitting Governor is assassinated because of his liberal views?
Democracy by nature is tolerant and secular concept! Show me a single Islamic country which is truly democratic (please leave out Turkey which is a secular state). Bangladesh is trying hard to find it's ground as a secular nation. Rest of the Islamic countries suffer from dictatorships (either military or family based) of various degrees Show me a single Muslim majority country where minorities are treated as equals. Is it a proof of intolerance?! Denial of truth is no solution!
Our problem is that state deliberately patronzies intolerant interpretations of Islam to attain foreign policy goals. We were Muslims before and after partition until 70s, and nobody persecuted each other for minor religious differences.
How about the Jewish and Christian fundamentalists present in the West? If only they would worry about that than worry about Muslims.
In case you haven't noticed it - no one in Pakistan's govt bats an eye when your religious fanatics get out of hand - one might even say that they promote it. The USA and Israel have their fanatics but when they create problems they are roundly criticized by the govt, the people, the media, and other religious leaders.
Good article. It would be interesting to analyze this world wide surge in conservatism in followers of monotheistic religions. Is it because they are beginning to realize that they have reached irreconcilable differences with liberalism? or is it more of a reactionary mechanism to perceived cultural imperialism?
Yeah but Kennedy, Obama and others still won the elections, even with religious opposition.
Can this happen in Pakistan?
Also minorities aren't killed by the majority in those countries.